Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower taking over after the French were defeated...Where are righties ever for free speech???
When they opposed the so called "campaign finance reform" which regulated free speech going into elections, when they opposed the so called "fairness" doctrine which requires private companies to give free airtime to leftist groups, when they allow Hillary to speak without attacking her supporters ...
Watch what happens when they dare to protest a war initiated by a Republican President and his friends in Congress.
That already happened, and nothing happened
Wow, that's a terrible understanding of history. Embarassing really.
Eisenhower made the treaties but never sent troops, to call that "starting" the war is stupid.
Kennedy sent advisers and trainers but not significant combat troops.
Johnson started the deployment of significant combat troops.
You're another sad product of government schools
They are just like the era of enlightened right winged ecclesiastical despotic monarchs...Leftist are Communists how never like Freedom to all people.
He damn sure set the US up for a future war....what he did was post WWII policy of balance of power from pre WWII era...public schools, wow, I went to a private Baptist school...They must suck also...The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower taking over after the French were defeated...When they opposed the so called "campaign finance reform" which regulated free speech going into elections, when they opposed the so called "fairness" doctrine which requires private companies to give free airtime to leftist groups, when they allow Hillary to speak without attacking her supporters ...
Watch what happens when they dare to protest a war initiated by a Republican President and his friends in Congress.
That already happened, and nothing happened
Wow, that's a terrible understanding of history. Embarassing really.
Eisenhower made the treaties but never sent troops, to call that "starting" the war is stupid.
Kennedy sent advisers and trainers but not significant combat troops.
Johnson started the deployment of significant combat troops.
You're another sad product of government schools
The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower taking over after the French were defeated...When they opposed the so called "campaign finance reform" which regulated free speech going into elections, when they opposed the so called "fairness" doctrine which requires private companies to give free airtime to leftist groups, when they allow Hillary to speak without attacking her supporters ...
Watch what happens when they dare to protest a war initiated by a Republican President and his friends in Congress.
That already happened, and nothing happened
Wow, that's a terrible understanding of history. Embarassing really.
Eisenhower made the treaties but never sent troops, to call that "starting" the war is stupid.
Kennedy sent advisers and trainers but not significant combat troops.
Johnson started the deployment of significant combat troops.
You're another sad product of government schools
Q. Why and under what authority did LBJ send troops to Vietnam
A. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
We didn't start the war, just like in Korea, we were just there...The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower taking over after the French were defeated...Watch what happens when they dare to protest a war initiated by a Republican President and his friends in Congress.
That already happened, and nothing happened
Wow, that's a terrible understanding of history. Embarassing really.
Eisenhower made the treaties but never sent troops, to call that "starting" the war is stupid.
Kennedy sent advisers and trainers but not significant combat troops.
Johnson started the deployment of significant combat troops.
You're another sad product of government schools
Q. Why and under what authority did LBJ send troops to Vietnam
A. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
I've never heard of anyone but you idiots claiming that signing a treaty was starting a war. You people are seriously fucked in the head you're so lost in Democrat partisanship
No, this is proof of the ignorance and stupidity common to most on the right.The liberals here wanted proof of the hatred of free speech in the left. While too many obvious cases to count exist, this one takes it to almost conspiratorial level.
"The European Union (EU), in partnership with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft, has unveiled a "code of conduct" to combat the spread of "illegal hate speech" online in Europe."
"The EU did very little to define what they mean by “hate speech” in the ‘Code of Conduct’, simply calling it speech that could “incite hatred” towards various minority groups. There is, therefore, a fear they will use this stretchable definition to silence criticism of their own policies – such open borders and mass migration."
"Meanwhile, the BBC, the UK taxpayer funded national broadcaster, attacked those criticizing the new ‘Code of Conduct’ as “standing up for hate”."
VIDEO: EU And Facebook Pledge To ‘Reeducate’ Users And Crush Free Speech
European Union Declares War On Internet Free Speech | Zero Hedge
This will be America's future too, under the Clintons. Under the ideology of tolerance, free speech won't be tolerated.
And another rightwing moron chimes in to exhibit her ignorance and stupidity.Leftist Hate Free Speech = Political Censorship
Just sayin'.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Breitbart"Where are righties ever for free speech???
Ah, the false equivalency parade. If you think they are comparable to the modern day leftist lynch mob, you might as well have the perrfect vacuum in the place of your brain.
