Let Me Get This Straight About Impeachment Over Trump's Ukraine Phone Call

[Faun]

Trump withheld the military aid before the phone call. That action was the threat and then he said we give you a lot of money and we want you to investigate Biden.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is and you are assigning bias. The fact is that the whistleblower's complaint has been proven. Trump is corrupt. He hires lobbyists to oversee the areas they lobbied in and sometimes the companies they worked in. Trump's rise to power and Hitler's rise to power were similar. Both scapegoated groups of people by using xenophobia.

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

 

[Faun]

Where was military aid mentioned by Trump in the phone call? Or did the second hand whistle blower read between the lines because being a partisan enemy of the president, he was looking for the slightest thing he could use for the Democrat party to rally around?

If the whistle blower so called, was just a random person without bias there would never have been a report on something so slight, and if the call was such a big deal, why didn't the person who handed off the incorrect information to the whistle blower make the report himself? Why? because this is the game the democrats like to play to get what they want. Trump is an outsider who is upsetting things for corrupt democrats and republicans alike, which is why he was made into Hitler by the Dems from the very beginning, he has to go by any means necessary.

Trump withheld the military aid before the phone call. That action was the threat and then he said we give you a lot of money and we want you to investigate Biden.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is and you are assigning bias. The fact is that the whistleblower's complaint has been proven. Trump is corrupt. He hires lobbyists to oversee the areas they lobbied in and sometimes the companies they worked in. Trump's rise to power and Hitler's rise to power were similar. Both scapegoated groups of people by using xenophobia.

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

I want a favor “though”

Pretty clear

if you read the transcript the favor wasnt about biden but about the DNC colluding with ukrainians to effect the 2016 elections,,,

Dumbfuck, that was one favor Trump asked for ... here's the "other."

"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."​

 

[progressive hunter]

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

that is well withing his authority, he is POTUS after all,,,and as an american citizen I demand that he follow up on it,,,
not his fault joe thought running for office would protect him

a) It's not in his authority to break the law which states you can't solicit foreign aid to benefit your own campaign.
b) You idiotically denied he asked Zelensky to investigate the Bidens. Hopefully, now you know better.

he is president trump first not candidate trump,,and like I said biden isnt protected because hes running for office,,

I dont see where he asked for an investigation for biden,,,

the big deal is going to be the DNC colluding with ukrainian officials to effect the 2016 election,,,

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

Faun, have you ever read the transcript?

Most of the shit you are alleging isn't even there! So are you stupid or lying? Which is it?

 

[Faun]

I'm crazy because you can't fucking read?

No, you're crazy because I already posted the law which does describe the criminal wrongdoing you idiotically claim is missing; AND the definition of "contribution" which shows Trump broke the law.

What you quoted was an FEC website. That is NOT the law, dumbass.

Moron, this is the law I posted...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

The red text highlights your error. There was nothing of value exchanged. NOTHING!

The information requested was in accordance with a criminal investigation of corruption, and had to do with Biden's son, and not Biden. The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value".

You libtards lump them together, so it is your error that is causing your confusion.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."​

 

[progressive hunter]

Trump withheld the military aid before the phone call. That action was the threat and then he said we give you a lot of money and we want you to investigate Biden.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is and you are assigning bias. The fact is that the whistleblower's complaint has been proven. Trump is corrupt. He hires lobbyists to oversee the areas they lobbied in and sometimes the companies they worked in. Trump's rise to power and Hitler's rise to power were similar. Both scapegoated groups of people by using xenophobia.

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

I want a favor “though”

Pretty clear

if you read the transcript the favor wasnt about biden but about the DNC colluding with ukrainians to effect the 2016 elections,,,

Dumbfuck, that was one favor Trump asked for ... here's the "other."

"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."​

thats not just within his authority but mandated by his oath of office to find out what happened,,,

your just mad that the people might find out what the democrats are really doing by colluding with foreign officials to effect the 2016 election,,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Why does Biden get a pass because he is a candidate for the Democrat nomination? It would seem that there would be a deliberate ignorance of the law in that case. putting Biden above the law.

