Late Stage Impeach Phase: Trump Doesn’t Have to Break a Law to Be Impeached

[The Original Tree]

The cycle repeats yet again. We got nothing on Trump but we can impeach him for beating Hillary.

You don't have to break a law to be impeached. Trump's defenders need a better argument.

I laught when you assfucls claim Trump has done nothing wrong.

Mueller cited many cases of obstruction of justice.

One of the issues they got Nixon with was when Nixon tried to fie the special prosecutor.... Like Trump did with the FBI investigation and Comey.

Like trump trading US aid for dirt on a political opponent.

Things your fat asses orange buddy did.

The only problem the Democrats will have is narrowing down the list so the investigation does not take tool long.

Mueller cited ZERO recommendations for Indictment, which means there was NO Evidence of any crimes, and certainly none that any Reasonable Prosecutor would prosecute.

You got ass fucked by your own Mole. That's not our problem.

COUP 2.0 is more of the same. Nothing happened, and you are again, trying to Manufacture Evidence where none exists.

The Special Counsel in the Clinton case, recommended 13 Indictments.

Mueller recommended zero.

Sucks to be a Russian Cock Sucking Leftist Marxist Globalist these days, doesn't it Snow Flake?

Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

 

[IM2]

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

On what page?

 

[IM2]

Why is the DOJ trying to deny congress the full unredacted Mueller report?

After all, there's nothing there.

The Mueller Report Never had to be released. That was released voluntarily just like The Transcript was released. You Marxist Leftists, did not plan for The Truth defeating your Lies in COUP 1.0 and COUP 2.0.

When is Schiff going to release The Un-Redacted Transcripts of his Secret Unconstitutional Hearings?

When is COUP 3.0 going to start?

And are you an "Austere Religious Scholar?"

Actually it does when it's material to an investigation.

There were no secret unconstitutional hearings.

There is no coup.

And you are a radicalized right wing extremist.

 

[The Original Tree]

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

On what page?

On the "You Russian Marxist, ISIS Hugging, JIhadi Cock Sucking, Globalist Green New Scam Butt Rimming, Dem Nazis failed to Frame Carter Page Page.

 

[The Original Tree]

Why is the DOJ trying to deny congress the full unredacted Mueller report?

After all, there's nothing there.

The Mueller Report Never had to be released. That was released voluntarily just like The Transcript was released. You Marxist Leftists, did not plan for The Truth defeating your Lies in COUP 1.0 and COUP 2.0.

When is Schiff going to release The Un-Redacted Transcripts of his Secret Unconstitutional Hearings?

When is COUP 3.0 going to start?

And are you an "Austere Religious Scholar?"

Actually it does when it's material to an investigation.

There were no secret unconstitutional hearings.

There is no coup.

And you are a radicalized right wing extremist.

There is no Evidence, with COUP 1.0, and there is no Evidence with COUP 2.0, and that is what makes it a COUP and not a legit search for Truth which should be done out in The Open.

No President should cooperate with a COUP or Witch Hunt.

Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

 

[Faun]

I could if Trump had not obstructed justice.

What else did you lear on a Kos post?

I learned by reading the Mueller report. You read the gatewaydipshit and think that's factual reporting.

Is that why Mueller said there was no obstruction?
Even your pathetic CNN had to admit.

You’re insane.
View attachment 286836View attachment 286837
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/mueller-report-release/index.html?r=https://bing.com/

Mueller could not conclude that since the DOJ policy wouldn't allow it. Instead Mueller stated he did not exonerate Trump.

And next time don't post the Barr summary press release.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

We do not nor should congress harass a POTUS (or any American) who, after an exhaustive 2 year, $35 million SC witch-hunt was deemed to not have committed a crime.

Case closed.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."


.... because a sitting president can't be indicted.

 

[IM2]

The cycle repeats yet again. We got nothing on Trump but we can impeach him for beating Hillary.

You don't have to break a law to be impeached. Trump's defenders need a better argument.

Democrats are saying to us that impeachment isn't a legal issue. It's a political issue.

From now on the losers in Presidential elections should just vote on impeachment the day after election day....then when he's sworn in send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. That way sore-losers can go on record.

Trump has broken the law. That's why this is happening. Now you can wise up and quit falling for the lies Trump tells you, or you can sit on your ass with your mouth wide open as you hear the depth of his corruption in the upcoming weeks.

 

[mudwhistle]

The cycle repeats yet again. We got nothing on Trump but we can impeach him for beating Hillary.

