Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #181
So Silo......you can't site any child benefiting from denying same sex marriage..
You're talking about a static temporal standard. I'm arguing from the Supreme Court's impact over time. I'm thinking that faced with these two temporal dichotomies 1. a few thousand kids caught up in gay adult lifestyles today vs 2. 100s of millions of kids institutionally deprived of either a mother or father over time, the Court will choose to focus on the longterm impacts of the decision of just 9 of them in DC today, this year.
They will return the question to the states where it has always been; certainly it would be reaffirming Windsor.