Biden did not break any laws. Even Barr knows he doesn't have anything to base a investigation of Biden on.

no one has said he did,,,yet

What has been said is that Biden didn't break any laws.

what gets me is joe gets hostile and refuses to even talk about it,,,if nothing is wrong then why wont he explain what happened and prove nothing illegal happened,,
I am wondering why he used airforce two as a taxi cab for hunter at the same time a lot of this was supposed to have happen

Ahh, whynots... like whynot let Gordon Sondland testify ... and like whynot meet with Mueller ... and like whynot release his taxes ... ?

?????

 

[Faun]

Nope, we have proof Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate Biden. We also have proof that Trump withheld the $390 million in security assistance for his campaign.

That is not a foreign national, but a head of state. I am sure that means nothing to you because you are the consummate imbecile.

LOLOL

You dumbfuck...

Foreign nationals - FEC.gov

Definition

The following groups and individuals are considered "foreign nationals" and are subject to the prohibition:

• 
  
  
  • Foreign citizens (not including dual citizens of the United States);

• 
  
  
  • Immigrants who are not lawfully admitted for permanent residence;

• 
  
  
  • Foreign governments;

• 
  
  
  • Foreign political parties;

• 
  
  
  • Foreign corporations;

• 
  
  
  • Foreign associations;

• 
  
  
  • Foreign partnerships; and

• 
  
  
  • Any other foreign principal, as defined at 22 U.S.C. § 611(b), which includes a foreign organization or “other combination of persons organized under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country.”

Not law.

Dumbfuck, you think you know better than the FEC??

11 CFR § 110.20

3.Foreign national

i.A foreign principal, as defined in 22 U.S.C. 611(b); or

ii.An individual who is not a citizen of the United States and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20); however,

iii.Foreign national shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States, or who is a national of the United States as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22).​

Yeah, I do. Their interpretation on their website is wrong in this instance. Asking for an investigation into corruption covered by a treaty supersedes any and all federal laws unrelated to that treaty. Civics 101. You should have stayed awake.

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Then you should notify the FEC, not me, that your great and unmatched wisdom of the law proves they got it all wrong.

 

[Faun]

And asking for an investigation by a foreign government of an American citizen who happens to a political opponent of the President...is illegal

Withholding aid to force that to happen makes it doubly as bad

That is extortion and abuse of power

Gee, withholding aid to force someone to be fired is extortion and bragging about it is fricken idiotic...dumbass.

Oh? Cite the law it breaks to give another country free money with conditions....

 

[Faun]

And asking for an investigation by a foreign government of an American citizen who happens to a political opponent of the President...is illegal

Withholding aid to force that to happen makes it doubly as bad

That is extortion and abuse of power

Lush. you drinking again?

99% of America is Trump's political opponent. Running for president gives Biden no immunity.

He did not withhold aid for that reason. We have seen the texts between the ambassadors to Ukraine and the EU that prove that there was no quid pro quo as much as the libtards want to invent it. They were concerned that the new president would not fight corruption. Once that was established, the funds were released. Nothingburger?

That is not extortion and abuse of power. That is Trump doing his fucking job, dumbass!

No one said Biden gets immunity because he's running. What is being said is that one candidate cannot solicit a foreign national to help benefit their campaign.

 

[iceberg]

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

That's cute man. I gotta go. My apathy just got here.

 

[Faun]

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

that is well withing his authority, he is POTUS after all,,,and as an american citizen I demand that he follow up on it,,,
not his fault joe thought running for office would protect him

a) It's not in his authority to break the law which states you can't solicit foreign aid to benefit your own campaign.
b) You idiotically denied he asked Zelensky to investigate the Bidens. Hopefully, now you know better.

he is president trump first not candidate trump,,and like I said biden isnt protected because hes running for office,,

I dont see where he asked for an investigation for biden,,,

the big deal is going to be the DNC colluding with ukrainian officials to effect the 2016 election,,,

LOLOLOL

He's still campaigning for an upcoming election and therefore, bound by campaign finance laws. He's doesn't get to break those laws for any reason. The president is not above the law.

