Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

[Winston]

Alvin Bragg Faces the Inconvenient Truth as People Notice NO ACTUAL LAW Is Cited in Trump Indictments - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Imagine trying to play a baseball game without having a baseball. That’s the hand that Soros-backed Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has dealt himself in his quest to fulfill his Orange Man Bad commitment to take down President...

thelibertydaily.com

Robert Barnes is not quoting the indictment, he is quoting the Statements of Fact. You people are so damn gullible, it is kind of sad really.

 

[Winston]

There are 2 crimes already Bragg should be charged with - withholding exculpatory evidrnce and leaking sealed Grand Jury information.

As with every other Democrat who has committed crimes during their failed attempts to 'Get Trump' the last 7 years, Bragg will be held to a different tier in the Democrats' Justice system and will be protected.

You stupid shit, he can't be charged with withholding exculpatory evidence when the Discovery phase of the trail is just starting. Where do you morons come up with this shit?

 

[easyt65]

You stupid shit, he can't be charged with withholding exculpatory evidence when the Discovery phase of the trail is just starting. Where do you morons come up with this shit?

They're called Lawyers / Legal Experts.

For the Grand Jury to decide if criminal counts should be filed, to decide if the DA has a case or not and indictments should be issued / fed, the evidrnce - ALL the evidence - must be presented to the Grand Jury.

IOT get the Frand Jury to co.e up with 3r cou ts against Trump DA Bragg WUTHHELD EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE from the Grand Jury.

How can you hope yo come off as knowing what you are talking about if you don't rven know THIS much?

You would know this if you opened / read provided links and/ or did some research.

 

[Winston]

They're called Lawyers / Legal Experts.

For the Grand Jury to decide if criminal counts should be filed, to decide if the DA has a case or not and indictments should be issued / fed, the evidrnce - ALL the evidence - must be presented to the Grand Jury.

IOT get the Frand Jury to co.e up with 3r cou ts against Trump DA Bragg WUTHHELD EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE from the Grand Jury.

How can you hope yo come off as knowing what you are talking about if you don't rven know THIS much?

You would know this if you opened / read provided links and/ or did some research.

What "clearly exculpatory" evidence did Bragg not submit?

 

[mudwhistle]

Heh-heh Trump's in trouble yet again, heh-heh. He's not very good at hiding his crimes.

Guilty of messy paperwork.
34 counts of messy paperwork.

 

[skye]

They are democrats after all.

They certainly are .....and of course they are laughing!

 

[Billiejeens]

well he may end up the black version of Mike Nifong.

Omg.

 

[Billiejeens]

There are 2 crimes already Bragg should be charged with - withholding exculpatory evidrnce and leaking sealed Grand Jury information.

As with every other Democrat who has committed crimes during their failed attempts to 'Get Trump' the last 7 years, Bragg will be held to a different tier in the Democrats' Justice system and will be protected.

Justice will only come by going around the system.

 

[excalibur]

This is who and what we are dealing with. Soon, they'll be renaming months and changing the number of weeks in a month. Shades of 1789.

 

[struth]

Robert Barnes is not quoting the indictment, he is quoting the Statements of Fact. You people are so damn gullible, it is kind of sad really.

um that’s part of rhe indictment..

 

[scruffy]

well he may end up the black version of Mike Nifong.

Bragg is going to fail, then the leftards are going to pile on him, blaming him for their total failure.

Bragg is being set up.

 

[DudleySmith]

'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...

Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

redstate.com

After seeing his pic a couple hours ago Trump's lawyers should have demanded that Bragg and his pet judge take drug tests.

 

[j-mac]

I am sorry, but your source does not support the claim, "across the political spectrum". Every single lawyer quoted has a well known conservative background. And Jennifer Van Laar is the managing editor of Redstate, does not have a law degree, and only legal experience is 20 years as a court reporter, LOL. But a couple of points from your article,

There are 34 charges of “Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree” that say “defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry.” Then, the difference is entries in invoices, a ledger, or checks between February and December 2017. So it doesn’t even outline if there are different transactions, it could all be one incident alleged to be covered up if you read this.
No, it can't be just one incident, and yes, it specifically outlines each transaction with a ledger number, an invoice, or a check number. Is the Trump organization in the habit of creating mulitple ledger transactions for one transaction? You can see both the indictment and the Statement of Facts here,

BREAKING: Donald Trump Arraigned, Enters Not Guilty Plea to 34 Charges

redstate.com

That is pretty funny. Red State actually posts the Scribd posting of both knowing full well you yahoos ain't going to bother to read it. But here is the part that even a damn former court reporter should know better.

. It doesn’t specifically note in the indictment what the underlying crime is that’s supposed to justify this. But if it’s an alleged federal election issue discussed in the statement of facts, that’s a big problem since that would have to be pursued in a federal court.

I mean that is helluva stupid. No, federal charges do not have to have been filed, nor do they have to be filed. Hell, that is why they falsified business records, to COVER UP THE DAMN CRIME. So no damn wonder no federal charges have been filed. Now, if Trump is convicted on any of these charges the federal courts made take another look at it, but rather they do is not germane to this case and Trump's lawyers should have enough sense not to make that stupid ass argument. Although I don't know, they have shown themselves to pretty damn inept over the last couple of years.

What’s the “other crime” he was covering up?

 

[struth]

Bragg is going to fail, then the leftards are going to pile on him, blaming him for their total failure.

Bragg is being set up.

Bragg might end up like the last demafasict lawyer hero they sent after trump and got in bed with cohen and stormy….mike avanitti

 

[struth]

What’s the “other crime” he was covering up?

one dembot poster said it was defrauding then american people by hiding this negative information during the campaign

which is scary for all future people running for any office

 

[j-mac]

one dembot poster said it was defrauding then american people by hiding this negative information during the campaign

which is scary for all future people running for any office

They are destroying the justice system, and the courts to win an election….

 

[scruffy]

one dembot poster said it was defrauding then american people by hiding this negative information during the campaign

which is scary for all future people running for any office

Of course it is.

The next Democratic candidate is going to get FUCKED. With a red hot poker.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...

Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

redstate.com

Everyone with an ounce of common sense is laughing at Bragga the Hut.

 

[SeaMajor7]

This is who and what we are dealing with. Soon, they'll be renaming months and changing the number of weeks in a month. Shades of 1789.

AI will always be bound by the one basic rule of computing....
GIGO FOREVER!!!!!