🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,149
'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...


 
'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...


Bragg hitched his post to the demafasict agenda and it’s going to back fire bigly for his future career
 
'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...



This is the sad part…….he may actually believe this is a legal action….,

This is nothing but a political lynching…they don’t care about the law and it will likely go to trial with this judge and a hand picked jury…….this is about martyring Trump and threatening all other Republican politicians……
 
Harvard

VER IT AS

LOL!!!!


Mr. Bragg is supposed to keep NYC safe. Instead, he has bent every possible legal theory to make himself popular with the homO army of sick America haters...


Harvard Law Degree = no merit, no truth, no legal ability, just 100% pure partisan bullshit and fuck the people of NY who want to be safe...
 
Soros-supported DA Alvin Bragg campaigned on tbe promise he would 'Get Trump' before he had officially ever looked into / investigated Trump.

Bragg openly declared through his promise to 'Get Trump' that 'Trump is Guilty' ... he just had not come up with a crime yet.

Today's indictment / charges by Bragg was an ATTEMPT TO KEEP A CAMPAIGN PROMISE.

'Show me the man, & I will show you tbe crime.'

Pelosi declared Trump should be put on trial SO HE CAN PROVE HIS INNOCENSE.

That's NOT how the US Justice System, based on tbe US Constitution - works...

...but thst is how Democrats run things in the corrupt socialist authoritarian 2-tiered 3rd World Banana Republic.
 
Last edited:
'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...


Trump should sue Bragg for personal damages and abuse of the system.
 
There are 2 crimes already Bragg should be charged with - withholding exculpatory evidrnce and leaking sealed Grand Jury information.

As with every other Democrat who has committed crimes during their failed attempts to 'Get Trump' the last 7 years, Bragg will be held to a different tier in the Democrats' Justice system and will be protected.
 
Chairman Xi is smiling with glee as his puppets in the demafasict clan destroy our republic
 
'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...


I am sorry, but your source does not support the claim, "across the political spectrum". Every single lawyer quoted has a well known conservative background. And Jennifer Van Laar is the managing editor of Redstate, does not have a law degree, and only legal experience is 20 years as a court reporter, LOL. But a couple of points from your article,

There are 34 charges of “Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree” that say “defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry.” Then, the difference is entries in invoices, a ledger, or checks between February and December 2017. So it doesn’t even outline if there are different transactions, it could all be one incident alleged to be covered up if you read this.
No, it can't be just one incident, and yes, it specifically outlines each transaction with a ledger number, an invoice, or a check number. Is the Trump organization in the habit of creating mulitple ledger transactions for one transaction? You can see both the indictment and the Statement of Facts here,


That is pretty funny. Red State actually posts the Scribd posting of both knowing full well you yahoos ain't going to bother to read it. But here is the part that even a damn former court reporter should know better.

. It doesn’t specifically note in the indictment what the underlying crime is that’s supposed to justify this. But if it’s an alleged federal election issue discussed in the statement of facts, that’s a big problem since that would have to be pursued in a federal court.

I mean that is helluva stupid. No, federal charges do not have to have been filed, nor do they have to be filed. Hell, that is why they falsified business records, to COVER UP THE DAMN CRIME. So no damn wonder no federal charges have been filed. Now, if Trump is convicted on any of these charges the federal courts made take another look at it, but rather they do is not germane to this case and Trump's lawyers should have enough sense not to make that stupid ass argument. Although I don't know, they have shown themselves to pretty damn inept over the last couple of years.
 

Forum List

Back
Top