Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Contemporary conservatism's fatal flaw is that it is represented by people like the OP. Its decline in popularity is attributable in large part to its repulsive messengers.
Now, to address the thread specifically, there is a direct correlation. The proliferation of repulsive representatives of conservatism has effectively opened the door for a strong lurch to the left, and that's precisely what we're seeing. Leftists - and I don't mean traditional liberals, I mean hardcore leftists - should thank their lucky stars for conservative talk radio and its faithful and obedient adherents, obviously including the OP. You're getting a valuable assist here.
Yes, the far left has become stronger and more emboldened, in large part because of the unattractive antics of the far right. And whatever weaknesses and flaws you may want to attribute to liberalism will manifest more quickly and more broadly because of people like the OP.
It's happening by comparison.
.
No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination of our young people into the failed belief in modern left wing liberalism/progressivism/regressivism..........the government schools....controlled by the left wing education branch of the democrat party uses those 12-16 years to teach a failed system.......and then you guys say ......see.....people don't like conservatism......
Give us 12-16 years of unfettered access to teach about liberty, individual rights and responsibilities, limited government, checks and balances....and free markets....and we would have the wealthiest, healthiest and most powerful country in the world.......
But we have a 5th column of lefty nuts who have taken over education, the government bureacracies, journalism and entertainment......and they still can't completely control the country....
Why would liberals be able to exercise dictatorial control over public education when in fact the governing structure of public education at every level is
by ELECTED officials, or by people appointed or hired by elected officials?
Don't conservatives vote?
Contemporary conservatism's fatal flaw is that it is represented by people like the OP. Its decline in popularity is attributable in large part to its repulsive messengers.
Now, to address the thread specifically, there is a direct correlation. The proliferation of repulsive representatives of conservatism has effectively opened the door for a strong lurch to the left, and that's precisely what we're seeing. Leftists - and I don't mean traditional liberals, I mean hardcore leftists - should thank their lucky stars for conservative talk radio and its faithful and obedient adherents, obviously including the OP. You're getting a valuable assist here.
Yes, the far left has become stronger and more emboldened, in large part because of the unattractive antics of the far right. And whatever weaknesses and flaws you may want to attribute to liberalism will manifest more quickly and more broadly because of people like the OP.
It's happening by comparison.
.
No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination of our young people into the failed belief in modern left wing liberalism/progressivism/regressivism..........the government schools....controlled by the left wing education branch of the democrat party uses those 12-16 years to teach a failed system.......and then you guys say ......see.....people don't like conservatism......
Give us 12-16 years of unfettered access to teach about liberty, individual rights and responsibilities, limited government, checks and balances....and free markets....and we would have the wealthiest, healthiest and most powerful country in the world.......
But we have a 5th column of lefty nuts who have taken over education, the government bureacracies, journalism and entertainment......and they still can't completely control the country....
Why would liberals be able to exercise dictatorial control over public education when in fact the governing structure of public education at every level is
by ELECTED officials, or by people appointed or hired by elected officials?
Don't conservatives vote?
The teachers unions and their membership are predominantly left wing...or neutral.......and so those not specifically conservative outnumber the conservatives.......it is in the classroom where the left wing crap gets taught......
Sometimes, i dont believe i know you, 2aguy.Bah. Hand me a drink, im having sex
Does your wife or husband know?
Contemporary conservatism's fatal flaw is that it is represented by people like the OP. Its decline in popularity is attributable in large part to its repulsive messengers.
Now, to address the thread specifically, there is a direct correlation. The proliferation of repulsive representatives of conservatism has effectively opened the door for a strong lurch to the left, and that's precisely what we're seeing. Leftists - and I don't mean traditional liberals, I mean hardcore leftists - should thank their lucky stars for conservative talk radio and its faithful and obedient adherents, obviously including the OP. You're getting a valuable assist here.
Yes, the far left has become stronger and more emboldened, in large part because of the unattractive antics of the far right. And whatever weaknesses and flaws you may want to attribute to liberalism will manifest more quickly and more broadly because of people like the OP.
It's happening by comparison.
.
No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination of our young people into the failed belief in modern left wing liberalism/progressivism/regressivism..........the government schools....controlled by the left wing education branch of the democrat party uses those 12-16 years to teach a failed system.......and then you guys say ......see.....people don't like conservatism......
Give us 12-16 years of unfettered access to teach about liberty, individual rights and responsibilities, limited government, checks and balances....and free markets....and we would have the wealthiest, healthiest and most powerful country in the world.......
