Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

[Syriusly]

When did we start this revision to history. FDR won over 80% of the Jewish vote in his run for the presidency. All 4 times. Hitler tried to denounce him by portraying FDR as Jewish (much like Southern leaders tried portraying Lincoln as black).

After Pearl Harbor he doesn't bee line it for Japan but jumps to Europe to stop Hitler from overrunning Britian and Palestine, two heavily Jewish populated area's first. He put thousands of Jewish leaders in government. Helped NY's first Jewish governor win. NY's first jewish senator win. Illinois first Jewish Governor Win...

People try this revisionist history BS that he didn't let Jews in the country. Nearly a quarter of all German Jews found refuge in the US under FDR (more than any other country).

And appointed the second Jewish man to be Supreme Court Justice.

Felix Frankfurter

Henry Morgenthau was hardly FDR’s only Jewish friend and close associate. He relied on the advice and support of Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter,Samuel Rosenman, David Lilienthal, Barnard Baruch, Nathan Straus, Herbert Lehman, Benjamin Cohen and David Dubinsky;the list could go on.

As Howard Sachar writes in “A History of the Jews in America,” “Four or five thousand Jews operated at various echelons of government during the 1930s,” a complete change from the past. Roosevelt encouraged the recruitment of Jewish talent, and he was often vilified for it. I remember his being called “Roosenfelt” by the true anti-Semites of his time. No wonder Jews supported him overwhelmingly at the polls.

 

[Slash]

The fact that he resigned from the KKK doesn't help your cause one bit. The fake news will dig into the past of republicans to find something they did when they were teenagers to incriminate them. Why should anyone let these hypocrites off the hook?

All I am debunking is basic logic. Trump WAS a democrat. Now if I said "Republicans are so dumb they elected a Democrat for president", would you believe that logic? Or would you say "he's no longer a Democrat and his beliefs have changed and here's proof of that change...". Because Black voted for what was arguably the defining ruling for Civil Rights. That's NOT what the KKK does.

It's just basic logic, you can't be a member of something you resigned from.

 

[Syriusly]

FDR's troubling view of Jews

What FDR said about Jews in private
His personal sentiments about Jews may help explain America's tepid response to the Holocaust.

President Franklin Roosevelt sits at the steering wheel of his automobile… (Associated Press )

In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called "the best way to settle the Jewish question."

Vice President Henry Wallace, who noted the conversation in his diary, said Roosevelt spoke approvingly of a plan (recommended by geographer and Johns Hopkins University President Isaiah Bowman) "to spread the Jews thin all over the world." The diary entry adds: "The president said he had tried this out in [Meriwether] County, Georgia [where Roosevelt lived in the 1920s] and at Hyde Park on the basis of adding four or five Jewish families at each place. He claimed that the local population would have no objection if there were no more than that."

Roosevelt's "best way" remark is condescending and distasteful, and coming from anyone else it would probably be regarded as anti-Semitism. But more than that, FDR's support for "spreading the Jews thin" may hold the key to understanding a subject that has been at the center of controversy for decades: the American government's tepid response to the Holocaust.

Here's the paradox. The U.S. immigration system severely limited the number of German Jews admitted during the Nazi years to about 26,000 annually — but even that quota was less than 25% filled during most of the Hitler era, because the Roosevelt administration piled on so many extra requirements for would-be immigrants. For example, starting in 1941, merely leaving behind a close relative in Europe would be enough to disqualify an applicant — on the absurd assumption that the Nazis could threaten the relative and thereby force the immigrant into spying for Hitler.

Why did the administration actively seek to discourage and disqualify Jewish refugees from coming to the United States? Why didn't the president quietly tell his State Department (which administered the immigration system) to fill the quotas for Germany and Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000 lives. It would not have required a fight with Congress or the anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the president.

Every president's policy decisions are shaped by a variety of factors, some political, some personal. In Roosevelt's case, a pattern of private remarks about Jews, some of which I recently discovered at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem and from other sources, may be significant.

In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions "should be definitely limited" so as to "eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany."

. . . . . .
​

Why do you feel the need to use debunked lies to support your argument? I mean I used plain fact. Basic things that are proven. Here you have the quota (actually there was never one put on paper anywhere according to a study buy Richard Breitman and Alan J Lichtman). So why do you feel the need to keep reusing lies that have not been found to be true.

