Laura Ingraham gives insincere apology after mocking shooting survivors AFTER ads pulled.

[mudwhistle]

Which of these actions rises to the level of a personal "attack"? A two sentence Tweet poking David Hogg about not being accepted to some colleges OR Hogg mobilizing a sponsor boycott against Ingraham using the power of his new fame?

Apparently the little twerp doesn't have a sense of humor.

I figure words can't hurt you.

Camera Hogg thinks he can ruin lives just because they make fun of his activities. Must be one of those million Barack Obamas the former president talked about creating.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Which of these actions rises to the level of a personal "attack"? A two sentence Tweet poking David Hogg about not being accepted to some colleges OR Hogg mobilizing a sponsor boycott against Ingraham using the power of his new fame?

Apparently the little twerp doesn't have a sense of humor.

I figure words can't hurt you.

Camera Hogg thinks he can ruin lives just because they make fun of his activities. Must be one of those million Barack Obamas the former president talked about creating.

Ingraham had enough sense to know she had stepped in it.

 

[Indeependent]

You’re into revisionist history?

No revisionism. Except for Goabells his inner circle was made up of poorly educated thugs.

Hitler’s Final Solution board was comprised of PhDs.

What "board" are you talking about? Are you referring to the Wannsee Conference? Only the bureaucrats were educated with degrees. Leaders who surrounded Hitler were poorly educated thugs. Heydrich, Himmler, Goering, Eichmann, etc. were not formally educated.

I am fully aware that Hitler’s very closest propaganda pals were uneducated.

You are a bull slinger who knows very little about Hitler and WWII history. You are trying ro bluff your way through. Hitlers Propaganda minister, Goebbels was the one person in his inner circle who had a degree. Rest of his inner circle had nothing to do with propaganda other than carrying out the orders of Goebbels and Hitler.

Sure.
The Final Solution.

 

[Indeependent]

So I guess you disapprove of Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Citibank, etc...

Are they Social Welfare Orgs? No - Your point?

They contribute to our “Representatives” and influence legislation.

You've just made my point for me. NRA needs to lose their Social Welfare Org status and come clean about who they are and whom they represent.

I suppose you mean the same for every entity that contributes more than the average person.
In that case, I agree with you.

 

[Tilly]

She was insincere?
Good

 

[mudwhistle]

Which of these actions rises to the level of a personal "attack"? A two sentence Tweet poking David Hogg about not being accepted to some colleges OR Hogg mobilizing a sponsor boycott against Ingraham using the power of his new fame?

Characterizing his comment as "whining" was a personal attack. Hogg forced an apology by "hitting back", as Trumpkins call it. What did Hogg say about Ingraham?

He said she was disgusting amongst other things.

He also mentioned that as a journalist Laura Ingraham should show both sides of the story. When does CNN ever do that?

CNN Host To Hogg — Ingraham Is Conservative Talk Show Host, She's Not Objective ⋆ WayneDupree.com

 

[mudwhistle]

So I guess you disapprove of Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Citibank, etc...

Are they Social Welfare Orgs? No - Your point?

They contribute to our “Representatives” and influence legislation.

You've just made my point for me. NRA needs to lose their Social Welfare Org status and come clean about who they are and whom they represent.

WTF is "Social Welfare Organization Status"?

 

[mudwhistle]

Which of these actions rises to the level of a personal "attack"? A two sentence Tweet poking David Hogg about not being accepted to some colleges OR Hogg mobilizing a sponsor boycott against Ingraham using the power of his new fame?

Apparently the little twerp doesn't have a sense of humor.

I figure words can't hurt you.

Camera Hogg thinks he can ruin lives just because they make fun of his activities. Must be one of those million Barack Obamas the former president talked about creating.

Ingraham had enough sense to know she had stepped in it.

Not really.
This only proves what we're saying about this little prick.

He's being propped up by George Soros who runs Media Matters.

 

[DrLove]

WTF is "Social Welfare Organization Status"?

I already provided the link - catch up

FACT CHECK: Is the NRA a Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Organization?

 

[mudwhistle]

WTF is "Social Welfare Organization Status"?