But we have a 5th column of lefty nuts who have taken over education, the government bureacracies, journalism and entertainment......and they still can't completely control the country....
Contemporary conservatism's fatal flaw is that it is represented by people like the OP. Its decline in popularity is attributable in large part to its repulsive messengers.
Now, to address the thread specifically, there is a direct correlation. The proliferation of repulsive representatives of conservatism has effectively opened the door for a strong lurch to the left, and that's precisely what we're seeing. Leftists - and I don't mean traditional liberals, I mean hardcore leftists - should thank their lucky stars for conservative talk radio and its faithful and obedient adherents, obviously including the OP. You're getting a valuable assist here.
Yes, the far left has become stronger and more emboldened, in large part because of the unattractive antics of the far right. And whatever weaknesses and flaws you may want to attribute to liberalism will manifest more quickly and more broadly because of people like the OP.
It's happening by comparison.
.
No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination of our young people into the failed belief in modern left wing liberalism/progressivism/regressivism..........the government schools....controlled by the left wing education branch of the democrat party uses those 12-16 years to teach a failed system.......and then you guys say ......see.....people don't like conservatism......
Give us 12-16 years of unfettered access to teach about liberty, individual rights and responsibilities, limited government, checks and balances....and free markets....and we would have the wealthiest, healthiest and most powerful country in the world.......
But we have a 5th column of lefty nuts who have taken over education, the government bureacracies, journalism and entertainment......and they still can't completely control the country....
"...No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination..."
Followed by a lifetime of the media and the entertainment industry.
1. Dennis Prager:
Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing! Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas. Brainwashed?
Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.
Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.
2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.
a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) inPWW(The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.
b.
Sometimes, i dont believe i know you, 2aguy.Bah. Hand me a drink, im having sex
Does your wife or husband know?
No one knows me.....I am unknowable......
Sometimes, i dont believe i know you, 2aguy.Bah. Hand me a drink, im having sex
Does your wife or husband know?
No one knows me.....I am unknowable......
Perhaps even......
.....ineffable.
Contemporary conservatism's fatal flaw is that it is represented by people like the OP. Its decline in popularity is attributable in large part to its repulsive messengers.
Now, to address the thread specifically, there is a direct correlation. The proliferation of repulsive representatives of conservatism has effectively opened the door for a strong lurch to the left, and that's precisely what we're seeing. Leftists - and I don't mean traditional liberals, I mean hardcore leftists - should thank their lucky stars for conservative talk radio and its faithful and obedient adherents, obviously including the OP. You're getting a valuable assist here.
Yes, the far left has become stronger and more emboldened, in large part because of the unattractive antics of the far right. And whatever weaknesses and flaws you may want to attribute to liberalism will manifest more quickly and more broadly because of people like the OP.
It's happening by comparison.
.
No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination of our young people into the failed belief in modern left wing liberalism/progressivism/regressivism..........the government schools....controlled by the left wing education branch of the democrat party uses those 12-16 years to teach a failed system.......and then you guys say ......see.....people don't like conservatism......
Give us 12-16 years of unfettered access to teach about liberty, individual rights and responsibilities, limited government, checks and balances....and free markets....and we would have the wealthiest, healthiest and most powerful country in the world.......
But we have a 5th column of lefty nuts who have taken over education, the government bureacracies, journalism and entertainment......and they still can't completely control the country....
Why would liberals be able to exercise dictatorial control over public education when in fact the governing structure of public education at every level is
by ELECTED officials, or by people appointed or hired by elected officials?
Don't conservatives vote?
The teachers unions and their membership are predominantly left wing...or neutral.......and so those not specifically conservative outnumber the conservatives.......it is in the classroom where the left wing crap gets taught......
You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.1. No ideology has ever been as good at the use of propaganda as the modern iteration of liberalism.
This is why it remains the most dynamic religion of our age.
Most important is to bear in mind that nothing could be further from the attitudes and values under which America was created, than that very ideology, Modern Liberalism.
Classical liberalism, the views if the Founders, what would be called conservatism today, is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Modern Liberalism finds at its center, material equality.
That is its fatal flaw.
2. "The division between classical and modern liberals is often represented as paralleling the tension between liberty and equality. Where classical liberalism saw individual liberty as the driving force behind peace and prosperity, the modern variety puts more emphasis on equality." Who Cares about Inequality? | Don Watkins
3. To see the roots of 'Liberalism," and its commections to material equality, know this:
"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world."