 

[Faun]

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

Faun, have you ever read the transcript?

Most of the shit you are alleging isn't even there! So are you stupid or lying? Which is it?

Dumbfuck, other than holding up the $250 million, which we know he did ... what was in my post that you think I didn't get from the transcript of their phone call...?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'm crazy because you can't fucking read?

No, you're crazy because I already posted the law which does describe the criminal wrongdoing you idiotically claim is missing; AND the definition of "contribution" which shows Trump broke the law.

What you quoted was an FEC website. That is NOT the law, dumbass.

Moron, this is the law I posted...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

The red text highlights your error. There was nothing of value exchanged. NOTHING!

The information requested was in accordance with a criminal investigation of corruption, and had to do with Biden's son, and not Biden. The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value".

You libtards lump them together, so it is your error that is causing your confusion.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."​

You need to seek out professional help with your lack of reading comprehension.

I said, "The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value"."

Why are you claiming I am wrong, when I stated that as fact?

You get dumber by the post! Go get a Q-tip and shove it in your ear. If you see brown stuff, it is obviously the shit you have for brains leaking out!

Seek medical attention!

 

[Faun]

thats not what trump said or what happened,,

and the WBers complaint has been proven wrong,,, you need to find another source for you info,,,

You are dense.
1. Trump withholds military aid to Ukraine
2. Trump tells Ukrainian President the US gives a lot of money to Ukraine
3. Trump asks for investigation of Biden even though there is no US investigation and Hunter Biden is under no suspicion of having broken any Ukrainian laws

The threat is clear.

I want a favor “though”

Pretty clear

if you read the transcript the favor wasnt about biden but about the DNC colluding with ukrainians to effect the 2016 elections,,,

Dumbfuck, that was one favor Trump asked for ... here's the "other."

"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."​

thats not just within his authority but mandated by his oath of office to find out what happened,,,

your just mad that the people might find out what the democrats are really doing by colluding with foreign officials to effect the 2016 election,,,,

Nothing in the Constitution authorizes a president to break any laws. They are sworn into office to uphold the law, not break it. You're dumber than shit to think there's any reason a president can break a law.

As far as Democrats colluding with Ukraine in the 2016 election -- why on Earth would I be mad about a rightarded myth?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens??? and how would you know if the US is investigating anyone let alone hunter???
and so far no one has accused hunter of committing any crimes,,,
and he is withing his authority to withhold money,,and it never came up in the phone call because thats not why he did,,

you have to broaden your sources ,,,

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

Faun, have you ever read the transcript?

Most of the shit you are alleging isn't even there! So are you stupid or lying? Which is it?

Dumbfuck, other than holding up the $250 million, which we know he did ... what was in my post that you think I didn't get from the transcript of their phone call...?

Find the words you used yourself. Keep digging, because they are not there.

Javelins were brought up by Zelensky in his third statement. In the President's next statement, he talked about Crowdstrike. Where is the quid pro quo?

 

[Wry Catcher]

So let me see if I understand the Democrats' position on this: Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid from Ukraine if Ukraine did not fire the prosecutor who was investigating the Ukrainian company that was paying Biden's drug-using, Navy-discharged-for-drug-use son Hunter $50K per month--and that's no big deal, nothing to see here. But, Donald Trump's request to Ukraine that Ukraine investigate the suspicious, apparently corrupt firing of that prosecutor is an impeachable offense!

