Las Vegas shooting: Reports of shooter at Mandalay Bay Casino

[Auld Phart]

your statement:
it is not a 'need', it is a desire.

Just like people that want a bigger house, a faster car, etc.

And they don't NEED a legal way to own it.

Stop being a dick.

pot calling kettle black?

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

 

[MarkDuffy]

If you misuse your toys....the whole class will suffer

yup

that's the standard democrat answer isn't it.

One person screws up, screw everyone for it

That's life
Abuse your privileges and those privileges get taken away

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

I didn't shoot them.

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

Welcome to the real world

Do you want to also stop TSA at customs? Get rid of traffic lights? Allow kids to drink and do drugs?

Do you want to also stop TSA at customs? Get rid of traffic lights? Allow kids to drink and do drugs?

what does that have to do with gun control?

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

I used to think you cannot be this dumb, but obviously I need to stop giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Civilization unfortunately results in the loss of rights and privileges. Individualism & total freedom has to give a little for the good of the group.

You can no longer throw your trash outside your house and cause disease for your neighbors.

 

[rightwinger]

Derp!

Which of course has not a fucking thing to do with Paddock.

Thinking only guns are good weapons for mass murder is a bit shallow no?

In this case they are, dope.

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Parents around the country will go to their Congressman and ask.....My child was murdered in Las Vegas, what will you do about it?

Republicans in Congress will reply....Well, I can give you my thoughts and prayers

 

[Marion Morrison]

yup

that's the standard democrat answer isn't it.

One person screws up, screw everyone for it

That's life
Abuse your privileges and those privileges get taken away

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

I didn't shoot them.

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

Welcome to the real world

Do you want to also stop TSA at customs? Get rid of traffic lights? Allow kids to drink and do drugs?

Do you want to also stop TSA at customs? Get rid of traffic lights? Allow kids to drink and do drugs?

what does that have to do with gun control?

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

I used to think you cannot be this dumb, but obviously I need to stop giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Civilization unfortunately results in the loss of rights and privileges. Individualism & total freedom has to give a little for the good of the group.

You can no longer throw your trash outside your house and cause disease for your neighbors.

Abuse what privileges of yours?

 

[Auld Phart]

yup

that's the standard democrat answer isn't it.

One person screws up, screw everyone for it

That's life
Abuse your privileges and those privileges get taken away

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

I didn't shoot them.

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

Welcome to the real world

Do you want to also stop TSA at customs? Get rid of traffic lights? Allow kids to drink and do drugs?

Do you want to also stop TSA at customs? Get rid of traffic lights? Allow kids to drink and do drugs?

what does that have to do with gun control?

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

I used to think you cannot be this dumb, but obviously I need to stop giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Civilization unfortunately results in the loss of rights and privileges. Individualism & total freedom has to give a little for the good of the group.

You can no longer throw your trash outside your house and cause disease for your neighbors.

You've proven you can be that dumb.

Your side seems to want to limit the second more than it already is.

as we saw in Charlottesville, you want to restrict the right to Free Speech.

are there any parts of the Bill of rights you don't want to restrict?

 

[Dale Smith]

Unless it was all "staged" .... we only know what "they" let trickle out. Not much.
The Maiden-Marion (and I) are suspicious. Calling Dale Smith



edit: this is all too clean? shoot a bunch of TrumpAholics in the back from 400 yards with houses full of other weapons? No one knows anything? Maybe some truth will come out some day?

It reeks of an Operation Gladio type of event. There are too many conflicting accounts like there were multiple shooters and there is clear video of rifle flashes on the 10th floor from three different rooms. They turned on the lights while this was going on making the concert-goers more vulnerable THEN you have exits that were blocked and inaccessible to them to escape.

THEN we are told that this 64 year old man lugged nearly 20 rifles up to the 32nd floor of a posh Vegas Hotel and no one noticed? This is the epitome of the Hegelian Dialectic.....create a crisis, wait for the emotional outcry and then propose a solution to the very problem you caused that fits your agenda. Not even 24 hours after this event, I got an e-mail from Moveon.org asking me to sign a petition banning semi-automatic weapons while begging for a donation.......such bullshit.

Another hoax, eh, delusional dale?

Not a hoax, fawn..........I simply doubt the official narrative including the story that the alleged shooter had Antifa literature in his hotel room. People did die and from what I have ascertained? They were left like sitting ducks when the lights were turned on. Do YOU buy the official story "lock, stock and barrel" with the attitude of "Move along folks...nothing to see here"?

There is no official story yet, dumbfuck.

They are saying it was a lone gunman and we know that is the bullshit. Police scanner chatter and eye-witnesses say so, "dumbfuck".

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Except it's white gun nuts doing all of the mass killing.

O? Since 1900?

What?

It's not white gun nuts doing all the mass killing.

No wonder you all don't see a problem. You're all woefully underinformed.

White men have committed more mass shootings than any other group



Tell us some more about the need for a Muslim ban.

They never told you the difference between "some" and "all", huh?

