Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

If you voted for the candidate from the RIGGED primary, and you thought that candidate and party has any ethics, you are a fucking idiot.
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
not rigged.
 
If you voted for the candidate from the RIGGED primary, and you thought that candidate and party has any ethics, you are a fucking idiot.
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?
well exactly, and really the argument should be those who donated to Bernie thinking it was a fair election, they wasted their money and should sue for it back. It was a conspiracy to commit something against their own base. truly sad fks on the left, truly.

Exactly...the DNC literally stole from Bernie Supporters who thought it was a fair election....which is why they sued.
 
Which does not in anyway speak of rigging anything.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
but it is what the OP was about. so again, the defense appears to argue, and that is exactly what they argued. so there is nothing wrong with the OP and makes you the liar.

It only appears that way to brainless partisans, so yes they lied.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
not they, .......you lied. it was the argument. so, again, proven to you that again you lied.

An argument based on a fake reading of the document. Which makes the argument fake, sort of like you are being now


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
no, I posted from the court ruling. so it is you lying actually. let's don't create a document that doesn't exist for your gratification of something. the facts follow the OP. so it is you that is lying.


So, if is post a quote from you and then make up what that post means, I would not be lying since I had the quote from you?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
What does the National Popular vote have to do with the Presidential Election?

Nothing other than showing who was the more popular candidate. You guys just can't seem to let that go. And bringing it up undermines your claims that Trump has support for his and the GOP's Russian agenda.


You keep on screaming " Russian Trolls " and how so many have no clue about the U.S. Constitution and yet you keep on bringing up the Popular vote that was actually swayed to Clinton favor because of California.

Russian trolls disseminated propaganda in the closing months of the general election that revolved around a controversy of Hillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server and the "deletion" of 33,000 e-mails from that private server. What you've been unable to do is provide any kind of support for any kind of claims that those 33,000 e-mails were anything of import or were consequential to anything. Russian trolls knew that, but wanted to create a fog of controversy because they knew it would be easy to manipulate Conservatives because you all have been manipulated by the Conservative elite for 38 years.


So tell me why is it those like you are fixated on the popular vote when you damn well know the President is elected by the Electoral College or are you one of those Russian trolls trying to divert attention from you?

I'm not fixated on the popular vote, but Trump is. Bringing up the fact that Clinton won the popular vote serves only one purpose; to point out that Trump never got a mandate and his ideas and beliefs weren't the majority view of the country. That you and your fellow duped fools govern from a position of weakness because you lack popular support for anything you want to do, anything you say, and anything you believe.


Oh, before you claim I am one ( Russian Troll ), well it is true I am a troll from the Slate days that went by the name " Nanu " and have been trolling boards since 2002 but I am not some fucking Ruskie!

So, not sure why you'd admit to being a troll since that will result in me reporting you and you losing your account because of trolling.
 
If you voted for the candidate from the RIGGED primary, and you thought that candidate and party has any ethics, you are a fucking idiot.
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
not rigged.

Pleas list the rules the DNC broke. If there were no broken rules, it cannot be rigged


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
If you voted for the candidate from the RIGGED primary, and you thought that candidate and party has any ethics, you are a fucking idiot.
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
to see which candidate best represents my views and who i want to run for president.
 
If so why in hell did you vote for Hillary?

Because Trump is a fascist and Republicans are racist losers.


Also think of this and Jill Stein of the Green Party along with voters staying home in swing states cost Hillary more votes than any Russian influence...

Russians bolstered Jill Stein. It was part of their strategy. They formed fake Facebook groups, posing as minorities, to try and convince real minorities to vote against Clinton. It's all spelled out in Mueller's indictment of 13 Russians for meddling in the election. Maybe read that so you don't end up looking like an uninformed goofball here.


Maybe had voters in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan gotten off their lazy ass and voted, well your candidate would have won...So run a candidate that could win in swing states and if not, well enjoy losing...

Of course if turnout was higher, Trump would have lost. I've been arguing since the beginning that trying to win over Trump voters is stupid and pointless, and instead we should focus GOTV efforts on non-voters.
 
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
not rigged.

Pleas list the rules the DNC broke. If there were no broken rules, it cannot be rigged


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
there is going to come a time this is used against you and my bet is at that time, you have a different reason to be right.

the problem with setting stupid precedents is that people usually hate it when it works against their views so they come up with lame ass reasons to justify why their situation "is different"
 
If you voted for the candidate from the RIGGED primary, and you thought that candidate and party has any ethics, you are a fucking idiot.
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
to see which candidate best represents my views and who i want to run for president.