Dennis Prager
4. "The only kind of equality that is possible is also the only kind that matters: political equality. Political equality refers to equality of rights. Before the creation of the United States, every system of government had taken for granted that some people were entitled to rule others, taking away their freedom and property whenever some allegedly “greater good” demanded it.
The Founders rejected that notion. Each individual, they held, is to be regarded by the government as having the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as any other individual. So long as he didn’t violate other people’s rights, he was free to set his own course and live on his own terms.
..... the Founders transformed the state from an instrument of oppression into an instrument of liberation: it liberated the individual so that he was free to make the most of his life."
Fee, Op. Cit.
Yet, there are still enough gullible voters who imagine that things will only be taken away from others....and given to them.
They're called Liberals.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
Contemporary conservatism's fatal flaw is that it is represented by people like the OP. Its decline in popularity is attributable in large part to its repulsive messengers.
Now, to address the thread specifically, there is a direct correlation. The proliferation of repulsive representatives of conservatism has effectively opened the door for a strong lurch to the left, and that's precisely what we're seeing. Leftists - and I don't mean traditional liberals, I mean hardcore leftists - should thank their lucky stars for conservative talk radio and its faithful and obedient adherents, obviously including the OP. You're getting a valuable assist here.
Yes, the far left has become stronger and more emboldened, in large part because of the unattractive antics of the far right. And whatever weaknesses and flaws you may want to attribute to liberalism will manifest more quickly and more broadly because of people like the OP.
It's happening by comparison.
.
No...what you are seeing is 12-16 years of indoctrination of our young people into the failed belief in modern left wing liberalism/progressivism/regressivism..........the government schools....controlled by the left wing education branch of the democrat party uses those 12-16 years to teach a failed system.......and then you guys say ......see.....people don't like conservatism......
Give us 12-16 years of unfettered access to teach about liberty, individual rights and responsibilities, limited government, checks and balances....and free markets....and we would have the wealthiest, healthiest and most powerful country in the world.......
But we have a 5th column of lefty nuts who have taken over education, the government bureacracies, journalism and entertainment......and they still can't completely control the country....
Why would liberals be able to exercise dictatorial control over public education when in fact the governing structure of public education at every level is
by ELECTED officials, or by people appointed or hired by elected officials?
Don't conservatives vote?
The teachers unions and their membership are predominantly left wing...or neutral.......and so those not specifically conservative outnumber the conservatives.......it is in the classroom where the left wing crap gets taught......
Total dodge of the question, imbecile.
You bitch about liberals running the schools?
Elect a conservative school board. Elect a conservative state legislature. Elect a conservative President and Congress.
You people are too lazy to do anything but bitch.
You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.1. No ideology has ever been as good at the use of propaganda as the modern iteration of liberalism.
This is why it remains the most dynamic religion of our age.
Most important is to bear in mind that nothing could be further from the attitudes and values under which America was created, than that very ideology, Modern Liberalism.
Classical liberalism, the views if the Founders, what would be called conservatism today, is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Modern Liberalism finds at its center, material equality.
That is its fatal flaw.
2. "The division between classical and modern liberals is often represented as paralleling the tension between liberty and equality. Where classical liberalism saw individual liberty as the driving force behind peace and prosperity, the modern variety puts more emphasis on equality." Who Cares about Inequality? | Don Watkins
3. To see the roots of 'Liberalism," and its commections to material equality, know this:
"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world."
Dennis Prager
4. "The only kind of equality that is possible is also the only kind that matters: political equality. Political equality refers to equality of rights. Before the creation of the United States, every system of government had taken for granted that some people were entitled to rule others, taking away their freedom and property whenever some allegedly “greater good” demanded it.
The Founders rejected that notion. Each individual, they held, is to be regarded by the government as having the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as any other individual. So long as he didn’t violate other people’s rights, he was free to set his own course and live on his own terms.
..... the Founders transformed the state from an instrument of oppression into an instrument of liberation: it liberated the individual so that he was free to make the most of his life."
Fee, Op. Cit.
Yet, there are still enough gullible voters who imagine that things will only be taken away from others....and given to them.
They're called Liberals.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
That's okay, we've known for a very long time that stupid people are conservative. They didn't fight for this nation when it was founded either.
People who overthrow lawful governments to achieve liberty are conservatives? No.You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.1. No ideology has ever been as good at the use of propaganda as the modern iteration of liberalism.
This is why it remains the most dynamic religion of our age.