You don't have to break a law to be impeached. Trump's defenders need a better argument.

I laught when you assfucls claim Trump has done nothing wrong.

Mueller cited many cases of obstruction of justice.

One of the issues they got Nixon with was when Nixon tried to fie the special prosecutor.... Like Trump did with the FBI investigation and Comey.

Like trump trading US aid for dirt on a political opponent.

Things your fat asses orange buddy did.

The only problem the Democrats will have is narrowing down the list so the investigation does not take tool long.

Mueller cited ZERO recommendations for Indictment, which means there was NO Evidence of any crimes, and certainly none that any Reasonable Prosecutor would prosecute.

You got ass fucked by your own Mole. That's not our problem.

COUP 2.0 is more of the same. Nothing happened, and you are again, trying to Manufacture Evidence where none exists.

The Special Counsel in the Clinton case, recommended 13 Indictments.

Mueller recommended zero.

Sucks to be a Russian Cock Sucking Leftist Marxist Globalist these days, doesn't it Snow Flake?

Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

Democrats scheduled an impeachment at the end of the Mueller Investigation. They wanted to time it so they could drag it out next year and dominate the news. When Mueller fell flat they hatched this cock & bull scenario.
You see, it's not what Trump did. It's how horrible they can describe what they are accusing him of doing that really matters.

They feel they control the media, so they simply make some shit up and get their corrupt media friends to repeat it till all of the simple-minded voters believe it's real. It's just a media campaign.

 

[IM2]

Why is the DOJ trying to deny congress the full unredacted Mueller report?

After all, there's nothing there.

The Mueller Report Never had to be released. That was released voluntarily just like The Transcript was released. You Marxist Leftists, did not plan for The Truth defeating your Lies in COUP 1.0 and COUP 2.0.

When is Schiff going to release The Un-Redacted Transcripts of his Secret Unconstitutional Hearings?

When is COUP 3.0 going to start?

And are you an "Austere Religious Scholar?"

Actually it does when it's material to an investigation.

There were no secret unconstitutional hearings.

There is no coup.

And you are a radicalized right wing extremist.

There is no Evidence, with COUP 1.0, and there is no Evidence with COUP 2.0, and that is what makes it a COUP and not a legit search for Truth which should be done out in The Open.

No President should cooperate with a COUP or Witch Hunt.

Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

You have the freedom in America to lie to yourself.

 

[IM2]

The cycle repeats yet again. We got nothing on Trump but we can impeach him for beating Hillary.

You don't have to break a law to be impeached. Trump's defenders need a better argument.

I laught when you assfucls claim Trump has done nothing wrong.

Mueller cited many cases of obstruction of justice.

One of the issues they got Nixon with was when Nixon tried to fie the special prosecutor.... Like Trump did with the FBI investigation and Comey.

Like trump trading US aid for dirt on a political opponent.

Things your fat asses orange buddy did.

The only problem the Democrats will have is narrowing down the list so the investigation does not take tool long.

Mueller cited ZERO recommendations for Indictment, which means there was NO Evidence of any crimes, and certainly none that any Reasonable Prosecutor would prosecute.

You got ass fucked by your own Mole. That's not our problem.

COUP 2.0 is more of the same. Nothing happened, and you are again, trying to Manufacture Evidence where none exists.

The Special Counsel in the Clinton case, recommended 13 Indictments.

Mueller recommended zero.

Sucks to be a Russian Cock Sucking Leftist Marxist Globalist these days, doesn't it Snow Flake?

Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

Democrats scheduled an impeachment at the end of the Mueller Investigation. They wanted to time it so they could drag it out next year and dominate the news. When Mueller fell flat they hatched this cock & bull scenario.
You see, it's not what Trump did. It's how horrible they can describe what they are accusing him of doing that really matters.

They feel they control the media, so they simply make some shit up and get their corrupt media friends to repeat it till all of the simple-minded voters believe it's real. It's just a media campaign.

Reality is going to strike you real soon.

 

[The Original Tree]

What else did you lear on a Kos post?

I learned by reading the Mueller report. You read the gatewaydipshit and think that's factual reporting.

Is that why Mueller said there was no obstruction?
Even your pathetic CNN had to admit.

You’re insane.
View attachment 286836View attachment 286837
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/mueller-report-release/index.html?r=https://bing.com/

Mueller could not conclude that since the DOJ policy wouldn't allow it. Instead Mueller stated he did not exonerate Trump.

