PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Feb 24, 2014
- 44,141
- 2,773
You are incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
He refused to make the cake because if he did, he would be participating in a sacrilegious ceremony.
Again, incorrect.He refused to make the cake because if he did, he would be participating in a sacrilegious ceremony.
And there is no law in this land that can force people to commit sacrilege in order to stay in business.
You are both incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
You want STRAIGHTS ONLY bakeries. What kind of sign you going to hang on the window?"The baker not coming to my wedding is exactly the same as a lynching!"
He refused to make the cake because if he did, he would be participating in a sacrilegious ceremony.
And there is no law in this land that can force people to commit sacrilege in order to stay in business.
Sorry, but cake making is not a religious ceremony or form of worship.You are both incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
You cannot force a person to commit sacrilege to stay in business.
"Religious freedom is a fundamental human right that is guaranteed by the First Amendment's Free Exercise and Establishment clauses.[1] It encompasses not only the right to believe (or not to believe), but also the right to express and to manifest religious beliefs. These rights are fundamental and should not be subject to political process and majority votes."
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
They are correct, while you are not.You are both incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
You cannot force a person to commit sacrilege to stay in business.
"Religious freedom is a fundamental human right that is guaranteed by the First Amendment's Free Exercise and Establishment clauses.[1] It encompasses not only the right to believe (or not to believe), but also the right to express and to manifest religious beliefs. These rights are fundamental and should not be subject to political process and majority votes."
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
They are correct, while you are not.You are both incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
You cannot force a person to commit sacrilege to stay in business.
"Religious freedom is a fundamental human right that is guaranteed by the First Amendment's Free Exercise and Establishment clauses.[1] It encompasses not only the right to believe (or not to believe), but also the right to express and to manifest religious beliefs. These rights are fundamental and should not be subject to political process and majority votes."
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
That is correct, what isn't is Hobby Lobby saying we don't serve JWs.PS:
"In the Barnette decision, the Jehovah's Witnesses asserted that it was against their religious beliefs to pledge allegiance to a flag; they believed that their allegiance should be pledged solely to God. Because of their deeply held religious beliefs, Jehovah's Witnesses children who declined to recite the pledge in unison with others were expelled from schools. Their parents were thrown in jail and attacked and beaten on the streets in America. In the Barnette case, the Supreme Court finally sided with the ACLU and came down squarely in support of religious freedom and the freedom of conscience of religious believers.[6]"
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
That is correct, what isn't is Hobby Lobby saying we don't serve JWs.PS:
"In the Barnette decision, the Jehovah's Witnesses asserted that it was against their religious beliefs to pledge allegiance to a flag; they believed that their allegiance should be pledged solely to God. Because of their deeply held religious beliefs, Jehovah's Witnesses children who declined to recite the pledge in unison with others were expelled from schools. Their parents were thrown in jail and attacked and beaten on the streets in America. In the Barnette case, the Supreme Court finally sided with the ACLU and came down squarely in support of religious freedom and the freedom of conscience of religious believers.[6]"
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
Nothing loony about it, it's the law in some cases and PA laws are perfectly constitutional, and have been for decades.They are correct, while you are not.You are both incorrect, and out of your tiny little mind. The laws have been on the books for decades.You cannot force people to commit sacrilege to stay in business. It's against the law.
You cannot force a person to commit sacrilege to stay in business.
"Religious freedom is a fundamental human right that is guaranteed by the First Amendment's Free Exercise and Establishment clauses.[1] It encompasses not only the right to believe (or not to believe), but also the right to express and to manifest religious beliefs. These rights are fundamental and should not be subject to political process and majority votes."
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
They are correct, and so am I, since I agree with them. You loons are the ones claiming that PA has the authority to force bakers to participate in sacrilegious ceremonies, or lose their business licenses.
That is correct. Either bake for all or bake for none, your choice.That is correct, what isn't is Hobby Lobby saying we don't serve JWs.PS:
"In the Barnette decision, the Jehovah's Witnesses asserted that it was against their religious beliefs to pledge allegiance to a flag; they believed that their allegiance should be pledged solely to God. Because of their deeply held religious beliefs, Jehovah's Witnesses children who declined to recite the pledge in unison with others were expelled from schools. Their parents were thrown in jail and attacked and beaten on the streets in America. In the Barnette case, the Supreme Court finally sided with the ACLU and came down squarely in support of religious freedom and the freedom of conscience of religious believers.[6]"
The ACLU and Freedom of Religion and Belief American Civil Liberties Union
This is leftist loons saying that if bakers don't bring cakes to queers, they're going to be forced out of business.
The masses already do. Just a few loser like yourself are still around pissing into the wind and complaining about the rain.Yeah, it's not going to work out for you. We can't be forced to commit sacrilege, and it won't happen.
You can only force so much garbage on the masses. In the end, the masses are the majority, and the masses aren't interested in being forced to serve queers.