Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

[easyt65]

Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

According To Democrats:

A DEMOCRAT rigging a primary is justifiable and morally okay.

A DEMOCRAT cheating in debates is justifiable and morally okay.

A DEMOCRAT perpetrating election fraud is justifiable and morally okay.

A DEMOCRAT violating election laws is justifiable and morally okay.

A DEMOCRAT violating campaign finance laws is justifiable and morally okay.

A DEMOCRAT colluding with and paying foreign spies and Russians to help them illegally alter the outcome of an election is justifiable and morally okay.

To be totally fair, since the DNC is a private Party that has a membership that party can legally do whatever they want ... IN REGARDS TO RIGGING THEIR PRIMARIES, IN REGARDS TO HELPING A CANDIDATE C HEAT IN ONE OF THEIR SPONSORED / RUN DEBATES, AND POTENTIALLLY EVEN BY PERPETRATING WHAT WOULD NORMALLY BE CALLED 'ELECTION FRAUD' BY PUTTING THEIR FINGER ON THE BALLOTING SCALES.

What the DNC and Hillary can NOT LEGALLY DO, but did anyway, was to violate election laws, violate campaign finance laws, and illegally use foreign opposition research they PAID FOR from foreign sources...ie the foreign spies and Russians Hillary paid for the unverified dossier (that the FBI used illegally to obtain FISA Court warrants).