Last year two Boston University professors published a law review article arguing the Vice President is the sole federal officer with discretion ...

Haha it’s his charity…he stole from himself? And what did he steal? The charity is allowed to purchase things, and he was alllowed to direct what was purchased
People donated to his charity, he only gave money to it once.

AND it is against the law to use a non profit, tax free charity to buy yourself stuff.....YOU KNOW THAT.
 
People donated to his charity, he only gave money to it once.

AND it is against the law to use a non profit, tax free charity to buy yourself stuff.....YOU KNOW THAT.
1) what’s your point?

2) where is the evidence he didn’t buy it for the charity?
 
Well, they need to be charged with something. Surely they cannot be allowed to walk around and dispute people like Bill Barr and Jack Smith.





Last year two Boston University professors published a law review article arguing the Vice President is the sole federal officer with discretion under the 12th Amendment to determine the validity of electoral vote submissions. Presumably they risk being charged with felonies now




Funny, isn't it?
 
Of course it's possible to disagree with all or part of the argument, but it's not some unhinged screed, nor would it have previously been conceivable that the argument could constitute an element of a felony conspiracy plot, which is what Jack Smith now purports to be alleging.


It's EXACTLY the kind of screed that will put Trump and his cronies in a federal prison.
 
You used the right term. Legal prosecution.
How many folks voted for this prosecutor?

:eusa_think:

1691411915629-png.812299
 
When intent is part of the law being charged with breaking,
how does ANY Prosecutor prove intent?
Honestly? Most of the American public has no idea when it comes to these high level politicians.

Did G. Bush and Cheney have intent to mislead the American public when they caused the US to kill and maim millions of people on the planet in Iraq due to their lies?

Did Hillary have intent, when she had several different phones, and had classified communications that were seen by foreign nations?

The point here, is that this prosecution, appears, to folks that support Trump, to be motivated, by politics, and not by impartial justice.


If you are a politician doing the bidding of the establishment and the clandestine agencies? Seems like you are in the clear.

If you are a populist politician that wants to do what the average American wants? The establishment will squash you like a tomato bug. IMO? The establishment would be doing the same thing to a Bernie Sanders, Ron Paul or Ross Perot, had the people managed to elect them.


This is just awful.
 

Forum List

Back
Top