bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
Those "actual cases" were for pollution caused by automobiles. They were correlated with living in an urban environment, now with coal fired power plants, and even the authors admitted there were other possible explanations than pollution.I have to apologize for being a bit slow and wasting your time.ROFL! So one coal fired power plant has a 7% greater number of cancer cases than the surrounding area? You realize, of course, that there are such clusters all over the country, and the medical community has no idea what has caused most of them. You might have something credible if you found such a cluster around every coal fired power plant.
Although I provided a number of studies, there is absolutely no evidence you would accept that contradicted your OP. You dismiss population studies as merely statistics and when I provide actual cases as you requested you dismiss them because there is no statistical evidence.
You are right about one thing, I except no evidence from the pro-regulation lobby. Most of what I've seen is junk science. The EPA is well known for paying other organizations with an agenda for "research."