Most important is to bear in mind that nothing could be further from the attitudes and values under which America was created, than that very ideology, Modern Liberalism.
Classical liberalism, the views if the Founders, what would be called conservatism today, is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Modern Liberalism finds at its center, material equality.
That is its fatal flaw.
2. "The division between classical and modern liberals is often represented as paralleling the tension between liberty and equality. Where classical liberalism saw individual liberty as the driving force behind peace and prosperity, the modern variety puts more emphasis on equality." Who Cares about Inequality? | Don Watkins
3. To see the roots of 'Liberalism," and its commections to material equality, know this:
"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world."
Dennis Prager
4. "The only kind of equality that is possible is also the only kind that matters: political equality. Political equality refers to equality of rights. Before the creation of the United States, every system of government had taken for granted that some people were entitled to rule others, taking away their freedom and property whenever some allegedly “greater good” demanded it.
The Founders rejected that notion. Each individual, they held, is to be regarded by the government as having the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as any other individual. So long as he didn’t violate other people’s rights, he was free to set his own course and live on his own terms.
..... the Founders transformed the state from an instrument of oppression into an instrument of liberation: it liberated the individual so that he was free to make the most of his life."
Fee, Op. Cit.
Yet, there are still enough gullible voters who imagine that things will only be taken away from others....and given to them.
They're called Liberals.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
That's okay, we've known for a very long time that stupid people are conservative. They didn't fight for this nation when it was founded either.
The Founders were classical liberals....what are known as conservatives today.
Proof?
Sure, so simple that even a simpleton like you will be able to understand the facts: America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Now....which of these is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government:
Nazism, Modern Liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism, or Progressivism?
Right....none of them.
Put you in your place, huh?
America may have had free markets before the white man came but when did America lose the free markets?You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.1. No ideology has ever been as good at the use of propaganda as the modern iteration of liberalism.
This is why it remains the most dynamic religion of our age.
Most important is to bear in mind that nothing could be further from the attitudes and values under which America was created, than that very ideology, Modern Liberalism.
Classical liberalism, the views if the Founders, what would be called conservatism today, is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Modern Liberalism finds at its center, material equality.
That is its fatal flaw.
2. "The division between classical and modern liberals is often represented as paralleling the tension between liberty and equality. Where classical liberalism saw individual liberty as the driving force behind peace and prosperity, the modern variety puts more emphasis on equality." Who Cares about Inequality? | Don Watkins
3. To see the roots of 'Liberalism," and its commections to material equality, know this:
"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world."
Dennis Prager
4. "The only kind of equality that is possible is also the only kind that matters: political equality. Political equality refers to equality of rights. Before the creation of the United States, every system of government had taken for granted that some people were entitled to rule others, taking away their freedom and property whenever some allegedly “greater good” demanded it.
The Founders rejected that notion. Each individual, they held, is to be regarded by the government as having the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as any other individual. So long as he didn’t violate other people’s rights, he was free to set his own course and live on his own terms.
..... the Founders transformed the state from an instrument of oppression into an instrument of liberation: it liberated the individual so that he was free to make the most of his life."
Fee, Op. Cit.
Yet, there are still enough gullible voters who imagine that things will only be taken away from others....and given to them.
They're called Liberals.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
That's okay, we've known for a very long time that stupid people are conservative. They didn't fight for this nation when it was founded either.
The Founders were classical liberals....what are known as conservatives today.
Proof?
Sure, so simple that even a simpleton like you will be able to understand the facts: America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Now....which of these is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government:
Nazism, Modern Liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism, or Progressivism?
Right....none of them.
Put you in your place, huh?
People who overthrow lawful governments to achieve liberty are conservatives? No.You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.1. No ideology has ever been as good at the use of propaganda as the modern iteration of liberalism.
This is why it remains the most dynamic religion of our age.
Most important is to bear in mind that nothing could be further from the attitudes and values under which America was created, than that very ideology, Modern Liberalism.
Classical liberalism, the views if the Founders, what would be called conservatism today, is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Modern Liberalism finds at its center, material equality.
That is its fatal flaw.
2. "The division between classical and modern liberals is often represented as paralleling the tension between liberty and equality. Where classical liberalism saw individual liberty as the driving force behind peace and prosperity, the modern variety puts more emphasis on equality." Who Cares about Inequality? | Don Watkins
3. To see the roots of 'Liberalism," and its commections to material equality, know this:
"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world."
