Lead Prosecutor in Rittenhouse Political Prosecution Says Rittenhouse Chased His Antifa Attackers. Then He Shows Video Of Antifa Chasing Rittenhouse.

[Rust_Cohle]

And yet, you are the only one to have noticed. It never came up at trial and was never the subject of ME testimony. Have you informed the district attorney?

Binger and the Fat Man have him scheduled next as a surprise expert witless

 

[Faun]

“We’re not saying he was turned and shot in the back correct?” asked Richards. “That’s correct,” said Kelley.

Richards asked Kelley whether the “position of lunging would put you in a horizontal position,” and Kelley said, “Correct.”

The second to the fourth shot occurred in less than a second.

He said the head wound “would be” consistent with the defense attorney, in Richards’ words, “turning like a bull and diving.”

Happy now dumbass. Your argument is vaporized like Gayge's Bicep

LOL

“We’re not saying he was turned and shot in the back correct?” asked Richards. “That’s correct,” said Kelley.

LOL

You're cracking me up. That's right, Rosenbaum wasn't turned and shot in the back. He was face down and shot in the back. He never turned.

You're not very bright as YOU keep posting evidence supporting my claim.

Furthermore, and I note, you failed miserably to show the medical examiner ever said he was shot in the chest.

You're too sophomoric, ChoadBreath.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

“We’re not saying he was turned and shot in the back correct?” asked Richards. “That’s correct,” said Kelley.

LOL

You're cracking me up. That's right, Rosenbaum wasn't turned and shot in the back. He was face down and shot in the back. He never turned.

You're not very bright as YOU keep posting evidence supporting my claim.

Furthermore, and I note, you failed miserably to show the medical examiner ever said he was shot in the chest.

You're too sophomoric, ChoadBreath.

Now you can't read

He wasn't turned and shot in the back.meaning the bullet entered his chest and exited the back

Which means I was right and you're too small a man to admit you're wrong

So I'll take this as your concession

Ice up son

 

[OKTexas]

I agree on the intentional homicide charge...however...on the lesser charges..Kyle might be in trouble--even though, again, i think that a hung jury is by far the most likely scenario.
Just too many people who will vote their politics and their culture..and not the facts.

The first guy threatened the lives of the group guarding the car lot, and grabbed the barrel of the rifle according to the coroner, trying to disarm Rittenhouse before he was shot. The second guy tried to kill Rittenhouse with a skateboard before he was shot. The third guy admitted, under oath, he wasn't shot till he aimed his handgun at Rittenhouse. All three were clear cases of self defense. Total acquittal is the only just verdict.

.

 

[Faun]

Wrong

LOL

Utters the putz who's arguing Rosenbaum could have been shot in the chest despite having no chest wounds and despite the medical examiner saying he was shot in the back and despite the medical examiner never saying he was shot in the chest.

And nope, not wrong. Wisconsin law only allows sufficient force to stop a threat. It doesn't allow for more force than is needed to stop a threat. Shooting someone in the back is excessive force.

 

[OKTexas]

Hung is my bet. Try him again with a different judge who doesn’t say up front that these weren’t victims but rather rioters & looters. And one who allows more than one black juror.

The judge doesn't pick the jury dumb ass.

.

 

[Mac-7]

The prosecution crashed and burned. They didn’t prove anything, much less “beyond reasonable doubt”.

There is nothing to prove

It clearly was self defense

 

[Rust_Cohle]

LOL

Utters the putz who's arguing Rosenbaum could have been shot in the chest despite having no chest wounds and despite the medical examiner saying he was shot in the back and despite the medical examiner never saying he was shot in the chest.

And nope, not wrong. Wisconsin law only allows sufficient force to stop a threat. It doesn't allow for more force than is needed to stop a threat. Shooting someone in the back is excessive force.

Still can't read but your cognitive dissonance is off the charts

Ice. Up.

I'd say Kyle stopped the threats. 3 times that night

 

[OKTexas]

No muzzle flash visible in that photo. You're just not very smart, are ya?

.

 

[Faun]

Now you can't read

He wasn't turned and shot in the back.meaning the bullet entered his chest and exited the back

Which means I was right and you're too small a man to admit you're wrong

So I'll take this as your concession

Ice up son

LOLOL

G'head... show the class where you see a bullet wound in his chest....

Take your time, ChoadBreath.

 

[OKTexas]

The little Nazi went looking for someone to shoot with his illegally acquired weapon and people died as a result.

He's guilty as fuck, but I agree it will be a hung jury. All it will take is one damn tRumpling idiot.

Turn of the MSLSD.

.

 

[Faun]

The first guy threatened the lives of the group guarding the car lot, and grabbed the barrel of the rifle according to the coroner, trying to disarm Rittenhouse before he was shot. The second guy tried to kill Rittenhouse with a skateboard before he was shot. The third guy admitted, under oath, he wasn't shot till he aimed his handgun at Rittenhouse. All three were clear cases of self defense. Total acquittal is the only just verdict.

.

False. He testified Rosenbaum was no more than 4 feet away when the first shot was fires. It was after that when Rosenbaum either tried to grab the barrel or swipe at it.

 

[Faun]

Still can't read but your cognitive dissonance is off the charts

Ice. Up.

I'd say Kyle stopped the threats. 3 times that night

LOLOL

I read you your own article back to you and you still can't comprehend it.

“We’re not saying he was turned and shot in the back correct?” asked Richards. “That’s correct,” said Kelley.​

That is correct in that Rosenbaum didn't turn and get shot in the back. Rosenbaum fell face down and was shot in the back. He never turned. That's even evident on the video you posted.

 

[OKTexas]

These are known facts in the case. The person who supplied him with a gun he was too young to buy has been charged with straw purchasing it. He left his home state to go to Kenosha with an illegal gun which he illegally trafficked across the state line. There's a whole series of illegal acts that lead up to this. It didn't happen in a vacuum.

Edit:. This trial.is a joke anyway. The judge has decreed the shooting victims cannot be referred to as victims, among other irregularities that confirm his bias. Even if it results in a verdict there is already ample excuse to retry it.

If there is a not guilty verdict, it can't be retried.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Based on what I’ve seen so far the judge should just dismiss the case. Why waste more time?

The defense should request and be granted a directed verdict of not guilty, because the State failed to meet their burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

.

 

[Jarlaxle]

The prosecution crashed and burned. They didn’t prove anything, much less “beyond reasonable doubt”.

The only question is whether or not there are woke BLM idiots on the jury who are disconnected from reality.

Or if jurors are worried about getting doxxed...

 

[Jarlaxle]

The little Nazi went looking for someone to shoot with his illegally acquired weapon and people died as a result.

He's guilty as fuck, but I agree it will be a hung jury. All it will take is one damn tRumpling idiot.

Every word of this is a lie.

 

[OKTexas]

False. He testified Rosenbaum was no more than 4 feet away when the first shot was fires. It was after that when Rosenbaum either tried to grab the barrel or swipe at it.

The point is he went for the rifle and was put 6 feet under where he belongs.

.

 

[westwall]

That's not spraying bullets moron. Rittenhouse fired 8 rounds. Four into your buddy, the pedo, one into your pal the domestic abuser, and one into yiur communist friend. He missed with two.

Get your facts straight.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Prove he illegally acquired it and prove he went on the attack. Show video evidence

SPOILER : You can't

Well, that he illegally acquired it is a no-brainer..as he was 17 and had a straw buyer buy the gun for him. He's admitted as much, and the guy who bought the weapon for him is awaiting his own day in court.