Leftists HATE free-speech

[bripat9643]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

 

[Hossfly]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Californicate is due for the Big One that will dump them into the ocean so let them have fun with their gubmint rules while they are able.

 

[Timmy]

Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?

The right .

So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.

How pro free speech of you!

 

[Timmy]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

 

[Hossfly]

Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?

The right .

So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.

How pro free speech of you!

Calling a physical act 'free speech' or 'free expression' is the most ridiculous decision our pansy SCROTUS has done in years along with the Faggot Marriage Act.
How'm I doin with my free speech rights, Homer?

 

[Iceweasel]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

So the dims are going to waste taxpayer money to shut down speech they disagree with. How evil. The science isn't settled unless you disregard every skeptic out there.

 

[bripat9643]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

There's no such thing as "settled science," douche bag. The AGW cult members are the ones running the disinformation campaign.

You just admitted that you're an imbecile drone who opposes free speech. Idiots like you always have their excuses.

The judgement against the tobacco companies was also an assault on free speech.

 

[bripat9643]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

So the dims are going to waste taxpayer money to shut down speech they disagree with. How evil. The science isn't settled unless you disregard every skeptic out there.

Luckily this bill is going nowhere, but at some point in the future idiots like Timmy might get their way.

 

[Timmy]

Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?

The right .

So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.

How pro free speech of you!

Calling a physical act 'free speech' or 'free expression' is the most ridiculous decision our pansy SCROTUS has done in years along with the Faggot Marriage Act.
How'm I doin with my free speech rights, Homer?

Yes a physical act can be speech .

Are you going to take a baseball bat to Boy Scouts who are burning flags ? Why not ? It's the same physical act as the protestor burning a flag .

 

[Moonglow]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

yet the bill is already dead by freedom loving liberals...

 

[Timmy]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

There's no such thing as "settled science," douche bag. The AGW cult members are the ones running the disinformation campaign.

You just admitted that you're an imbecile drone who opposes free speech. Idiots like you always have their excuses.

The judgement against the tobacco companies was also an assault on free speech.

Who said I was for the Bill? I just wanted to out it in true context unlike your bullshit description .

So what do you think of flag burning laws ??

 

[Iceweasel]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

So the dims are going to waste taxpayer money to shut down speech they disagree with. How evil. The science isn't settled unless you disregard every skeptic out there.

Luckily this bill is going nowhere, but at some point in the future idiots like Timmy might get their way.

I hope you are wrong but if America keeps voting stupidly it could happen. Questioning man made global warming or trannies in the rest room might get you locked up.

 

[Timmy]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

So the dims are going to waste taxpayer money to shut down speech they disagree with. How evil. The science isn't settled unless you disregard every skeptic out there.

Luckily this bill is going nowhere, but at some point in the future idiots like Timmy might get their way.

I hope you are wrong but if America keeps voting stupidly it could happen. Questioning man made global warming or trannies in the rest room might get you locked up.

Wow, u righties need extra thick tin foil hats!

 

[Iceweasel]

Wow, u righties need extra thick tin foil hats!

No, we need fewer thick liberals.

 

[bripat9643]

If you want the ultimate proof that leftwing douche bags hate free speech, consider this:

California Bill Would Make Climate Change Skepticism CRIMINAL | RedState

A bill is working its way through the California assembly that would allow local prosecutors to bring criminal charges under the State’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) for expressing skepticism or denial of man made climate change. Seriously.

Now this is not one of those situations where some random crazy assemblyman proposes a bill that goes nowhere. Nor is this an offhand comment by Loretta Lynch. This bill has made it through committee and is scheduled for floor action on Thursday. This is a bill that has a real chance of becoming law.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.​

Here's the reason for that bill:

The given reason for the bill in the first place was allegations that oil companies such as Exxon Mobil have been running “disinformation” campaigns against the “settled science” of human-caused global warming. A number of Democratic state attorneys general are attempting to file suit against oil companies and conservative think tanks on the same basis that tobacco companies were for disinforming the public about the harmful effects of cigarette smoking.

There's no such thing as "settled science," douche bag. The AGW cult members are the ones running the disinformation campaign.

You just admitted that you're an imbecile drone who opposes free speech. Idiots like you always have their excuses.

The judgement against the tobacco companies was also an assault on free speech.

Who said I was for the Bill? I just wanted to out it in true context unlike your bullshit description .

So what do you think of flag burning laws ??

You made excuses for it, douche bag.

I'm opposed to all flag burning laws. Idiots should be free to self identify.

 

[Hossfly]

Who's always out trying to pass flag burning laws ?

The right .

So? I see a bastid burning a flag and a Louisville Slugger to the back of his head will launch his dentures about 50 feet. The record is 63' 10''. Vigilante holds the record.

How pro free speech of you!

Calling a physical act 'free speech' or 'free expression' is the most ridiculous decision our pansy SCROTUS has done in years along with the Faggot Marriage Act.
How'm I doin with my free speech rights, Homer?

Yes a physical act can be speech .

Are you going to take a baseball bat to Boy Scouts who are burning flags ? Why not ? It's the same physical act as the protestor burning a flag .

No way, Jose. We let the Scouts burn old and damage flags most every Saturday at my VFW post. It's a ceremony.
So if I whip out my willie and piss all over you that is considered free speech?

 

[Vigilante]

Honestly it has never been so bad as it has since the little commie prick took over the White House.....this sums it up...

 

[Norman]

 

[kaz]

Where are righties ever for free speech???

When they opposed the so called "campaign finance reform" which regulated free speech going into elections, when they opposed the so called "fairness" doctrine which requires private companies to give free airtime to leftist groups, when they allow Hillary to speak without attacking her supporters ...

Watch what happens when they dare to protest a war initiated by a Republican President and his friends in Congress.

That already happened, and nothing happened

The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower taking over after the French were defeated...

Wow, that's a terrible understanding of history. Embarassing really.

Eisenhower made the treaties but never sent troops, to call that "starting" the war is stupid.

Kennedy sent advisers and trainers but not significant combat troops.

Johnson started the deployment of significant combat troops.

You're another sad product of government schools

 

[Moonglow]

Where are righties ever for free speech???

When they opposed the so called "campaign finance reform" which regulated free speech going into elections, when they opposed the so called "fairness" doctrine which requires private companies to give free airtime to leftist groups, when they allow Hillary to speak without attacking her supporters ...

Watch what happens when they dare to protest a war initiated by a Republican President and his friends in Congress.

That already happened, and nothing happened

The Vietnam war ended and it was stared by Eisenhower taking over after the French were defeated...

Wow, that's a terrible understanding of history. Embarassing really.

Eisenhower made the treaties but never sent troops, to call that "starting" the war is stupid.

Kennedy sent advisers and trainers but not significant combat troops.

Johnson started the deployment of significant combat troops.

You're another sad product of government schools

He damn sure set the US up for a future war....what he did was post WWII policy of balance of power from pre WWII era...public schools, wow, I went to a private Baptist school...They must suck also...