Let's make something clear.

Thinking for yourself too difficult? Imagine my surprise.
/----/

1704372734942.png
 
Is posting a fatuous cartoon your idea of thinking for yourself?
/----/ Nothing foolish about it. Humor is an effective communication tool and a way to communicate ideas with Libtard Moonbats with short attention spans.

It's all based on truth. Biden did say he was saving democracy. And his fellow democrats are trying to remove their political rival from the ballot and throw him in jail. And Biden is know to use the expression come on man.
So what is fatuous about the meme?
1704378315840.png
 
And his fellow democrats are trying to remove their political rival from the ballot and throw him in jail.
Because he committed crimes against America. Is the Biden admin supposed to turn a blind eye to criminality because the criminals are members of the opposing political party?
BTW, you do remember it was numerous grand juries who recommended indicting the Orange Insurrectionist, right?
 
Last edited:
Because he committed crimes against America. Is the Biden admin supposed to turn a blind eye to criminality because the criminals are members of the opposing political party?
His only CRIME was defeating your queen the Hilda-BEAST!!!!!
HahahahahahahHahahahahHahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:dev3:
 
Because he committed crimes against America. Is the Biden admin supposed to turn a blind eye to criminality because the criminals are members of the opposing political party?
BTW, you do remember it was numerous grand juries who recommended indicting the Orange Insurrectionist, right?
/----/ "Because he committed crimes against America"
Only in your demented, hate filled brain.
 
Wrong. You wouldn’t know anything about sanity, anyway.

The 14th Amendment, per section 3, serves only to disqualify a candidate under specific circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met.

You’re a hack.

Funny, but quite a few judges have found those 'circumstances' have definitely been met.

Perhaps you just a dumbass.
 
At least you're being honest about the New Democrat party. Take away rights and fuck due process
Regarding the case adjudicated in CO, 5 days of evidence was presented during the lower court hearing, the SC considered that evidence along with arguments from both sides of the issue during its review of the ruling, and the appeal is headed for the SCOTUS. CO's SC ruling has been stayed pending appeal.
So take your due process argument and stick it.
 
Regarding the case adjudicated in CO, 5 days of evidence was presented during the lower court hearing, the SC considered that evidence along with arguments from both sides of the issue during its review of the ruling, and the appeal is headed for the SCOTUS. CO's SC ruling has been stayed pending appeal.

How much discovery was Trump allowed? How many of their witnesses was he allowed to depose? How many evidentiary hearings were there?
So take your due process argument and stick it.
With every one of your posts you blare your abject ignorance of what due process is.
 
BTW, you do remember it was numerous grand juries who recommended indicting the Orange Insurrectionist based on the overwhelming evidence presented to them, right?
/----/ "BTW, you do remember it was numerous grand juries who recommended indicting"
Yes, I do remember those totally meaningless indictments. You can also indict a ham sandwich, as the saying goes. Anything you clowns can do to get the number one opponent off the ballot is OK.
1704386380069.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top