Last year two Boston University professors published a law review article arguing the Vice President is the sole federal officer with discretion ...

[IM2]

Trump lost in 2020. A conservative federal judge named Michael Luttig told Pence that he could not do what the OP claims.

 

[badbob85037]

Why do you think they should be charged? They were wrong, but it's not illegal to be wrong. Just like trump, they have a right to believe and say anything they want, even if they are wrong. Even if what they say is a lie. Those two professors didn't break the law like trump did.

Just which law has Trump been convicted?

 

[there4eyeM]

We have been convinced by both "sides" that the other is criminally unqualified for public office.
Next!

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Not what it says, derp.

So if you are saying VP Harris doesn't have the ability to overturn elections, why do you morons believe Pence did, or Biden in the 2016 election, or Cheney in the 2008 election, or Gore in the 2000 election



Yall are utter morons who wanted to have a fascist takeover of government and still do

 

[Care4all]

Several folks have already noted, that none of the laws in that particular indictment, have been designed for the so-called crimes Jack Smit has brought. . .

The prosecutor claims to get into the mind of, and know the thinking of Trump. He claims to know the intent, and what is motivating Trump. This is a claim of contesting vs. subversion of the republic. It is absurd on its face. The only folks that will buy it are the weak minded and gullible.

This is preposterous. There is no real, concrete proof of this. Hell, read Care4all's post, where, in her own words, tells use, the prosecution could not begin till we got the gossip and opinions of other staff and lawyers. Its garbage.

They are turning this nation into a place like Russia, China or Iran.

I don't like Trump, but this legal prosecution, is something we would see in an authoritarian nations.

When intent is part of the law being charged with breaking,

how does ANY Prosecutor prove intent? Surely it is done in every one of those cases when the defendant is convicted. So, how do you think other prosecutors do it?

 

[BULLDOG]

Just which law has Trump been convicted?

Tons of them. He stole from a charity, so he or his family are no longer allowed to have anything to do with the administration of any charity. His fake university. The 5 million he had to pay to that E. Jene (?) lady. You'll note he was shown to have raped her in that case. His party refused to convict him in either impeachment, but they publicly said they knew he was guilty afterward. He has a long history of not paying his workers. He's a crook.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Well, they need to be charged with something. Surely they cannot be allowed to walk around and dispute people like Bill Barr and Jack Smith.

Last year two Boston University professors published a law review article arguing the Vice President is the sole federal officer with discretion under the 12th Amendment to determine the validity of electoral vote submissions. Presumably they risk being charged with felonies now​

CLEARLY they should be charged with conspiracy to expose Biden

 

[struth]

Well, they need to be charged with something. Surely they cannot be allowed to walk around and dispute people like Bill Barr and Jack Smith.

Last year two Boston University professors published a law review article arguing the Vice President is the sole federal officer with discretion under the 12th Amendment to determine the validity of electoral vote submissions. Presumably they risk being charged with felonies now​

According to the Xiden admin this is chargable.

 

[struth]

Tons of them. He stole from a charity, so he or his family are no longer allowed to have anything to do with the administration of any charity. His fake university. The 5 million he had to pay to that E. Jene (?) lady. You'll note he was shown to have raped her in that case. His party refused to convict him in either impeachment, but they publicly said they knew he was guilty afterward. He has a long history of not paying his workers. He's a crook.

hahha he didn't steal from a charity...why do you lie? His charity got in trouble because his campaign paid the vets, instead of it going through his charity. Literally...that's how petty the Demafascsit were to get Trump. Rather sad

 

[BULLDOG]

hahha he didn't steal from a charity...why do you lie? His charity got in trouble because his campaign paid the vets, instead of it going through his charity. Literally...that's how petty the Demafascsit were to get Trump. Rather sad

rump spent $60,000 of charity money for a portrait of himself. The court said he was using the charity as his own personnal source of income.

 

[struth]

rump spent $60,000 of charity money for a portrait of himself. The court said he was using the charity as his own personnal source of income.

yeah, so who did he steal the money from? hahahha

 

[Moonglow]

yeah, so who did he steal the money from? hahahha

The charity

 

[struth]

The charity

Haha it’s his charity…he stole from himself? And what did he steal? The charity is allowed to purchase things, and he was alllowed to direct what was purchased

 

[BULLDOG]

yeah, so who did he steal the money from? hahahha

The charity that he set up. Those donations weren't his money to spend. It belonged to the charity.

 

[struth]

The charity that he set up. Those donations weren't his money to spend. It belonged to the charity.

It was his charity to run, he ran it, he could buy things for the charity you idiot.

 

[BULLDOG]

It was his charity to run, he ran it, he could buy things for the charity you idiot.

The court didn't agree with that defence. Seems trump thought it worked that way too, He was wrong. A smart person would have found out how charities work before they set one up. Seems they aren't as good to dodge taxes as he had hoped.

 

[struth]

The court didn't agree with that defence. Seems trump thought it worked that way too, He was wrong. A smart person would have found out how charities work before they set one up. Seems they aren't as good to dodge taxes as he had hoped.

Haha what court case are you talking about? Haha

The trumps got in trouble over his campaign paying veterans instead of the foundation

He didn’t get in any trouble over the painting

You just keep repeating debunked propaganda

 

[d0gbreath]

So VP Pence had the discretion. He used it. The rest is history.

 

[Richard-H]

Well, they need to be charged with something. Surely they cannot be allowed to walk around and dispute people like Bill Barr and Jack Smith.

Last year two Boston University professors published a law review article arguing the Vice President is the sole federal officer with discretion under the 12th Amendment to determine the validity of electoral vote submissions. Presumably they risk being charged with felonies now​

There's no doubt that the Vice-President as the authority to question the validity of electoral votes. No one has ever disputed that. It's been done many times.

However, as any intelligent person knows, the Vice-President has to have a valid reason for it. He can't refuse electoral votes arbitrarily.

In 2020 Pence had no valid reason the refuse the electoral votes.

I guess the very basic concept of Democracy is beyond you.

 

[excalibur]

So if you are saying VP Harris doesn't have the ability to overturn elections, why do you morons believe Pence did, or Biden in the 2016 election, or Cheney in the 2008 election, or Gore in the 2000 election

Nobody said what you think it means because all you have is the MSM/Democrats lying to you.