Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the state has a compelling interest in it. Because marriage and the family are the bedrock of society. Because the 10thA reserves to states rights not enumerated in the Constitution. Ergo states have the power to define marriage, not some unelected judge somewhere.
50% divorce rate is the bedrock of US society? Damn, absolutely screwed.
So now you're using the 10th amendment to make your point, and ignoring the 9th, and 14th, and the Supreme Court decisions on this? Well done.
So gay and lesbian couples want the same marital benefits that are afforded to married heterosexual couples? Why is that a bad thing?No, actually you tell me. You were the one who said that gays want to get married because "it's about the money." What money are you talking about?
The marital benefits that accrue legally. Or did you miss that part of the gay agenda?
You obviously don't know what equality means. If you pass a law which states that legally recognized marriages are only between one man and one woman, then homosexual and lesbian couples are prohibited from having a legally recognized marriage, because a homosexual couple has one man and one man, not one man and one woman. Therefore, that is not equality under the law for the homosexual couple.If you pass a law that defines legal marriage as being between one man and one woman, then gay and lesbian couples can't legally get married. That means that they are prohibited from getting married. That is not equality under the law. That is due only to Christians using public laws to enforce their small-minded, outdated religious dogma on secular society in violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
Religion has nothing to do with it, it's called biology. And your saying they can't marry is bullshit, they have been getting married form the dawn of time, they just have been following the rules and marrying someone who is biologically compatible. That is equality.
How do you get equality from passing a law which specifically forbids equality?
You obviously don't know what equality means. If you pass a law which states that legally recognized marriages are only between one man and one woman, then homosexual and lesbian couples are prohibited from having a legally recognized marriage, because a homosexual couple has one man and one man, not one man and one woman. Therefore, that is not equality under the law for the homosexual couple.Religion has nothing to do with it, it's called biology. And your saying they can't marry is bullshit, they have been getting married form the dawn of time, they just have been following the rules and marrying someone who is biologically compatible. That is equality.
How do you get equality from passing a law which specifically forbids equality?
How about a law that prohibits marriage between two consanguinous people? Between a man and a sheep? You are denying people the right to marry the animal of their choice. It is inequality.
Get it?
Marriage rate - 6.8 per 1,000 total population
Divorce rate - 3.6 per 1,000 total population
FASTSTATS - Marriage and Divorce
Marriage rate - 6.8 per 1,000 total population
Divorce rate - 3.6 per 1,000 total population
FASTSTATS - Marriage and Divorce
They should have them because that's EQUALITY UNDER THE FUCKING LAW.So gay and lesbian couples want the same marital benefits that are afforded to married heterosexual couples? Why is that a bad thing?The marital benefits that accrue legally. Or did you miss that part of the gay agenda?
Why should they have them? Heterosexual couples should have them because the state has an interest in fostering heterosexual marriages. The state has no interest in fostering homosexual marriages.
50% divorce rate (and that's inaccurate) is irrelevant to the fact that most people who get married have children.
If there is a right to marry, then the power to define marriage rests with the states, not unelected judges. Something about they derive their legitimate power from the consent of the goverened.
They should have them because that's EQUALITY UNDER THE FUCKING LAW.So gay and lesbian couples want the same marital benefits that are afforded to married heterosexual couples? Why is that a bad thing?
Why should they have them? Heterosexual couples should have them because the state has an interest in fostering heterosexual marriages. The state has no interest in fostering homosexual marriages.
RuPaul is a gay man dressed up like a woman. Are you aware of this? If you are indeed a fan of RuPaul as you seem to suggest at the end of every single one of your posts, then why do you not want him to have the same rights and privileges as every other American? Are you one of those old white racist fucks who loved Al Jolson but wouldn't ever want to see him in a voting booth?
Do you seriously believe any of the shit that you write?
That doesnt really equate to 50% but whatever. It is irrelevant no matter what the rate.
They have equality under the law, admit it, any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man. You keep dancing and deflecting but can't prove me wrong, can you?
That isn't equality for homosexuals and lesbians and you know it, so stop being a moron.They have equality under the law, admit it, any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man. You keep dancing and deflecting but can't prove me wrong, can you?
They have equality under the law, admit it, any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man. You keep dancing and deflecting but can't prove me wrong, can you?
Separate is NOT equal, this was decided in the 1960s.
Why not prevent black people from marrying white people? It's just as fair as only allowing gay people to marry people they don't want to.
They are not separate, there is no separation in what I said. If there is, show it to me.
That isn't equality for homosexuals and lesbians and you know it, so stop being a moron.They have equality under the law, admit it, any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man. You keep dancing and deflecting but can't prove me wrong, can you?
Do you write things like that with the intention of being taken seriously?
You're the moron, gender is determined at birth, you can talk your bullshit but you can't change biology. You keep making fun of religious people, yet you believe gay exist, but how can you prove it? Like religion, gay is in the mind and our law address the physical being, isn't that the way you want it?
Why does anyone need to prove whether gay people exist or not?
Someone wants to marry someone of the same sex. What's it to you or the govt?
They are not separate, there is no separation in what I said. If there is, show it to me.
Separate in, a gay person cannot marry a consenting adult of their CHOICE, whereas a straight person can.
You're the moron, gender is determined at birth, you can talk your bullshit but you can't change biology. You keep making fun of religious people, yet you believe gay exist, but how can you prove it? Like religion, gay is in the mind and our law address the physical being, isn't that the way you want it?
Why does anyone need to prove whether gay people exist or not?
Someone wants to marry someone of the same sex. What's it to you or the govt?
So you want our laws to accommodate your phantom beliefs, but heaven forbid they consider the beliefs of Christians. Where's the equality in that? Also, why do you keep ignoring the science aspect of the discussion?
Incorrect, a straight guy can't marry another guy even if he wanted to just to get the benefits.