Can you imagine what Democrats would be saying if Trump had a troubled son, if that troubled son were hired by a Ukrainian company for the amazing salary of $50K per month (even though the son possessed no job skills that would justify such a salary), if a Ukrainian prosecutor began to investigate the company that was paying Trump's troubled son such an exorbitant salary, if Trump then threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid to Ukraine if the prosecutor weren't fired, and if Ukraine then fired the prosecutor? They would justifiably argue that this smelled to high heaven of corruption.

So the Democrats want to impeach Trump because he wanted Ukraine to investigate what clearly appears to have been a case of corruption involving Joe Biden, his son, and the Ukrainian company, and the previous Ukrainian government that fired the prosecutor.

Character assassinations violate one of the 10 Commandments:

"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor"

 

[dblack]

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

Faun, have you ever read the transcript?

Most of the shit you are alleging isn't even there! So are you stupid or lying? Which is it?

Dumbfuck, other than holding up the $250 million, which we know he did ... what was in my post that you think I didn't get from the transcript of their phone call...?

Find the words you used yourself. Keep digging, because they are not there.

Javelins were brought up by Zelensky in his third statement. In the President's next statement, he talked about Crowdstrike. Where is the quid pro quo?

It's obvious to anyone who hasn't scored a set of them 'any-excuse'll-do', rose colored glasses you've been sporting.

 

[Faun]

No, you're crazy because I already posted the law which does describe the criminal wrongdoing you idiotically claim is missing; AND the definition of "contribution" which shows Trump broke the law.

What you quoted was an FEC website. That is NOT the law, dumbass.

Moron, this is the law I posted...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

The red text highlights your error. There was nothing of value exchanged. NOTHING!

The information requested was in accordance with a criminal investigation of corruption, and had to do with Biden's son, and not Biden. The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value".

You libtards lump them together, so it is your error that is causing your confusion.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."​

You need to seek out professional help with your lack of reading comprehension.

I said, "The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value"."

Why are you claiming I am wrong, when I stated that as fact?

You get dumber by the post! Go get a Q-tip and shove it in your ear. If you see brown stuff, it is obviously the shit you have for brains leaking out!

Seek medical attention!

LOL

Holyfuckingshit

You calling your claim a "fact" does not make it a fact.

Trying to eliminate candidates from the same election one is running in -- benefits their campaign. That makes it a "thing of value."

 

[Faun]

"when did he ask for an investigation into the bidens???"

Dayum, you brain-dead cultists sure do sport wood for Trump.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.​

in all fairness, biden never said it was for his son, people just made their own connection.

now "if you can look into it" suddenly means GOD DAMN IT INVESTIGATE!!!

my side can have open mic night of interpretation of what was meant, but they can't.

damn funny shit, mang.

Hmm, holding up $250 million .... asks Zelensky to "do us a favor though" in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us ... then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

Zelensky sure got the message ....

"I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation."​

Faun, have you ever read the transcript?

Most of the shit you are alleging isn't even there! So are you stupid or lying? Which is it?

Dumbfuck, other than holding up the $250 million, which we know he did ... what was in my post that you think I didn't get from the transcript of their phone call...?

Find the words you used yourself. Keep digging, because they are not there.

Javelins were brought up by Zelensky in his third statement. In the President's next statement, he talked about Crowdstrike. Where is the quid pro quo?

"Javelins were brought up by Zelensky"

Which I said, "in response to Zelensky opening the door to purchase Javelins from us"

So that came from the transcript.

"In the President's next statement, he talked about Crowdstrike."

And in Trump's next statement, he asked Zelensky to look into the Bidens, which is where I said, "then asks Zelensky to "look into it."

So that also came from the transcript.

"Where is the quid pro quo?"

I asked you, "other than holding up the $250 million, which we know he did ... what was in my post that you think I didn't get from the transcript of their phone call...?"

So now we see when you said, "Faun, have you ever read the transcript? Most of the shit you are alleging isn't even there! So are you stupid or lying? Which is it," that emanated from a position of sheer ignorance on your part; as everything I said in that post except for Trump holding up the $250 million came from the very same transcript you ignorantly questioned if I had read it.