In Spanish: Algunos y Todos.

The vast majority. Better?
You gun owning white folks are by far the biggest threat to my public safety.

 

[rightwinger]

The republican side shirley won't

Neither will the Dimocrats.

They want to ban 'assault' rifles again, like Clinton did, based on the actions of a dozen or so people that misused them, and ignore the millions of other owners that havent' .

(not to mention, they look scary)

If you misuse your toys....the whole class will suffer

yup

that's the standard democrat answer isn't it.

One person screws up, screw everyone for it

That's life
Abuse your privileges and those privileges get taken away

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

Killing 59 people is an abuse of privileges

I didn't shoot them.

Why do you want to abuse MY privileges?

Because that is the way things work in a civilized society

I can drive over 100mph hour safely, why should I have to slow down because others crash?
I can hold my liquor, why should I not be allowed to drink and drive?
I enjoy smoking, why should I have to stop just because others do not like it?

 

[Dale Smith]

O? Since 1900?

What?

It's not white gun nuts doing all the mass killing.

No wonder you all don't see a problem. You're all woefully underinformed.

White men have committed more mass shootings than any other group



Tell us some more about the need for a Muslim ban.

They never told you the difference between "some" and "all", huh?

In Spanish: Algunos y Todos.

The vast majority. Better?
You gun owning white folks are by far the biggest threat to my public safety.

Hutch SEZ????? "Only my beloved gubermint should have guns!!!!'

That's a good little commie....... (snicker)

 

[rightwinger]

High capacity and high firing rate guns are a danger to society and need to be banned

 

[Hutch Starskey]

And they don't NEED a legal way to own it.

Stop being a dick.

pot calling kettle black?

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

 

[Marion Morrison]

O? Since 1900?

What?

It's not white gun nuts doing all the mass killing.

No wonder you all don't see a problem. You're all woefully underinformed.

White men have committed more mass shootings than any other group



Tell us some more about the need for a Muslim ban.

They never told you the difference between "some" and "all", huh?

In Spanish: Algunos y Todos.

The vast majority. Better?
You gun owning white folks are by far the biggest threat to my public safety.

Funny, I would think that would be heart disease, prescription meds, and automobile accidents.

 

[Marion Morrison]

pot calling kettle black?

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

That's a good wittle meme parrot.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What?

It's not white gun nuts doing all the mass killing.

No wonder you all don't see a problem. You're all woefully underinformed.

White men have committed more mass shootings than any other group



Tell us some more about the need for a Muslim ban.

They never told you the difference between "some" and "all", huh?

In Spanish: Algunos y Todos.

The vast majority. Better?
You gun owning white folks are by far the biggest threat to my public safety.

Hutch SEZ????? "Only my beloved gubermint should have guns!!!!'

That's a good little commie....... (snicker)

Go back to the conspiracy cave, dope.

 

[Auld Phart]

pot calling kettle black?

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

They're my rights as well.

Then act like it, defend them.

Stop trying to take the rights away from the innocents.

 

[koshergrl]

pot calling kettle black?

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

Bullshit. You aren't more reasonable, and your reasonableness is irrelevant anyway.

You don't get to restrict my access to weapons. Isn't going to happen. I'll make my fucking own, and I will use them on people who try to take them.

 

[koshergrl]

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

They're my rights as well.

Then act like it, defend them.

Stop trying to take the rights away from the innocents.

This all ties in with the regressive belief that there are too many people in the world (particularly *unreasonable* people). They stupidly cast themselves as the *survivors* in their communist fantasies. But they aren't. No matter who comes out on top, everybody wants them gone and the first action taken by either side is to neutralize the useful idiots.

 

[Leo123]

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

You are not ever going to 'lock this shit down' by taking weapons away from law abiding citizens. Automatic weapons are already illegal. How did that work out?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What?

It's not white gun nuts doing all the mass killing.

No wonder you all don't see a problem. You're all woefully underinformed.

White men have committed more mass shootings than any other group



Tell us some more about the need for a Muslim ban.

They never told you the difference between "some" and "all", huh?

In Spanish: Algunos y Todos.

The vast majority. Better?
You gun owning white folks are by far the biggest threat to my public safety.

Funny, I would think that would be heart disease, prescription meds, and automobile accidents.

Except the subject was mass shootings, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No, calling you a dick.
No one needs a freaking bump stock mod.

'need' is not the issue.

No one 'needs' a car that goes 200 mph.
(Considering speed limits, no one needs a car that goes 100mph)

no one 'needs' a house with 50 rooms.

no one 'needs' any number of things

When someone kills or injures 600 people with their house, then you'd have somewhat of a point.

You gun nuts would do well to just take what you already have and stop pushing the limits.

Why do you want to restrict the RIGHTS of a person, because some other person misused that right?

It's become a serious public safety concern. It's time to lock this shit down.
Restriction is not removal. They're my rights as well. I'm just far more reasonable than you.

They're my rights as well.

Then act like it, defend them.

Stop trying to take the rights away from the innocents.

Nothing is being taken away, dope.