Dennis Prager
4. "The only kind of equality that is possible is also the only kind that matters: political equality. Political equality refers to equality of rights. Before the creation of the United States, every system of government had taken for granted that some people were entitled to rule others, taking away their freedom and property whenever some allegedly “greater good” demanded it.
The Founders rejected that notion. Each individual, they held, is to be regarded by the government as having the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as any other individual. So long as he didn’t violate other people’s rights, he was free to set his own course and live on his own terms.
..... the Founders transformed the state from an instrument of oppression into an instrument of liberation: it liberated the individual so that he was free to make the most of his life."
Fee, Op. Cit.
Yet, there are still enough gullible voters who imagine that things will only be taken away from others....and given to them.
They're called Liberals.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
That's okay, we've known for a very long time that stupid people are conservative. They didn't fight for this nation when it was founded either.
The Founders were classical liberals....what are known as conservatives today.
Proof?
Sure, so simple that even a simpleton like you will be able to understand the facts: America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Now....which of these is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government:
Nazism, Modern Liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism, or Progressivism?
Right....none of them.
Put you in your place, huh?
People who overthrow lawful governments to achieve liberty are conservatives? No.You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
That's okay, we've known for a very long time that stupid people are conservative. They didn't fight for this nation when it was founded either.
The Founders were classical liberals....what are known as conservatives today.
Proof?
Sure, so simple that even a simpleton like you will be able to understand the facts: America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Now....which of these is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government:
Nazism, Modern Liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism, or Progressivism?
Right....none of them.
Put you in your place, huh?
Let's do it again:
....so simple that even a simpleton like you will be able to understand the facts: America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Only conservatism remains committed to the above.
Fascists, Liberals, etc support collectivism, punitive over-regulation, and unlimited central command and control governance.
Try to deny this.
[
Fascists, Liberals, etc support collectivism, punitive over-regulation, and unlimited central command and control governance.
Try to deny this.
America may have had free markets before the white man came but when did America lose the free markets?You reason like a child, no offense to children. Someone told you liberalism was bad, and you believed them.The fatal flaw of liberalism is most, like the OP, are too stupid to understand it.1. No ideology has ever been as good at the use of propaganda as the modern iteration of liberalism.
This is why it remains the most dynamic religion of our age.
Most important is to bear in mind that nothing could be further from the attitudes and values under which America was created, than that very ideology, Modern Liberalism.
Classical liberalism, the views if the Founders, what would be called conservatism today, is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Modern Liberalism finds at its center, material equality.
That is its fatal flaw.
2. "The division between classical and modern liberals is often represented as paralleling the tension between liberty and equality. Where classical liberalism saw individual liberty as the driving force behind peace and prosperity, the modern variety puts more emphasis on equality." Who Cares about Inequality? | Don Watkins
3. To see the roots of 'Liberalism," and its commections to material equality, know this:
"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world."
Dennis Prager
4. "The only kind of equality that is possible is also the only kind that matters: political equality. Political equality refers to equality of rights. Before the creation of the United States, every system of government had taken for granted that some people were entitled to rule others, taking away their freedom and property whenever some allegedly “greater good” demanded it.
The Founders rejected that notion. Each individual, they held, is to be regarded by the government as having the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as any other individual. So long as he didn’t violate other people’s rights, he was free to set his own course and live on his own terms.
..... the Founders transformed the state from an instrument of oppression into an instrument of liberation: it liberated the individual so that he was free to make the most of his life."
Fee, Op. Cit.
Yet, there are still enough gullible voters who imagine that things will only be taken away from others....and given to them.
They're called Liberals.
They were never taught to respect it, to defend it, or why it is the basis of the nation, which they would happily destroy trying to undo what holds it together, liberalism.
I'd certainly have to agree that you have some expertise on 'stupid,' having practiced it for a life time.....
But, let's prove that.
"...why it is the basis of the nation.."
Hardly.
It is the very antithesis (better look that up).
This nation was designed by the Founders to to advance individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Obamunist, Liberalism, Progressivism stands for collectivism, undue regulation, and overarching big government, ignoring the Constitution.
And that's what you vote for. You didn't know that, did you, you fool.
That's okay, we've known for a very long time that stupid people are conservative. They didn't fight for this nation when it was founded either.
The Founders were classical liberals....what are known as conservatives today.
Proof?
Sure, so simple that even a simpleton like you will be able to understand the facts: America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Now....which of these is based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government:
Nazism, Modern Liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism, or Progressivism?
Right....none of them.
Put you in your place, huh?