Then the purpose of the primary is not defeated. You are free to do that in the primary, just do not expect the party to agree with your choice


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.

You miss the point. Sanders wasn’t “their” candidate. He’s not a Democrat, nor has he ever been one. Sanders is an independent who tried to co-opt the resources and organization of the Democratic Party and their campaign funds to launch an independent run for the Presidency.

It’s hardly surprising that they didn’t want him there.
 
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
to see which candidate best represents my views and who i want to run for president.

Then the purpose of the primary is not defeated. You are free to do that in the primary, just do not expect the party to agree with your choice

Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow.

most stupid thing i've read this decade.
 
Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
to see which candidate best represents my views and who i want to run for president.

Then the purpose of the primary is not defeated. You are free to do that in the primary, just do not expect the party to agree with your choice

Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow.

most stupid thing i've read this decade.

Thanks, I always like to be number 1.

But the fact remains that the party having a favorite does not in any way alter your stated purpose of the primary.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
I don't mind if the DNC rigs their primaries.....JUST DON'T FUCKING LIE ABOUT IT.

They should have DECLARED IN JUNE 2015 THAT HILLARY WAS THE NOMINEE.

PERIOD.

How can anyone even argue that point?
 
And Dems cheat in theirs

And? If you are so concerned with the integrity of our primaries then you should be supporting an entirely publicly-funded campaign system with a 100% ban on all political donations and fundraising.

Do you support that? Probably not. So you're just trolling.

they are only concerned with the "integrity" of the democratic primary.... which they think should somehow have gone to someone who isn't a registered democrat.

they're so cute that way.

I'm not concerned at all about how you conduct your crooked Primaries

Smoke%2BFilled%2BRoom.jpg


DNC Meeting

"Great news, gentlemen! The votes have been counted and the winner is whoever the fuck we say it is!"
 
if you voted for Hillary and you know she rigged the DNC primaries, you voted for someone you KNOW has lied to you and is unethical.

it tells you all you need to know about hillary voters.
 
but it is what the OP was about. so again, the defense appears to argue, and that is exactly what they argued. so there is nothing wrong with the OP and makes you the liar.

It only appears that way to brainless partisans, so yes they lied.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
not they, .......you lied. it was the argument. so, again, proven to you that again you lied.

An argument based on a fake reading of the document. Which makes the argument fake, sort of like you are being now


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
no, I posted from the court ruling. so it is you lying actually. let's don't create a document that doesn't exist for your gratification of something. the facts follow the OP. so it is you that is lying.


So, if is post a quote from you and then make up what that post means, I would not be lying since I had the quote from you?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
huh? seems you are backed into a corner. strawmanning me now?
 
Actually., I am smart enough to know how the Democrat Party nominated their President candidates.

The Democtrats can choose to pick their candidates any way they want. They opted for a system with super delegates. Everyone knew this. Bernie knew this.

Both partires try to get the losing candidates to drop out when the outcome is known.

Too bad you are such a fucking moron. You voted for Vlad's choice.

Why did the DNC lie about their primaries being ACTUAL elections?

That's my beef. Don't lie.....just say Hillary is the decided nominee.....PERIOD.
kinda would defeat the purpose of the primaries overall, wouldn't it?

What do you perceive the purpose of primaries to be?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
to see which candidate best represents my views and who i want to run for president.

Then the purpose of the primary is not defeated. You are free to do that in the primary, just do not expect the party to agree with your choice


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
which is exactly what happened in the GOP. thanks,
 
Yep, you're full blown Canada now. Good luck folks.

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The parties can run their primaries however they see fit.

So don't have a primary then. Don't have debates, don't pretend you care about your candidate. Put how ever many hats you need for candidates, lay them on the floor and asked them to be filled with donations. Whoever gets the most wins.

Invite Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, China, North Korea or any other nation to donate as well. Fill that hat up and pick the person who gets the most.

You just KNOW this is great for American interests...blue ribbon winners all their lives who would prefer to anoint rather than compete fairly. As I said in the OP, full blown Canadians.

You miss the point. Sanders wasn’t “their” candidate. He’s not a Democrat, nor has he ever been one. Sanders is an independent who tried to co-opt the resources and organization of the Democratic Party and their campaign funds to launch an independent run for the Presidency.

It’s hardly surprising that they didn’t want him there.
it's exactly what Trump did with the GOP.
 

Forum List

Back
Top