"A new poll shows that a majority of Democrats want to limit free speech with laws that would prohibit so-called “hate speech.”
The YouGov poll published Wednesday found that 51 percent of Democrats favor imposing legal limits on free speech while just 26 percent of Democrats oppose the idea.
Majority of Democrats Support Criminalizing Free Speech - Breitbart
We didn't start the war
The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower
i am sure you will set your clock to it...We didn't start the war
The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower
This is what it's like posting with someone who writes the crap you do, just so you know
No, this is proof of the ignorance and stupidity common to most on the right.The liberals here wanted proof of the hatred of free speech in the left. While too many obvious cases to count exist, this one takes it to almost conspiratorial level.
"The European Union (EU), in partnership with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft, has unveiled a "code of conduct" to combat the spread of "illegal hate speech" online in Europe."
"The EU did very little to define what they mean by “hate speech” in the ‘Code of Conduct’, simply calling it speech that could “incite hatred” towards various minority groups. There is, therefore, a fear they will use this stretchable definition to silence criticism of their own policies – such open borders and mass migration."
"Meanwhile, the BBC, the UK taxpayer funded national broadcaster, attacked those criticizing the new ‘Code of Conduct’ as “standing up for hate”."
VIDEO: EU And Facebook Pledge To ‘Reeducate’ Users And Crush Free Speech
European Union Declares War On Internet Free Speech | Zero Hedge
This will be America's future too, under the Clintons. Under the ideology of tolerance, free speech won't be tolerated.
The fails as a slippery slope fallacy, in addition to being a lie.
The doctrine of free speech applies to the relationship between government and those governed, not between or among private persons and organizations – Facebook can’t ‘violate’ anyone’s free speech.
And the United States is not the EU, which fails as a false comparison fallacy; American First Amendment jurisprudence would prohibit the sort of regulations that are allowed in Europe.
Last, no one in the linked article was identified as ‘liberal,’ nor were ‘liberals’ identified as being ‘opposed to free speech.’
We didn't start the war
Debate the flag burner? We can debate whether he wants to go to the hospital or a morgue.So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?
The right .
A lesser act than that of Putin, he simply kills those who get in his way. But those who choose violence over debate are no different than Putin.
You bastards ain't Americans. You clowns HATE what America was originally intended for which is why you LOVE and root for Obama "fundamentally transforming America"You wackos crack me up. You fall all over yourselves to spread dissent and hatred towards your fellow Americans and don't even look at the stats you're referencing. Did you even notice that the total for all Americans is just about even? Did you consider people laughing at you for using a hard core partisan site to try to support your predefined ideology?Where are righties ever for free speech???
Ah, the false equivalency parade. If you think they are comparable to the modern day leftist lynch mob, you might as well have the perrfect vacuum in the place of your brain.
"A new poll shows that a majority of Democrats want to limit free speech with laws that would prohibit so-called “hate speech.”
The YouGov poll published Wednesday found that 51 percent of Democrats favor imposing legal limits on free speech while just 26 percent of Democrats oppose the idea.
Majority of Democrats Support Criminalizing Free Speech - Breitbart
Think! Use the brain God gave you to think!
Calling a physical act 'free speech' or 'free expression' is the most ridiculous decision our pansy SCROTUS has done in years along with the Faggot Marriage Act.So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?
The right .
How pro free speech of you!
How'm I doin with my free speech rights, Homer?
I'm not a Christian but the Flag is wrapped me. And I don't care if he burns the flag or wipes his ass with it. What he gets punished for is provoking me. He gets what he wanted.Debate the flag burner? We can debate whether he wants to go to the hospital or a morgue.So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?
The right .
A lesser act than that of Putin, he simply kills those who get in his way. But those who choose violence over debate are no different than Putin.
So you approve of the 1st A only as it protects your right, not the right of others. See my signature line below as it fits you to the "T".
Aw, yer just pissed because you can't agree with the truth because of LIberalism.Calling a physical act 'free speech' or 'free expression' is the most ridiculous decision our pansy SCROTUS has done in years along with the Faggot Marriage Act.So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?
The right .
How pro free speech of you!
How'm I doin with my free speech rights, Homer?
You're batting a thousand! Not once have you proved you have the right stuff to call yourself an American. Putin would be proud to welcome you to live in Moscow as a comrade.