And next time don't post the Barr summary press release.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

We do not nor should congress harass a POTUS (or any American) who, after an exhaustive 2 year, $35 million SC witch-hunt was deemed to not have committed a crime.

Case closed.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."


.... because a sitting president can't be indicted.

Dufus.

Mueller never said that. He said there was not enough evidence to even suggest or recommend any indictments.

The Special Counsel Recommended 13 Indictments for which Congress could write Articles of Impeachment against Clinton and this is why he underwent an Impeachment Vote, and Impeachment Trial.

You have Zero, Zilch, Nada.

How's your friend Al Baghdadi today?

 

[The Original Tree]

The cycle repeats yet again. We got nothing on Trump but we can impeach him for beating Hillary.

You don't have to break a law to be impeached. Trump's defenders need a better argument.

I laught when you assfucls claim Trump has done nothing wrong.

Mueller cited many cases of obstruction of justice.

One of the issues they got Nixon with was when Nixon tried to fie the special prosecutor.... Like Trump did with the FBI investigation and Comey.

Like trump trading US aid for dirt on a political opponent.

Things your fat asses orange buddy did.

The only problem the Democrats will have is narrowing down the list so the investigation does not take tool long.

Mueller cited ZERO recommendations for Indictment, which means there was NO Evidence of any crimes, and certainly none that any Reasonable Prosecutor would prosecute.

You got ass fucked by your own Mole. That's not our problem.

COUP 2.0 is more of the same. Nothing happened, and you are again, trying to Manufacture Evidence where none exists.

The Special Counsel in the Clinton case, recommended 13 Indictments.

Mueller recommended zero.

Sucks to be a Russian Cock Sucking Leftist Marxist Globalist these days, doesn't it Snow Flake?

Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

Democrats scheduled an impeachment at the end of the Mueller Investigation. They wanted to time it so they could drag it out next year and dominate the news. When Mueller fell flat they hatched this cock & bull scenario.
You see, it's not what Trump did. It's how horrible they can describe what they are accusing him of doing that really matters.

They feel they control the media, so they simply make some shit up and get their corrupt media friends to repeat it till all of the simple-minded voters believe it's real. It's just a media campaign.

Reality is going to strike you real soon.

Any Day Now, Judgment Day is going to strike down all Liars and cast them in to the Flaming Eternal Abyss of Hell with their Daddy, The Father of All Liars, you know him by many names, such as Lucifer, The Dark Lord, The Father of Lies, The Trickster, The Accuser, The Deceiver, and your daddy, Satan!!!

So at least you have that going for you.

 

[MisterBeale]

O.K.

Sure. . .

Prove it in such a way that the Clinton's or Al Gore or Obama weren't guilty of doing the same thing.

fer fucks sake. . . really?

I can't find any record of Clinton, Gore or Obama soliciting a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political opponent.

Of course not.

FACT CHECK: Did Republicans Pay For The Trump Dossier?

Flashback: That Time The WSJ Said The Trump Dossier Could Be A Hillary-Funded Effort

Meet the espionage firm which ordered Trump 'dirty dossier' | Daily Mail Online

https://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm

Hillary hired Fusion GPS, an American based firm. There are no laws against that.

If there are laws against, "soliciting a foreign government to dig up dirt," than hiring a company to do it for you, is analogous to saying. . . I didn't kill anyone, I only hired someone to do it for me. . . . Which, as most folks know the history of the Clintons, is pretty spot on.

Again, you are being a disingenuous piece of shit. Everyone sees right through you.

Your analogy is false. Unless you can prove Hillary hired that company with the expectation they were going to hire a foreign national, and you can't; then the appropriate analogy would be you hired someone and without your knowledge, they murdered someone.

Nope, I am sure she and the DNC are guilty.

Sorry. If they hired an incompetent law firm, too bad for them. They are still liable. It was a firm in the U.S. that should know the law. They were acting in the interests and were on retainer for their client. They are still liable.

They did not care.

 

[jc456]

From your own link;

". . . Madison objected to “maladministration.” He thought this term was so vague that it would threaten the separation of powers. Congress could remove any president it disagreed with on grounds of “maladministration.” This would give Congress complete power over the executive.. . . "

I think, at worst, the POTUS could only, at this point, be guilty of this. This is what you don't like, and refuse to admit, because these proceedings, are, in the end, just political in nature and a violation of the separation of powers.

Nope, at this point, he could be guilty of violating...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals​

O.K.

Sure. . .

Prove it in such a way that the Clinton's or Al Gore or Obama weren't guilty of doing the same thing.

fer fucks sake. . . really?

