la county deputy tosses woman on ground

[QuickHitCurepon]

Then she started that BS of yelling out that she couldn't breath (which you can't do unless you CAN breath).

That is probably the greatest myth of modern times.

“To speak, you only have to move air through the upper airways and the vocal cords, a very small amount,” and that does not mean that enough air is getting down into the lungs where it can supply the rest of the body with oxygen, said Dr. Gary Weissman, a lung specialist at the University of Pennsylvania.

Medical experts: Floyd’s speech didn’t mean he could breathe

“The ability to speak does not mean the patient is without danger.”

www.nbcnews.com

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

The cop did say to move back, but it was barely audible and unclear who it was directed at. The cop has his back to the woman when he says it, so it doesn't make any sense to call it a valid order.

 

[progressive hunter]

You found a very small acorn and I agreed with you

Cant you take yes for an answer?

when you start going off of the constitution and our rights and not your feelings I might,,

 

[progressive hunter]

That only applies after you reach a courtroom where a judge might agree with you

Till then you have to obey police instructions

of course you have a link to back that up???

I can wait,,

 

[progressive hunter]

what the heck. these two are shoplifters and fought the cops and was impeeding their jobs. just to crooks getting arrested who did not want to be. all they had to do was comply and take responsibility for their crimes. but when do blacks ever do that ? same oh same oh in their world.

when was it .proven they shop lifted??? what did they steal??

 

[AZrailwhale]

According to the news report, she and her husband had been detained by Winco security for theft, then they attacked the Winco security personnel. That's why the LA Sheriffs were called. The Deputies were taking custody of suspects detained by the security officers.

This is from one of the links:
Luna said that the sheriff’s department received a call from an employee who said that two customers “were assaulting loss prevention employees.”

“Upon arrival, a deputy approached a man matching the description given by store security personnel. As deputies attempted to detain the individuals, the encounter escalated into a use of force incident that was captured by a community member with a cell phone camera,” Luna said.
I may have been reading into the comment, but the only reason WinCo would have been detaining someone would be theft.

 

[progressive hunter]

This is from one of the links:
Luna said that the sheriff’s department received a call from an employee who said that two customers “were assaulting loss prevention employees.”

“Upon arrival, a deputy approached a man matching the description given by store security personnel. As deputies attempted to detain the individuals, the encounter escalated into a use of force incident that was captured by a community member with a cell phone camera,” Luna said.
I may have been reading into the comment, but the only reason WinCo would have been detaining someone would be theft.

another reason to detain someone is they match a description,,

and it was the cops that escalated the situation not the lady,,

not going to play this we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong BS,,

from whats on the video the cop had no reason to go straight to violence,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

This is from one of the links:
Luna said that the sheriff’s department received a call from an employee who said that two customers “were assaulting loss prevention employees.”

“Upon arrival, a deputy approached a man matching the description given by store security personnel. As deputies attempted to detain the individuals, the encounter escalated into a use of force incident that was captured by a community member with a cell phone camera,” Luna said.
I may have been reading into the comment, but the only reason WinCo would have been detaining someone would be theft.

why did you leave this part out??

The sheriff said that he has viewed both the body camera video and video recorded by a bystander and found the footage “disturbing.”


“It's disturbing. There's no ifs ands, buts about it,” Luna said, adding that the investigation will include interviews with witnesses and a review of the body camera, cell phone and surveillance videos from the store.

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[horselightning]

That is probably the greatest myth of modern times.

“To speak, you only have to move air through the upper airways and the vocal cords, a very small amount,” and that does not mean that enough air is getting down into the lungs where it can supply the rest of the body with oxygen, said Dr. Gary Weissman, a lung specialist at the University of Pennsylvania.

Medical experts: Floyd’s speech didn’t mean he could breathe

“The ability to speak does not mean the patient is without danger.”

www.nbcnews.com

dude was od ing and having heart attack . why are fighting about this now. crazy

 

[horselightning]

This is from one of the links:
Luna said that the sheriff’s department received a call from an employee who said that two customers “were assaulting loss prevention employees.”

“Upon arrival, a deputy approached a man matching the description given by store security personnel. As deputies attempted to detain the individuals, the encounter escalated into a use of force incident that was captured by a community member with a cell phone camera,” Luna said.
I may have been reading into the comment, but the only reason WinCo would have been detaining someone would be theft.

uh huh the crooks were the problem

 

[progressive hunter]

uh huh the crooks were the problem

what crooks??
it hasnt been proven they were the people in question,,

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

uh huh the crooks were the problem

"They matched the description" only means they were black and the robbers were black.

 

[horselightning]

"They matched the description" only means they were black and the robbers were black.

oh if they were innocent they would not have faught cops and assaulted officers in the store.

 

[progressive hunter]

oh if they were innocent they would not have faught cops and assaulted officers in the store.

when did it get proven it was them inside the store??

last I heard it hasnt,,,

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

oh if they were innocent they would not have faught cops and assaulted officers in the store.

They didn't fight the cops. It couldn't have been more plain.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

According to the news report, she and her husband had been detained by Winco security for theft, then they attacked the Winco security personnel. That's why the LA Sheriffs were called. The Deputies were taking custody of suspects detained by the security officers.

What news report?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

what the heck. these two are shoplifters and fought the cops and was impeeding their jobs. just to crooks getting arrested who did not want to be. all they had to do was comply and take responsibility for their crimes. but when do blacks ever do that ? same oh same oh in their world.

What the hell, you are a mumble mouth, racist that just spews lies and your dumbass racist buddies just come and join the party. Since you love posting stuff, please post where they were charged with shoplifting and post where it is illegal to record the cops.

 

[Mac-7]

So you have to let the police rape you until a judge says that was wrong?

I don’t think so.

You are getting sillier with every post

That means you are getting desperate

 

[Marener]

You are getting sillier with every post

That means you are getting desperate

Just illustrating the point that you don’t need a judge to tell you when you’re being the victim of a crime before you exercise your right to self defense.

You’re quite silly to suggest that you would.