Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wonder if any probate judge will have the principles and fortitude to NOT issue marriage licenses to queers tomorrow. I sure hope so. The south needs to stand tall against Tyranny once again...been fighting terrorism since 1861.
States Rights. Not a damn thing wrong with segregation...you tyrant lovers favorite dictator Lincoln wasn't to fond of the negro either....but yall can just ignore that now can't ya. Oh and I am no conservative.Don't mistake my hatred for queers as an endorsement of republican policies or thought.Wonder if any probate judge will have the principles and fortitude to NOT issue marriage licenses to queers tomorrow. I sure hope so. The south needs to stand tall against Tyranny once again...been fighting terrorism since 1861.
And fighting for slavery, segregation and pointless bigotry.
Sigh, eventually there's gonna be a conservative conception of 'freedom' that doesn't involve treating someone else like a piece of shit.
WKRG Chad Petri - Timeline Photos Facebook
And there is the first to PUBLICLY stand up to federal tyranny! KUDOS! Cheers!
To you. To me and millions of others its wonderful to see a state standing up to federal tyranny. I hope its the first shot being fired in the 2nd American Revolution.WKRG Chad Petri - Timeline Photos Facebook
And there is the first to PUBLICLY stand up to federal tyranny! KUDOS! Cheers!
A meaningless and symbolic gesture.
To you. To me and millions of others its wonderful to see a state standing up to federal tyranny. I hope its the first shot being fired in the 2nd American Revolution.WKRG Chad Petri - Timeline Photos Facebook
And there is the first to PUBLICLY stand up to federal tyranny! KUDOS! Cheers!
A meaningless and symbolic gesture.
States Rights. Not a damn thing wrong with segregation...you tyrant lovers favorite dictator Lincoln wasn't to fond of the negro either....but yall can just ignore that now can't ya. Oh and I am no conservative.Don't mistake my hatred for queers as an endorsement of republican policies or thought.Wonder if any probate judge will have the principles and fortitude to NOT issue marriage licenses to queers tomorrow. I sure hope so. The south needs to stand tall against Tyranny once again...been fighting terrorism since 1861.
And fighting for slavery, segregation and pointless bigotry.
Sigh, eventually there's gonna be a conservative conception of 'freedom' that doesn't involve treating someone else like a piece of shit.
To you. To me and millions of others its wonderful to see a state standing up to federal tyranny. I hope its the first shot being fired in the 2nd American Revolution.WKRG Chad Petri - Timeline Photos Facebook
And there is the first to PUBLICLY stand up to federal tyranny! KUDOS! Cheers!
A meaningless and symbolic gesture.
You mean the 14th amendment passed without allowing southern members of congress to vote on it? Yea that would be illegal therefore null and void. Same with 13th amendment.States Rights. Not a damn thing wrong with segregation...you tyrant lovers favorite dictator Lincoln wasn't to fond of the negro either....but yall can just ignore that now can't ya. Oh and I am no conservative.Don't mistake my hatred for queers as an endorsement of republican policies or thought.Wonder if any probate judge will have the principles and fortitude to NOT issue marriage licenses to queers tomorrow. I sure hope so. The south needs to stand tall against Tyranny once again...been fighting terrorism since 1861.
And fighting for slavery, segregation and pointless bigotry.
Sigh, eventually there's gonna be a conservative conception of 'freedom' that doesn't involve treating someone else like a piece of shit.
States don't have rights. People do. States have powers. And since the 14th amendment, the States Powers can't trump the people's rights save under very specific conditions: it has to serve a valid state interest, it has to serve a legitimate legislative end, and it has to have a very good reason.
And gay marriage bans can do any of the three.
And thanks for once again demonstrating that hatred of homosexuals is the at the root of much of the opposition to gay marriage.
