Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

[shockedcanadian]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

 

[TNHarley]

Even if, they are a private org. They can do what they want.
Their members are the dumbfucks.

 

[The Derp]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Letting Sanders run for their primary was a colossal mistake. He has never been a Democrat for even a second of his life.

 

[JBond]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

Liberals have always done as they are told. Not a very bright bunch.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.

 

[ColonelAngus]

You GOTTA love the LIARS in DC.

The DNC CLAIMS to the PUBLIC that the DNC primaries were legitimate elections.

Then the DNC argues in court that they RIGGED THE ELECTIONS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALLOWED TO!!!!

Fucking grabastic pieces of shit.

 

[The Derp]

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

That's pretty much the system as it exists today anyway. It won't change until we remove money from political campaigns and move to an entirely, 100% publicly-financed system with a ban on PACs, donations, and fundraising.

 

[The Derp]

The DNC CLAIMS to the PUBLIC that the DNC primaries were legitimate elections.

Parties can run their primaries however they want.

Then the DNC argues in court that they RIGGED THE ELECTIONS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALLOWED TO!!!!Fucking grabastic pieces of shit.

They tilted the primary, but not the election. You are conflating the primary with the general election because your argument that the DNC rigged the primary for Clinton only goes so far.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Why is a Canadian posting fake news to a US forum? Are you a paid operative for the Russians?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[del]

no more ridiculous than money as speech

 

[JBond]

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

That's pretty much the system as it exists today anyway. It won't change until we remove money from political campaigns and move to an entirely, 100% publicly-financed system with a ban on PACs, donations, and fundraising.

You clowns hate the 2nd Admendment and now you want to trash the 1st. Idiots.

 

[shockedcanadian]

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

That's pretty much the system as it exists today anyway. It won't change until we remove money from political campaigns and move to an entirely, 100% publicly-financed sy
stem with a ban on PACs, donations, and fundraising.

If that were true Jeb Bush would have been the GOP nominee.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Why is a Canadian posting fake news to a US forum? Are you a paid operative for the Russians?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Did I invade your Safe Space?

The Russians couldn't afford me pal. I wouldn't sell out cheap to a Commie.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Why is a Canadian posting fake news to a US forum? Are you a paid operative for the Russians?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Did I invade your Safe Space?

The Russians couldn't afford me pal. I wouldn't sell out cheap to a Commie.

So you post lies and fake news just for the shits and grins of it?

You are wasting your talents, you should get paid for doing it


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[The Derp]

You clowns hate the 2nd Admendment and now you want to trash the 1st. Idiots.

If money = speech then there's no such thing as free speech, and some people have more speech than others...which is antithetical to our form of democracy.

 

[The Derp]

The Russians couldn't afford me pal. I wouldn't sell out cheap to a Commie.

Right!? You're not Donald Trump for Chrissakes!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

And Dems cheat in theirs

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why even bother having a primary and pretending that people will get to pick a candidate?

 

[The Derp]

And Dems cheat in theirs

And? If you are so concerned with the integrity of our primaries then you should be supporting an entirely publicly-funded campaign system with a 100% ban on all political donations and fundraising.

Do you support that? Probably not. So you're just trolling.