la county deputy tosses woman on ground

[toobfreak]

she was arguing,, fighting is a physical act,,

You never heard of verbally fighting with someone just as you are doing right now?

 

[progressive hunter]

Mayeeumdastoopidone!


So what?


That is EXACTLY what matters, idiot!


Apparently the police differ with you. They were arresting her husband and she got involved. Had she stood 30 feet away, the cop wouldn't have messed with her, but she had that BIG DUMB BLACK LOUD MOUTH thinking that SHE gets to decide what she CAN and CANNOT do! NEWS FOR YOU, Buttwipe, when the police are there, they are the law. They talk, you LISTEN. GOT THAT?

You don't like it, file a complaint later with a judge.

she doesnt need to stand 30 ft back,,

apparently the cop might be going to jail or costing the city thousands,,

 

[progressive hunter]

You never heard of verbally fighting with someone just as you are doing right now?

thats arguing,, its in the 1st amendment,, you ever heard of that??

 

[leftwinger]

she was arguing,, fighting is a physical act,,

She resisted when the Cop approached her to give further final orders or to arrest her (accomplish to the robbery). You can only get one at a time since the big one looked like a resister in waiting.
She forced the takedown via non-compliance.

 

[progressive hunter]

She resisted when the Cop approached her to give orders or to arrest her. She forced the takedown via non-compliance.

thats funny,, because every other boot licker on this thread says the opposite,,,

if she wasnt under arrest his orders meant nothing and he can go fuck himself,,

and standing still isnt resisting,,

 

[Marener]

I dont know

Maybe the deputy was wrong to tell her to stop recording

Or maybe not

But she should have complied with the order and filed a complaint later

You have a constitutional right to film police.

 

[Mac-7]

You have a constitutional right to film police.

And a human right to fight with the cops to the death on the street if they violate your constitutional rights.

 

[progressive hunter]

And a human right to fight with the cops to the death on the street if they violate your constitutional rights.

when did she fight with the cops??

all she did was stand her ground,,

 

[toobfreak]

she doesnt need to stand 30 ft back,,

She does if the cop tells her to.

 

[Marener]

And a human right to fight with the cops to the death on the street if they violate your constitutional rights.

Police need to remember their authority isn’t unlimited. Filing a complaint at the police station isn’t going to change anything.

 

[toobfreak]

thats arguing,, its in the 1st amendment,, you ever heard of that??

The police are not the government and obeying a cop's lawful order to cease and desist is not any damage to your 1st amendment. The police are there to keep the peace and this woman obviously had a problem with her criminal husband getting arrested.

 

[progressive hunter]

She does if the cop tells her to.

no she doesnt,, she was not interfering with what they were doing and did move back what looks like 10 ft,,

unless youre under arrest you dont have to comply with just about anything a cop says

 

[Mac-7]

when did she fight with the cops??

all she did was stand her ground,,

Its the same thing

She refused to follow orders and resisted arrest

 

[progressive hunter]

The police are not the government and obeying a cop's lawful order to cease and desist is not any damage to your 1st amendment. The police are there to keep the peace and this woman obviously had a problem with her criminal husband getting arrested.

it wasnt a lawful order,, if you are not under arrest or physically interfering you dont have to do a thing a cop tells you to,,

what crime did her husbad comitt??

 

[Marener]

The police are not the government and obeying a cop's lawful order to cease and desist is not any damage to your 1st amendment. The police are there to keep the peace and this woman obviously had a problem with her criminal husband getting arrested.

The police are quite happy to issue unconstitutional orders. Especially if you let them.

 

[Mac-7]

no she doesnt,, she was not interfering with what they were doing and did move back what looks like 10 ft,,

unless youre under arrest you dont have to comply with just about anything a cop says

If the deputy was wrong thats for the legal system to decide, not the wife of a criminal on the street

 

[progressive hunter]

Its the same thing

She refused to follow orders and resisted arrest

I dont see where they arrested her,, so she doesnt have to do what the cops tell her to,,

 

[progressive hunter]

If the deputy was wrong thats for the legal system to decide, not the wife of a criminal on the street

what crime did he comitt??

better to stop bad cops in their place than spend tens of thousands in court doing it,,

 

[Mac-7]

it wasnt a lawful order,, if you are not under arrest or physically interfering you dont have to do a thing a cop tells you to,,

what crime did her husbad comitt??

So not being a lawful order in your opinion that entitled the woman to ignore police authority?

I dont think so

 

[progressive hunter]

So not being a lawful order in your opinion that entitled the woman to ignore police authority?

I dont think so

yep,, thats exactly what it means,,

they have no authority over you unless youve committed a crime