Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You stupid shit, he can't be charged with withholding exculpatory evidence when the Discovery phase of the trail is just starting. Where do you morons come up with this shit?

We will enjoy laughing at all you leftists legal experts throughout this entire smear campaign. Just like we did with the Mara A Lago document case.

 

[Billiejeens]

Former National Security Adviser John Bolton, a long-time critic of former President Donald Trump, predicted Tuesday the “thin” case of falsifying business records would be dismissed.

“I’m extraordinarily distressed by this document,” Bolton told CNN host Anderson Cooper and other panelists. “I think this is even weaker than I feared. It would be, uh and I think it’s easily subject to being dismissed or a quick acquittal for Trump.”

 

[Billiejeens]

I am sorry, but your source does not support the claim, "across the political spectrum". Every single lawyer quoted has a well known conservative background. And Jennifer Van Laar is the managing editor of Redstate, does not have a law degree, and only legal experience is 20 years as a court reporter, LOL. But a couple of points from your article,

There are 34 charges of “Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree” that say “defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry.” Then, the difference is entries in invoices, a ledger, or checks between February and December 2017. So it doesn’t even outline if there are different transactions, it could all be one incident alleged to be covered up if you read this.
No, it can't be just one incident, and yes, it specifically outlines each transaction with a ledger number, an invoice, or a check number. Is the Trump organization in the habit of creating mulitple ledger transactions for one transaction? You can see both the indictment and the Statement of Facts here,

BREAKING: Donald Trump Arraigned, Enters Not Guilty Plea to 34 Charges

redstate.com

That is pretty funny. Red State actually posts the Scribd posting of both knowing full well you yahoos ain't going to bother to read it. But here is the part that even a damn former court reporter should know better.

. It doesn’t specifically note in the indictment what the underlying crime is that’s supposed to justify this. But if it’s an alleged federal election issue discussed in the statement of facts, that’s a big problem since that would have to be pursued in a federal court.

I mean that is helluva stupid. No, federal charges do not have to have been filed, nor do they have to be filed. Hell, that is why they falsified business records, to COVER UP THE DAMN CRIME. So no damn wonder no federal charges have been filed. Now, if Trump is convicted on any of these charges the federal courts made take another look at it, but rather they do is not germane to this case and Trump's lawyers should have enough sense not to make that stupid ass argument. Although I don't know, they have shown themselves to pretty damn inept over the last couple of years.

No.
None of your words are actually truth, or fact.

 

[Billiejeens]

They're called Lawyers / Legal Experts.

For the Grand Jury to decide if criminal counts should be filed, to decide if the DA has a case or not and indictments should be issued / fed, the evidrnce - ALL the evidence - must be presented to the Grand Jury.

IOT get the Frand Jury to co.e up with 3r cou ts against Trump DA Bragg WUTHHELD EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE from the Grand Jury.

How can you hope yo come off as knowing what you are talking about if you don't rven know THIS much?

You would know this if you opened / read provided links and/ or did some research.

That is actually not true.
Grand juries only hear the prosecutor's side.
That is the point of a grand jury.

Sawry.

 

[bodecea]

'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...

Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

redstate.com

Keep telling yourself that.

 

[marvin martian]

'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...

Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

redstate.com

It would be interesting to find out how much Bragg was paid to chuck his career in the shitter. And who paid him.

 

[Billiejeens]

Everyone with an ounce of common sense is laughing at Bragga the Hut.

Sadly, even an ounce of common sense today is as rare as naturally occurring plutonium.

 

[easyt65]

It would be interesting to find out how much Bragg was paid to chuck his career in the shitter. And who paid him.

To leftists / snowflakes, he is a 'hero'.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Bragg is going to fail, then the leftards are going to pile on him, blaming him for their total failure.

Bragg is being set up.

Naah.

Of course it is.

The next Democratic candidate is going to get FUCKED. With a red hot poker.

Probably not.

It would be interesting to find out how much Bragg was paid to chuck his career in the shitter. And who paid him.

Soros, and I suspect the amount was his campaign fund.

Bragg should be disbarred and probably locked up for life for misconduct.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Billy000]

The Judge could send it back and tell Bragg to amend it to allege a crime.

If you guys want to cite an expert’s opinion then fine, but don’t pretend YOU know what the hell you’re talking about.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Trump should sue Bragg for personal damages and abuse of the system.

Hell yes, that is EXACTLY what he should do!

 

[Nostra]

It would be interesting to find out how much Bragg was paid to chuck his career in the shitter. And who paid him.

His owner Soros will be able to buy him another job.

 

[Nostra]

If you guys want to cite an expert’s opinion then fine, but don’t pretend YOU know what the hell you’re talking about.

Every legal expert I have heard comment on this, left and right, have all said Bragg has squat.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[marvin martian]

His owner Soros will be able to buy him another job.

Maybe, but Bragg has quickly become the laughingstock of the legal world.

 

[Billy000]

Every legal expert I have heard comment on this, left and right, have all said Bragg has squat.

The main takeaway I am getting from those unbiased is that the charges are valid, but these charges often fly under the radar for those with less than Trump’s profile.

 

[Blaster]

'Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.”

Across the judicial spectrum, in both sides of the aisle, the overall consensus is this case will never go to trial, may not make it to the next hearing...

Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump

redstate.com

My brother who is a lawyer calls this case pathetic.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If you guys want to cite an expert’s opinion then fine, but don’t pretend YOU know what the hell you’re talking about.

I DO know what I'm talking about. It is entirely within the judge's discretion to kick this indictment out and send it back. Trump's lawyers should make the next move a motion to dismiss.