JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
This guy defends the use of violence by libtards against Trump by citing MArxist agitators in Europe who attack people opposed to more Muslim refugee immigration.
And all of it is paid for by George Soros who should be rotting in prison for a dozen crimes.
Huffington Post writer calls violence 'logical' response to Trump | Fox News
A writer for the Huffington Post is defending his recent op-ed that "a violent response” is the “logical” approach to stopping presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.
Jesse Benn wrote in the op-ed titled “Sorry Liberals, A Violent Response To Trump Is As Logical As Any,” posted on Monday, “[T]here’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this.”
"These denunciations of violence from anti-Trump protestors rest on the misguided view that the divide Trump’s exposed is a typical political disagreement between partisans, and should be handled as such.," he wrote. "This couldn’t be further from the truth. Trump might not be a fascist in the 20th century European sense of the term—though many of his supporters are—but he might represent its 21st century US version."
"Violent resistance matters. Riots can lead to major change," Benn wrote. "It’s not liberal politicians or masses that historians identify as the spark underlying the modern movement for LGBTQ equality. Nor was it a think piece from some smarmy liberal writer. It was the people who took to the streets during the Stonewall Uprising."
"Assuming anti-Trump protests should be strictly focused on electoral politics and not these broader goals would be a detrimental oversight," he wrote. "Understanding European anti-fascists use of violent tactics to shut down large rallies from White Supremacists can be illustrative here. Because while Trump isn’t leading full bore White Supremacist rallies, there is value in making it clear that even his fascism-lite has no place in civilized society."
This idiot makes it perfectly clear. White people cannot depend on the civil authorities to defend us, nor the common decency so lacking among liberals today.
We have to go in in groups ready to fight back and be armed as a contingency against these bastards when we have the legal right to defend ourselves from assault by multiple parties.
Justifiable homicide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
At future rallies, Trump supporters should have volunteer escort groups that protect innocent supporters from the violence of these fascistic leftwing radicals, and be prepared to use violence in self defense. And for that you need to read up on the self defense laws of your state. If you have a CCW, you likely already know what the law is, but a refresher wouldnt hurt.
And all of it is paid for by George Soros who should be rotting in prison for a dozen crimes.
Huffington Post writer calls violence 'logical' response to Trump | Fox News
A writer for the Huffington Post is defending his recent op-ed that "a violent response” is the “logical” approach to stopping presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.
Jesse Benn wrote in the op-ed titled “Sorry Liberals, A Violent Response To Trump Is As Logical As Any,” posted on Monday, “[T]here’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this.”
"These denunciations of violence from anti-Trump protestors rest on the misguided view that the divide Trump’s exposed is a typical political disagreement between partisans, and should be handled as such.," he wrote. "This couldn’t be further from the truth. Trump might not be a fascist in the 20th century European sense of the term—though many of his supporters are—but he might represent its 21st century US version."
"Violent resistance matters. Riots can lead to major change," Benn wrote. "It’s not liberal politicians or masses that historians identify as the spark underlying the modern movement for LGBTQ equality. Nor was it a think piece from some smarmy liberal writer. It was the people who took to the streets during the Stonewall Uprising."
"Assuming anti-Trump protests should be strictly focused on electoral politics and not these broader goals would be a detrimental oversight," he wrote. "Understanding European anti-fascists use of violent tactics to shut down large rallies from White Supremacists can be illustrative here. Because while Trump isn’t leading full bore White Supremacist rallies, there is value in making it clear that even his fascism-lite has no place in civilized society."
This idiot makes it perfectly clear. White people cannot depend on the civil authorities to defend us, nor the common decency so lacking among liberals today.
We have to go in in groups ready to fight back and be armed as a contingency against these bastards when we have the legal right to defend ourselves from assault by multiple parties.
Justifiable homicide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
At future rallies, Trump supporters should have volunteer escort groups that protect innocent supporters from the violence of these fascistic leftwing radicals, and be prepared to use violence in self defense. And for that you need to read up on the self defense laws of your state. If you have a CCW, you likely already know what the law is, but a refresher wouldnt hurt.