I already provided the link - catch up

FACT CHECK: Is the NRA a Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Organization?

I know about non-profits.

 

[Coyote]

She's nasty.

Right wingers follow the dirtiest of people.

Then insist they are moral and follow Christ.

How do they have the nerve.

She made fun of survivors of a mass shooting.

Who does that? Besides right wingers? What kind of people do such things?

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

 

[mudwhistle]

She's nasty.

Right wingers follow the dirtiest of people.

Then insist they are moral and follow Christ.

How do they have the nerve.

She made fun of survivors of a mass shooting.

Who does that? Besides right wingers? What kind of people do such things?

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

 

[Coyote]

She's nasty.

Right wingers follow the dirtiest of people.

Then insist they are moral and follow Christ.

How do they have the nerve.

She made fun of survivors of a mass shooting.

Who does that? Besides right wingers? What kind of people do such things?

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

 

[mudwhistle]

She's nasty.

Right wingers follow the dirtiest of people.

Then insist they are moral and follow Christ.

How do they have the nerve.

She made fun of survivors of a mass shooting.

Who does that? Besides right wingers? What kind of people do such things?

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

 

[Coyote]

She's nasty.

Right wingers follow the dirtiest of people.

Then insist they are moral and follow Christ.

How do they have the nerve.

She made fun of survivors of a mass shooting.

Who does that? Besides right wingers? What kind of people do such things?

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance. They aren't rioting. They aren't assaulting people. They aren't burning things down. They aren't exposing the private information of their opponents in the manner Ingraham and others are doing and using it against them. They are sticking to their principles and behaving in a far more adult manner than their opponents. The ones who are SUPPOSED to be adults.

But this is the new norm isn't it? This is the new standard of conduct people are embracing.

 

[mudwhistle]

She's nasty.

Right wingers follow the dirtiest of people.

Then insist they are moral and follow Christ.

How do they have the nerve.

She made fun of survivors of a mass shooting.

Who does that? Besides right wingers? What kind of people do such things?

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance. They aren't rioting. They aren't assaulting people. They aren't burning things down. They aren't exposing the private information of their opponents in the manner Ingraham and others are doing and using it against them. They are sticking to their principles and behaving in a far more adult manner than their opponents. The ones who are SUPPOSED to be adults.

But this is the new norm isn't it? This is the new standard of conduct people are embracing.

This little fuck is trying to cause people to lose their jobs.
He lost his victim status the moment he started attacking anyone who criticized his fucked up statements.
Before this is over they're gonna need a security detail to keep him from getting his ass beat by the people he's pissing off.

 

[Coyote]

She is nasty.

But this kind of nasty has become the new "norm" it would seem. And it's not a rightwinger only norm.

The fact is - we as a society seem to be encouraging it, excusing it, applauding it.

Glad she is losing sponsors over it. Maybe she will learn to attack the positions, not the people. A grown woman attacking a highschool kid like that is shameful.

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance. They aren't rioting. They aren't assaulting people. They aren't burning things down. They aren't exposing the private information of their opponents in the manner Ingraham and others are doing and using it against them. They are sticking to their principles and behaving in a far more adult manner than their opponents. The ones who are SUPPOSED to be adults.

But this is the new norm isn't it? This is the new standard of conduct people are embracing.

This little fuck is trying to cause people to lose their jobs.
He lost his victim status the moment he started attacking anyone who criticized his fucked up statements.
Before this is over they're gonna need a security detail to keep him from getting his ass beat by the people he's pissing off.

Who's jobs is he attacking?

 

[mudwhistle]

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance. They aren't rioting. They aren't assaulting people. They aren't burning things down. They aren't exposing the private information of their opponents in the manner Ingraham and others are doing and using it against them. They are sticking to their principles and behaving in a far more adult manner than their opponents. The ones who are SUPPOSED to be adults.

But this is the new norm isn't it? This is the new standard of conduct people are embracing.

This little fuck is trying to cause people to lose their jobs.
He lost his victim status the moment he started attacking anyone who criticized his fucked up statements.
Before this is over they're gonna need a security detail to keep him from getting his ass beat by the people he's pissing off.