Clinton WAS impeached, idiot.
Not for taking money for favors, not for getting a blow job, but for lying under oath about getting a blow job.

Ken Starr turned over every fucking rock he could find about Clinton and finally ended up with Clinton getting a blow job.

Trump is holding out Congressionally approved funds to a country in a hot war in order to get info to benefit his fucking 2020 campaign.
Why don't you redneck idiots SEE THIS?
It's right in front of you.
Mick Mulvaney ADMITTED TO IT ON CAMERA.
Trump released the TRANSCRIPT with "I need a favor, though."
Why did he do that?
Because somebody inside that White House got it through his thick skull that if it can be proved, he wouldn't want to be impeached for lying under oath.

isn't that what biden did with urkraine? I mean really, are you going to out yourself that easily? I hope so, but still, we have it on video in here about fifty times now. need again? I'm happy to post that idiot bragging about his quid pro quo. here anyway, please show all your hypocrisy

isn't that what biden did with urkraine?

No, retard.

sure he did, he held money until the prosecutor was fired. he said it. are you denying he said it? just wondering. hmmmmm wow, you all can't even follow a video feed of a man admitting quid pro quo.

 

[Faun]

I learned by reading the Mueller report. You read the gatewaydipshit and think that's factual reporting.

Is that why Mueller said there was no obstruction?
Even your pathetic CNN had to admit.

You’re insane.
View attachment 286836View attachment 286837
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/mueller-report-release/index.html?r=https://bing.com/

Mueller could not conclude that since the DOJ policy wouldn't allow it. Instead Mueller stated he did not exonerate Trump.

And next time don't post the Barr summary press release.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

We do not nor should congress harass a POTUS (or any American) who, after an exhaustive 2 year, $35 million SC witch-hunt was deemed to not have committed a crime.

Case closed.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."


.... because a sitting president can't be indicted.

Dufus.

Mueller never said that. He said there was not enough evidence to even suggest or recommend any indictments.

The Special Counsel Recommended 13 Indictments for which Congress could write Articles of Impeachment against Clinton and this is why he underwent an Impeachment Vote, and Impeachment Trial.

You have Zero, Zilch, Nada.

How's your friend Al Baghdadi today?

LOL

Of course Mueller said that, ya brain-dead cultist...

“We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted.” - Robert Mueller​

 

[Faun]

Is that why Mueller said there was no obstruction?
Even your pathetic CNN had to admit.

You’re insane.
View attachment 286836View attachment 286837
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/mueller-report-release/index.html?r=https://bing.com/

How many times do you why that is the case...

Mueller was not accusing someone who was not afforded the right of reply...

He left the evidence to speak for itself and the evidence is damning and could be easily prosecuted if the President was open for such a charge...

The case was too complicated for the public (but more important ) unlike the Ukraine case... Ukraine was a shakedown and Public have seen enough mob shakedowns on TV...

The President looks pretty guilty of soliciting a bribe from Ukraine...

A simpler version is that the collusion with the Russians in 16 was difficult to prove while the collusion with the Ukranians for 20 was outrightly admitted.

There was no collusion. Not sure what you are talking about. Asking about an ongoing investigation in to The Obama Administration, and Biden and Clinton working to overturn the 2016 election through Foreign Actors and Russian spies is a legitimate question and is part of The President's job with regards to Foreign Policy and Political Corruption Cooperation Agreements that we have with countries like The Ukraine.

Indeed, the POTUS is head of our justice system and we do have a signed (by Prez Clinton) treaty with The Ukraine. If Trump had reason to believe Biden had used his position and/or US tax $$$ to extort personal benefit, he'd be remiss in his duties in not asking for help exposing it.

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

Ah, finally.... someone who can tell the forum who was investigating Biden.

So? Who was it...?

<crickets>

 

[Weatherman2020]

Is that why Mueller said there was no obstruction?
Even your pathetic CNN had to admit.

You’re insane.
View attachment 286836View attachment 286837
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/mueller-report-release/index.html?r=https://bing.com/

Mueller could not conclude that since the DOJ policy wouldn't allow it. Instead Mueller stated he did not exonerate Trump.

And next time don't post the Barr summary press release.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

We do not nor should congress harass a POTUS (or any American) who, after an exhaustive 2 year, $35 million SC witch-hunt was deemed to not have committed a crime.

Case closed.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."


.... because a sitting president can't be indicted.

Dufus.

Mueller never said that. He said there was not enough evidence to even suggest or recommend any indictments.

