Agit8r
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2010
- 12,141
- 2,209
- 245
The two are synonymous. The data doesn't know either....Have you looked at the data?No time for desperate, retarded hair splitting semantics. Try again please.Look...anyone half sane knows the darker the group the greater the liability just as ALL statistics prove. I don't make this shit up do I Mac1958 ?Not really to do with browner. Just time marching on.View attachment 353726
Nah, that’s pussy shit, that doesn’t work. Show us that a browner America is a better America and I’ll show you why Whitey resists your agenda.
If a Browner, Gayer nation is one far more criminal why would Democrats encourage such a movement?
Incarceration rates--like with conviction statistics--do not correlate directly to the level of criminality. It may tell you who had adequate legal representation, who judge and jury might be biased for or against etc.
Liability? In what sense?
A net loss to the core citizenry. A simple connecting of the dots and there it is...all over the wall for all to see. Our founders were right all along per the naturalization act of 1790.
A lot of Americans of African descent pass as white, and may not have any idea until they take a DNA test. Skin pigmentation is not necessarily an indicator, as superficial "whiteness" is just due to compoundings of albinic genetic traits, rather than racial purity (which is the stuff of myth). Here’s where "white" Americans have the highest percentage of African ancestry
So which are you saying matters? Genetics or the skin tone itself?
No they aren't. Nicole Richie is lighter than some Basque people. Basques are indigenous Europeans. Skin tone is just that, skin deep.