Leave it to Texas republicans to ban books. Free speech is circumstantial, apparently.

[justoffal]

It absolutely matters developmentally and psychologically. Preteen children have no understanding of sexual identity. That understanding does not begin to start until adolescence and does not fully form until adulthood. What you are advocating is extremely damaging to young children. It is sick.

Precisely why the left wants to get them before they develop.If they can get into their heads early on they have a better chance of turning them.

 

[Billy000]

You truly are sick. I hope you have zero access to children.

Lol why do you assume I personally have a desire to give them books with gay characters in it? Nothing I said should make you believe that.

 

[TeeDub]

Your opinion is entirely emotional. There’s no logic to what you’re saying. You think it’s correct simply because it sounds like it is correct.

Sorry fool that is what I was taught in psychology. You are clueless, most of this crap you spew was taught in ABNORMAL psychology classes.

 

[Billy000]

Sorry fool that is what I was taught in psychology. You are clueless, most of this crap you spew was taught in ABNORMAL psychology classes.

My bachelors is in psychology so I know that’s bullshit. Homosexuality hasn’t been in the DSM for decades therefore it isn’t abnormal. Of course you putting “abnormal” in all caps tells me you don’t quite understand the context of the word in this case.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.

Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?

Conservatives are removing 'pornographic' books from schools. Many feature LGBTQ+ characters.

Conservative politicians and activists have successfully removed more than 1,000 unique book titles from schools, often arguing they're too obscene.

www.yahoo.com

Such is the neo-fascist, authoritarian right.

 

[Staidhup]

First it was how wonderful the world would be under socialist and communism rule, now it’s how wonderful life is being sexually confused. Is there no end to this nonsense? Social engineering is not what tax payers pay for!

 

[22lcidw]

Umm okay. Again think about this rationally. A kid picks up a book with gay characters in it. There’s no sex or nudity in it. That would do….what to the kid?

Does this mean that the gay parades will stop? For they seem to be a lot more than just clothed people walking down the street.

 

[Westender]

Umm okay. Again think about this rationally. A kid picks up a book with gay characters in it. There’s no sex or nudity in it. That would do….what to the kid?

You don't need to be talking about sex to kids. Gay, promiscuous, celibate, sterile, horny, incestuous, etc. Don't talk to kids about your sex life

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Lol yep fuck Texas. I’m perfectly fine never going there again.

If you need any extra incentive to stay out let me know. I'll lock and load.

 

[Stashman]

So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.

Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?

Conservatives are removing 'pornographic' books from schools. Many feature LGBTQ+ characters.

Conservative politicians and activists have successfully removed more than 1,000 unique book titles from schools, often arguing they're too obscene.

www.yahoo.com

Why would the book even point out that anyone is gay? How many books do you know about that goes out of it's way to point out someone is heterosexual? Why provide anything to a child that says someone is gay. Once again it's about the lefts agenda to groom children.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I imagine you’re okay with a married straight couple in a kid’s book. That’s technically a sexual relationship. The logic easily goes both ways.

Having two dads or two mothers is not normal.
The fact that you're okay with saying it is makes you abnormal.

 

[bodecea]

Having two dads or two mothers is not normal.
The fact that you're okay with saying it is makes you abnormal.

It's not average......just like being left-handed isn't normal. There was a time when people were punished and shunned for that too based on superstition and ignorance.

 

[bodecea]

Yet here you are defending the teaching of sexual subjects to small children.

It's clear where you're head is

Your link to what sexual subjects are being taught to what age children is missing.

 

[bodecea]

None of this shit belongs in books for minor children in a school library....GROOMER

So...nothing about married couples or having children in any school library book.....................good luck with that.....GROOMED.

 

[bodecea]

Whoever handed out that material should be arrested and charged with something.

"charged with something"...................such as?

 

[Billy000]

If you need any extra incentive to stay out let me know. I'll lock and load.

Ooo big tough guy over here! Look over here everyone. Farnsworth wants you to know how tough he is!

 

[bodecea]

Doesn't matter if a parent likes or dislikes queers. The parent determines what their child is exposed to. Can't you get that through your deranged skull?

Then homeschool them. Problem solved.

 

[bodecea]

4% vs. 96%. It is not normal by any stretch of the imagination.

Like being left-handed.....or Jewish....or blue-eyed...or having red hair.

 

[BS Filter]

BELONG? Slaves?

Children belong to their parents. Deranged cockroach.

 

[BS Filter]

Then homeschool them. Problem solved.

Nope. We pay for the schools. Go to hell, queer.