You mean the 14th amendment passed without allowing southern members of congress to vote on it? Yea that would be illegal therefore null and void. Same with 13th amendment.States Rights. Not a damn thing wrong with segregation...you tyrant lovers favorite dictator Lincoln wasn't to fond of the negro either....but yall can just ignore that now can't ya. Oh and I am no conservative.Don't mistake my hatred for queers as an endorsement of republican policies or thought.Wonder if any probate judge will have the principles and fortitude to NOT issue marriage licenses to queers tomorrow. I sure hope so. The south needs to stand tall against Tyranny once again...been fighting terrorism since 1861.
And fighting for slavery, segregation and pointless bigotry.
Sigh, eventually there's gonna be a conservative conception of 'freedom' that doesn't involve treating someone else like a piece of shit.
States don't have rights. People do. States have powers. And since the 14th amendment, the States Powers can't trump the people's rights save under very specific conditions: it has to serve a valid state interest, it has to serve a legitimate legislative end, and it has to have a very good reason.
And gay marriage bans can do any of the three.
And thanks for once again demonstrating that hatred of homosexuals is the at the root of much of the opposition to gay marriage.
Argument 2! Right on cue.Argument 1They do have the same rights. Marriage laws have never discriminated against them. Ever.By enjoying those benefits and arguing that homosexuals should not have the same rights as you and your wife enjoy.
In the same way that marriage laws never discriminated against mixed race couples.
You guys are so predictable.
They argue in tiny little ignorant circles.
Kinda like how you discriminate in ignorant little circles. BTW...guess which argument is winning?
No, the pro traditional marriage case is much stronger intellectually.
You mean gay liberal judges? Yeah an explicit sentence in the Constitution doesnt persuade them while a concocted theory based on nothing does. That pretty well shows the extent of their intellect. Yours too, for that matter.No, the pro traditional marriage case is much stronger intellectually.
Golly, that must be why all these judges, conservative and "liberal" are laughing at the "intellect" of the arguments...and ruling against you.
Facts remain my friend...You need 3/4ths of the states to agree to a new amendment...that didn't happen therefore they aren't legal. Oh and Your pal Lincoln is the one that called up the military and attacked the CSA....You mean the 14th amendment passed without allowing southern members of congress to vote on it? Yea that would be illegal therefore null and void. Same with 13th amendment.States Rights. Not a damn thing wrong with segregation...you tyrant lovers favorite dictator Lincoln wasn't to fond of the negro either....but yall can just ignore that now can't ya. Oh and I am no conservative.Don't mistake my hatred for queers as an endorsement of republican policies or thought.Wonder if any probate judge will have the principles and fortitude to NOT issue marriage licenses to queers tomorrow. I sure hope so. The south needs to stand tall against Tyranny once again...been fighting terrorism since 1861.
And fighting for slavery, segregation and pointless bigotry.
Sigh, eventually there's gonna be a conservative conception of 'freedom' that doesn't involve treating someone else like a piece of shit.
States don't have rights. People do. States have powers. And since the 14th amendment, the States Powers can't trump the people's rights save under very specific conditions: it has to serve a valid state interest, it has to serve a legitimate legislative end, and it has to have a very good reason.
And gay marriage bans can do any of the three.
And thanks for once again demonstrating that hatred of homosexuals is the at the root of much of the opposition to gay marriage.
So slavery is still legal? The Supreme Court says otherwise. As does sequence. The ex-Confederate States hadn't been readmitted to the union at the time of the vote for the 13th amendment was taken. Same for the 14th. Making even the possibility of their participation in the amendment process moot.
If you stupid fucks had wanted a say, you shouldn't have seceded from the union and waged war on the nation. Then your participation would have been requisite on any vote for the amendments.
Not so fastShould be happening any minute now...
Meet 21 Gay Couples Getting Married in Alabama on Monday (That's right, Alabama)
Not so fastShould be happening any minute now...
Meet 21 Gay Couples Getting Married in Alabama on Monday (That's right, Alabama)
Alabama chief justice tells probate judges not to issue gay marriage licenses Fox News
80% of AL voters want one man one woman as the marriage standard. If overturning that is not tyranny I dont know what is.