Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rawley, you sound like a fatuous polysci teacher who knows nothing.How much discovery was Trump allowed? How many of their witnesses was he allowed to depose? How many evidentiary hearings were there?
With every one of your posts you blare your abject ignorance of what due process is.
Which amendment will be used?Goody, wait til you hear what the Red States remove Biden from the ballot for.
Your rules.
Your game.
You will hate it.
/---/ The same one you're using on Trump.Which amendment will be used?
I do like you. But when you start with the gratuitous insults, it's an asshole move. And to me, signals your admission that you don't have an argument and have to resort to insults.Rawley, you sound like a fatuous polysci teacher who knows nothing.
The procedures of the laws involved were followed.
That's the end of it. Whether you or me or Berg like it or not, does not matter.
I have. You haven’t. That’s why I bothered to look up exactly what the Trump legal team was contending. I even looked up the main case on which they have relied. I read those papers. Unlike you, I actually understand the points being made.Like you have?
Proving once again what a low IQ hack you are.Funny, but quite a few judges have found those 'circumstances' have definitely been met.
Perhaps you just a dumbass.
They may be meaningless to you. But I can assure you they aren't meaningless to Trump. Because they were based on the kind of evidence cucks like you like to pretend doesn't exist.Yes, I do remember those totally meaningless indictments.
once again, you lie to evade the consequences of your own ignorance.Once again you speak about things you have no knowledge of.
Horseshit.Rawley, you sound like a fatuous polysci teacher who knows nothing.
The procedures of the laws involved were followed.
That's the end of it. Whether you or me or Berg like it or not, does not matter.
In the civil trial where he was found to have engaged in insurrection.No. Where is the verdict in law that he comitted Insurrection?
A rather stupid one.Nope. It would be a Fuck you message.
See post 831.See post #830.
Derp…Her attempt to make public policy based on her interpretation of the US Constitution will be short-lived. That's why she paused her decision pending a potential appeal in state court. It will be rejected quickly.
The clause in question (below) doesn't mention the president and the Constitution is explicit by that omission that it does not pertain to the president. It specifies US Senators and Representatives and State legislators. If they wanted this to apply to the president, it would have been spelled out. The Colorado ruling that the term "officer of the United States" means that this clause applies to the president will be overturned.
Then of course you have the facts that that wasn't an insurrection and Trump publicly encouraged peaceful and law-abiding protest.
The good part of the Jack Smith persecution will be exposing Pelosi and how this was a setup.
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Uh huh…The purpose was to delay certification until a true court hearing of all evidence was presented.
www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com
Yet here you are.Dishonest, overheated hyperbole isn't an argument
Link me up to this guilty verdict, Vermin.Lame reply!
The house and 57 Senators also found him guilty.
It's hard to believe that you're stupid enough to believe that you can gas-light me or anyone else into believing Trump is innocent.
