Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Why is a Canadian posting fake news to a US forum? Are you a paid operative for the Russians?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
so that is fake news? just so I'm clear your position on this, so I can call you a liar later.
 
I respect and believe in the Constitution.

I don't believe you know the first thing about the Constitution because I believe you to be a Russian troll.

According to Mueller, Russian trolls were actively creating fake profiles across social media beginning in 2014. Your profile is from 2016 and you repeat Russian propaganda here.

^ Posted by Sock # 23,687 from the Stats & Starkey Media Matters Internet Outreach Center for Political Awareness
 
Clearly, having the public spend money on a pretend DNC primary is a waste of money when the DNC just announces their selected candidate.

So then you don't support an end to political donations and fundraising.

So then all you're doing here is trolling.
 
Posted by Sock # 23,687 from the Stats & Starkey Media Matters Internet Outreach Center for Political Awareness

Conservatives have to rely on Russian trolls to spread their message because so few people actually agree with it.

It's why Trump lost the popular vote by 3,000,000.
 
I respect and believe in the Constitution.

I don't believe you know the first thing about the Constitution because I believe you to be a Russian troll.

According to Mueller, Russian trolls were actively creating fake profiles across social media beginning in 2014. Your profile is from 2016 and you repeat Russian propaganda here.
Lol. You caught me...

Fucking idiot. Russians are a problem, especially when the DNC is purchasing info from Kremlin agents.
 
Posted by Sock # 23,687 from the Stats & Starkey Media Matters Internet Outreach Center for Political Awareness

Conservatives have to rely on Russian trolls to spread their message because so few people actually agree with it.

It's why Trump lost the popular vote by 3,000,000.

Show us on the doll where the Russian trolls touched you to make you vote for Trump
 
Fucking idiot. Russians are a problem, especially when the DNC is purchasing info from Kremlin agents.

Never happened, but Trump has to get money from Russian agents because no US bank will lend to him.
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.
everyone at the RNC would be in jail, if it were illegal....

they actually did fight tooth and nail AGAINST Trump in the primary.... :rolleyes:
But did they rig it against him?
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Why is a Canadian posting fake news to a US forum? Are you a paid operative for the Russians?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
so that is fake news? just so I'm clear your position on this, so I can call you a liar later.

It is very simple, if you read the actual court document it does not say what the article claims it does. But these sites count on you sheep not taking the time to check for yourself


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
If you voted for the candidate from the RIGGED primary, and you thought that candidate and party has any ethics, you are a fucking idiot.
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.
everyone at the RNC would be in jail, if it were illegal....

they actually did fight tooth and nail AGAINST Trump in the primary.... :rolleyes:
But did they rig it against him?

What rules did the DNC break? If no rules were broken then there was no rigging


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Fucking idiot. Russians are a problem, especially when the DNC is purchasing info from Kremlin agents.

Never happened, but Trump has to get money from Russian agents because no US bank will lend to him.
Why lie about it? It happened. They tried every dirty trick and still failed. Stop buying info from the Russian intelligence. Steele told everyone where his info came from.
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.
everyone at the RNC would be in jail, if it were illegal....

they actually did fight tooth and nail AGAINST Trump in the primary.... :rolleyes:
But did they rig it against him?

What rules did the DNC break? If no rules were broken then there was no rigging


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
then why did debbie get fired?
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Why is a Canadian posting fake news to a US forum? Are you a paid operative for the Russians?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
so that is fake news? just so I'm clear your position on this, so I can call you a liar later.

It is very simple, if you read the actual court document it does not say what the article claims it does. But these sites count on you sheep not taking the time to check for yourself


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
it says it appears to argue..... again, thanks for the lie. we appreciate it.
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.
everyone at the RNC would be in jail, if it were illegal....

they actually did fight tooth and nail AGAINST Trump in the primary.... :rolleyes:
But did they rig it against him?

What rules did the DNC break? If no rules were broken then there was no rigging

Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

right.

we need to stop making excuses for bad behavior all around.
 
You GOTTA love the LIARS in DC.

The DNC CLAIMS to the PUBLIC that the DNC primaries were legitimate elections.

Then the DNC argues in court that they RIGGED THE ELECTIONS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALLOWED TO!!!!

Fucking grabastic pieces of shit.
There was no rigging. Rules were in place long before Bernie decided to ruin. If you are so interested into rigging, talk to your orange buddy & his cohorts the Russians.

I laugh my ass off at you Trumpettes trying to misdirect our attention from the fact the Russians interfered in our election to help YOUR candidate win.

So what quality 0f Trump did you & the Russians think was worthy of him being President?


Well then, you accept the anointed claim then, it's quite accurate, and again, VERY Canadian of you.

I wouldn't be surprised if in the DNC Primaries for 2020 there isn't even a challenger. Just one person who get the thumbs up from the Queen and off you go. Hell, Clinton made sure to eliminate her only female challenger for the debates and damn near didn't have one in Bernie. They assumed it would make her look more legitimate and remain "sharp" for the G.E election debates to have this old socialist candidate go toe to toe with her, even though they KNEW he could get 90% of the votes, and it wouldn't matter as the Super Delegates would handle the job. They were shocked to find out that he actually had a chance and caused some headaches for her.

That should have been a sign of what was going on. A vibrant democracy requires vibrant, lively debate and competition. You haven't seen and know what I know about socialism and centralized power, you had better wake up. I'm telling you, America will cease to exist if you allow these International crooks to steal your election. No, NOT Russia, that was childs play compared to the shyte Obama and Clinton were engaging in.

One final note, and it's more important than the others; you have thousands of American men and women in uniform, risking their lives everyday for your Republic. You owe it to them and their family to put the partisan shyte away, and embrace the election results. Some of you are just as bad as the International socialists who love to see America break apart. Next time you see a casket with an American flag draped over it, think about what it is they lost their lives for.

I realize as a Canadian your knowledge of US history is lacking, so let me help you out.

The current primary system for choosing nominees is fairly new in American politics. For the greater part of of history the parties choose the nominee with no input from the masses, and yet our democracy still thrived, and was arguably stronger then than now.
So, your little “sky is falling” speech is lacking in reality.

Also, I was one of those men in uniform for 20 years, so I do not think some outsider who never wore the uniform should be lecturing those of us who did


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top