Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,391
- 9,170
- 1,340
You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.Koper concluded by saying that “a new ban on large capacity magazines and assault weapons would certainly not be a panacea for gun crime, but it may help to prevent further spread of particularly dangerous weaponry and eventually bring small reductions in some of the most serious and costly gun crimes.”
That kind of guarded language may not make for great sound bites for either side in the gun debate, but it more accurately reflects Koper’s findings and conclusion.
— Robert Farley
Did the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban Work? - FactCheck.org
What is your solution?
_______________ no limit to fire rate?
_______________ no limit to arsenal size?
_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?
______________ yes machine guns should be legal?
______________ the more guns the better?
_______X________ no limit to fire rate?
________X_______ no limit to arsenal size?
________X_______ no limit to magazine/drum size?
_____X_________ yes machine guns should be legal?
(they are, you should look it up)
_______X_______ the more guns the better?
Yes to all of your questions.
Nearly six hundred people. Let that sink in.
Let's be honest here.
We don't know how many people were actually shot and how many were injured in the stampede
Like it fucking matters.