Who's jobs is he attacking?

Besides Laura Ingraham's???

 

[Coyote]

Such rightwing hypocrisy here....they didn't attack these kids for taking political stances did they? Nothing about their grades, gpa or college applications...no criticism of nefarious funding and powers controlling them....

Don’t Be Fooled by Stoneman Douglas Reactions. Conservatives Love Political Teens.

On Thursday, Shapiro will address hundreds of young student members of YAF and other organizations at the Conservative Political Action Conference, which is, at this point, a kind of Boy Scout jamboree for youngsters who spent puberty getting hot and bothered over the prospect of ending affirmative action. One of the newer and more influential groups in attendance will be Turning Point USA, founded by young conservative activist Charlie Kirk when he was 18. While the group is perhaps best known for its diaper play in protest of safe spaces at Kent State University, Turning Point also has chapters at high schools across the country and recently hosted a “leadership summit” specifically for high school students. Its ballooning funds have come from a constellation of right-wing donors including the foundations of Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, shipping magnate Richard Uihlein, and Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus, as well as the financial investor Foster Friess.


Young, supposedly precocious voices like Shapiro’s have proved deeply important to the modern conservative movement since at least 1960.

All of this begins to take on the whiff of the unethical if, as Shapiro says, we’re to recoil at young people being used to push the agendas of savvy adults. And indeed, every now and then, prominent young voices in the world of conservative activism exit queasily. Take Jonathan Krohn, who, at 13, addressed CPAC to high praise from the conservative press in 2009. “I want you to understand, I want the American people to understand, that conservatism is not an ideology of feelings—romanticism as some people like to say,” he told the audience. “It is an ideology of protecting the people and the people’s rights.” A barrage of guest appearances on Fox News and a New York Times profile shortly followed. “Young master Krohn is a conservative who clearly has a future,” Fox political correspondent Carl Cameron said in a segment about Krohn. “He is at this point working on more projects, and you’d better tell the Beltway boys to watch out.” By 2012, Krohn had abandoned the ideology of the people’s rights. That summer he told Politico he had “matured” and had gotten into both gay marriage and Wittgenstein. “It’s a 13-year-old kid saying stuff that he had heard for a long time,” he said. “Come on, I was thirteen. I was thirteen.”


Or take C.J. Pearson, a 12-year-old who taped a viral anti-Obama rant and endorsed Rand Paul for the presidency in 2015. Pearson’s switch to supporting Ted Cruz and subsequent criticisms of Paul were called an “abrupt betrayal” by a RedState blogger who presumably went into cardiac arrest following Pearson’s denunciation of the Republican Party that November. “I was tired of being a champion of a party that turned a blind eye to racial discrimination,” he told CNN. “Tired of being a champion of any cause that denies equal rights to every American. Tired of being a champion of a party that doesn’t care about the issues important to young people.” “What’s the real issue here are the many conservatives who decided it was a good idea to make Pearson a public face of the Right,” the Daily Caller’s Scott Greer wrote afterward. “Maybe conservatives have internalized the liberal line that they’re just a bunch of stuffy, old white men and they’ll take any voice that breaks the stereotype. Or maybe conservatives feel they need a silly gimmick to sell their ideas.” ​

 

[Coyote]

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance. They aren't rioting. They aren't assaulting people. They aren't burning things down. They aren't exposing the private information of their opponents in the manner Ingraham and others are doing and using it against them. They are sticking to their principles and behaving in a far more adult manner than their opponents. The ones who are SUPPOSED to be adults.

But this is the new norm isn't it? This is the new standard of conduct people are embracing.

This little fuck is trying to cause people to lose their jobs.
He lost his victim status the moment he started attacking anyone who criticized his fucked up statements.
Before this is over they're gonna need a security detail to keep him from getting his ass beat by the people he's pissing off.

Who's jobs is he attacking?

Besides Laura Ingraham's???

Wait - so she bears no responsibility for what she said? She is just a helpless pawn and someone stuffed those words in her mouth? And if she loses her job it's Hoggs fault?