The Special Counsel Recommended 13 Indictments for which Congress could write Articles of Impeachment against Clinton and this is why he underwent an Impeachment Vote, and Impeachment Trial.

You have Zero, Zilch, Nada.

How's your friend Al Baghdadi today?

LOL

Of course Mueller said that, ya brain-dead cultist...

“We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted.” - Robert Mueller​

Mueller Mueller Mueller!


You freaks have lost it. You can’t even keep up with your bullshit. Get with it, shitforbrains. It’s now Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine!

 

[The Original Tree]

Is that why Mueller said there was no obstruction?
Even your pathetic CNN had to admit.

You’re insane.
View attachment 286836View attachment 286837
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/mueller-report-release/index.html?r=https://bing.com/

Mueller could not conclude that since the DOJ policy wouldn't allow it. Instead Mueller stated he did not exonerate Trump.

And next time don't post the Barr summary press release.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

We do not nor should congress harass a POTUS (or any American) who, after an exhaustive 2 year, $35 million SC witch-hunt was deemed to not have committed a crime.

Case closed.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."


.... because a sitting president can't be indicted.

Dufus.

Mueller never said that. He said there was not enough evidence to even suggest or recommend any indictments.

The Special Counsel Recommended 13 Indictments for which Congress could write Articles of Impeachment against Clinton and this is why he underwent an Impeachment Vote, and Impeachment Trial.

You have Zero, Zilch, Nada.

How's your friend Al Baghdadi today?

LOL

Of course Mueller said that, ya brain-dead cultist...

“We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted.” - Robert Mueller​

Mueller said there is No Evidence, and that is why you had to Move on to Impeachment Hoax 2.0 and soon to move on to Impeachment Hoax 3.0.

The President is standing in the way of your Globalist - Marxist - Socialist Green New Hell!

When is Mueller going to do another hearing?


Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

 

[Faun]

I can't find any record of Clinton, Gore or Obama soliciting a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political opponent.

Of course not.

FACT CHECK: Did Republicans Pay For The Trump Dossier?

Flashback: That Time The WSJ Said The Trump Dossier Could Be A Hillary-Funded Effort

Meet the espionage firm which ordered Trump 'dirty dossier' | Daily Mail Online

https://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm

Hillary hired Fusion GPS, an American based firm. There are no laws against that.

If there are laws against, "soliciting a foreign government to dig up dirt," than hiring a company to do it for you, is analogous to saying. . . I didn't kill anyone, I only hired someone to do it for me. . . . Which, as most folks know the history of the Clintons, is pretty spot on.

Again, you are being a disingenuous piece of shit. Everyone sees right through you.

Your analogy is false. Unless you can prove Hillary hired that company with the expectation they were going to hire a foreign national, and you can't; then the appropriate analogy would be you hired someone and without your knowledge, they murdered someone.

Nope, I am sure she and the DNC are guilty.

Sorry. If they hired an incompetent law firm, too bad for them. They are still liable. It was a firm in the U.S. that should know the law. They were acting in the interests and were on retainer for their client. They are still liable.

They did not care.

LOLOL

Who cares what you're "sure" about.

Prove it....

 

[Weatherman2020]

Mueller could not conclude that since the DOJ policy wouldn't allow it. Instead Mueller stated he did not exonerate Trump.

And next time don't post the Barr summary press release.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."

We do not nor should congress harass a POTUS (or any American) who, after an exhaustive 2 year, $35 million SC witch-hunt was deemed to not have committed a crime.

Case closed.

Mueller said, and I quote: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime."


.... because a sitting president can't be indicted.

Dufus.

Mueller never said that. He said there was not enough evidence to even suggest or recommend any indictments.

The Special Counsel Recommended 13 Indictments for which Congress could write Articles of Impeachment against Clinton and this is why he underwent an Impeachment Vote, and Impeachment Trial.

You have Zero, Zilch, Nada.

How's your friend Al Baghdadi today?

LOL

Of course Mueller said that, ya brain-dead cultist...

“We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted.” - Robert Mueller​

Mueller said there is No Evidence, and that is why you had to Move on to Impeachment Hoax 2.0 and soon to move on to Impeachment Hoax 3.0.

The President is standing in the way of your Globalist, Marxist, Socialist Green New Hell!

When is Mueller going to do another hearing?


Fake Impeachment 2.0 Isn't really about Trump or any wrong doing at all.

Don’t forget Stormy! IMPEACHMENT 4.0