beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 44,145
- 16,464
. Wait, that's what I'm using is AdBlock plus. When try to space bar it throws everything out of whack, and I can't get it to straighten back out. So it's either short post and nothing long or just hope that the long post can be interpreted or comprehended right.. The duck, duck program won't let me do that... So it's either give up the adds for longer post in result of or go back with dealing with the aggravating adds in order to properly do paragraphs. Not going back to those adds. LOL.. In that video I can hear the life of that bumpstock ending abruptly. Talk about the straw that broke the camel's back.. If not banned completely, then it needs to be extremely regulated out of the reach of just anyone purchasing such a thing. Anyone owning any kind of weapons that can cause mass casualties and death should be extremely vetted, kept up with, made sure their collections are inspected for safe keeping, not bragged about, locked up tight, and used only at private gun ranges, or on private property where the public is not invited. 2nd amendment is safe as it should be, but what happened in Vegas is totally unexceptable. The practice of safe gun ownership comes with transparency between law enforcement and citizen. We as good citizens should be able to own great gun collections, but we should be willing to go through the vetting process that our collections would call for. I mean what is it between the gun culture and the nation's laws concerning guns now or forever ? Is it that citizens want to keep their collections secret (off the grid) because they fear government becoming or going rogue in the future ?? The military right now (as has been allowed by the votes and Goodwill of the citizens), if it were to be directed at shutting down a rise up of the citizens against it, then it would win quickly. People know this, so what other reasoning do people have in keeping their collections secretive from the prying eyes of the law ?? One very good reason is that if one group of citizens were to ban together in a rise up against another group of citizens, then the good group let's say, could defend itself against the bad group for whom decided to rise up against the good group. It's no different than defending your home or property against Intruders where as (if we're many before the law could arrive), then you and your family could defend yourselves until help arrived. There is no gauging a situation like that by government, otherwise as to what type of collection or weapons would be needed by the citizen in order to defend themselves against a large group wanting to do harm or to steal one's rations in a global emergency that may place people into such situations. If multiple EMP's were to detonate over an area in a war situation, and people survived until the aftermath came (aftermath being total chaos and calamity), where as people would be forming groups to search for resources, then you would need a way to defend your stockpiles against those groups. The second these days I'm hoping is not so much about fighting our government, but more so about preserving our country by way of preserving our private property, resources, and ourselves if government fails. If government fails by a catostrophic event, and group's form to finish each other off over resources, then your rights to defend yourselves will come into play big time.Oh, the conspiracy theories abound. I do agree that things are being obscured.
I'm not saying to believe everything, but here's a couple of plausible things, that woman dying is highly suspect:
![]()
Las Vegas Shooting: Video Shows 'Security Guard' Gunman Shoot Into Crowd
Las Vegas massacre survivor dies abruptly after posting her detailed eyewitness account of multiple shooters on Facebook
TL; DR
Paragraphs, dude. Paragraphs.
Never heard of Adblock Plus? USMB kinda changes the format of whatever you type, anyways.