Why do you keep saying what someone says in private is more important than their actual actions they take? Did he follow through with the "lets spread them out" Idea? Of course not. Oswego and NYC became two large spots where they were allowed to choose to live together. But hey, he said "lets spread them out" so that's what matters, right? Not the reality of him choosing to do the opposite?

By your belief system, Bill Cosby could be a nice guy as long as at some point in his private life someone said he said he respects women. Then all the rapes don't matter anymore because it's right there in a diary.

In what way is "severely limiting" the Jewish Refugees actually taking in a full quarter of them. That's right, more than any other allied or neutral country by far. But because it wasn't unlimited, lets call the LARGEST intake of refugees a severe limitation right? The US has taken in about 19,000 syrian Refugees out of 5 million. FDR took in over 130,000 Jewish Refugees out of just over 500,000. I mean we've taken in less than .4% of Syrian refugees. He took in about 25% of Jewish Refugees despite his isolationist leanings.

You are saying that's proof he was a racist. Ok, what refugee crisis has the US answered better? What foreign refugee crisis did a president step up and say "we'll take more than FDR took"?? Because if the LARGEST refugee adoption in US history (though not the largest worldwide refugee crisis) was FDR taking in the jews, it's not making him look anti-semitic is it?


WHEN YOU HAVE TO CREATE OR RE-USE LIES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT IT RUINS YOUR ARGUMENT.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are listing that the US didn't accept a ship of refugees while trying to remain Neutral (neither did any other country in the America's). Where are you getting the anti-semitism of that? I mean we turn away refugees of every race and creed all the time. What makes that one anti-semitic, especially since it was done by the president who accepted more jewish refugees than any world leader ever recorded?

Fully 25% of German Jewish refugees ended up in the US. Currently we won't take more than .5% of Syrian refugees. Come on. If that's not enough, give me an example of what is in real life. If your goal is to say "FDR did more for Jewish Refugees than ANY world leader at the time, and more for refugees than ANY US president EVER has", you've made it. If that's not enough for you, then why do you feel more?

The War Refugee Board was something Roosevelt started. It was HIS executive order. He didn't oppose it. He created the thing!


On bombing the Concentration Camp rail lines, John J McCloy, the US assistant Secretary of War said that Roosevelts military leadership never even brought up the idea of that to him. Historians have said that bombing probably would have been repaired within days and caused no difference, and would have ended the food supply to concentration camps, causing mass starvation anyways. Not even Jews brought up bombing the camps until well into 1944. Are Jews anti-semitic as well? The US military leaders chose instead to end the war by focusing on military installations that would allow them to permanently shut down the concentration camps rather than reduce that effort to focus on the camps which could cause more harm than good and probably not have any lasting effect.

Really????

You're claiming that was the only thing I posted???

Lie much?


. "... Roosevelt’s embedded anti-Semitism was not confined to jokes. It was displayed in the refusal of the American government in 1939 to admit the desperate refugees on board theS.S. St. Louis,who were returned to Germany [to their deaths] – or to even fill the quotas that authorized the limited admission of Germans.

It was revealed in American government suppression of information about the mass murder of European Jews.


The White House [read 'Roosevelt'] opposed a resolution to create the War Refugee Boardand delayed its establishment for fourteen months.

Orders to bomb railroad tracks leading to the extermination camps were never given, although Nazi facilities merely five miles away were destroyed. And special American missions were launched to rescue art treasures – and performing Lipizzaner horses."
[But not Jews.]
Betrayal: FDR and the Jews



a."However, it can be argued that because of his very outspoken and domineering mother who clearly possessed a strong streak of anti-Semitism, FDR couldn't help his underlying prejudice regarding Jews. As described in an entry of January 27, 1942, Henry Morganthau Diaries, "Roosevelt proclaimed to a shocked Crowley (Catholic Economist and wartime Alien Property Custodian): Leo, you know this is a Protestant country, and the Catholics and the Jews are here on sufferance. This comment exemplifies FDR's upbringing among America's Protestant elite and how it most likely perpetuated a belief system that explains his aloofness from the crimes that were committed against Jews during the Holocaust." Roosevelt

." Why did the administration actively seek to discourage and disqualify Jewish refugees from coming to the United States? Why didn't the president quietly tell his State Department (which administered the immigration system) to fill the quotas for Germany and Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000 lives. It would not have required a fight with Congress or the anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the president."FDR's troubling view of Jews

[The Spirit of St. Louis was built in San Diego by Ryan Airlines, and while the name "Lindbergh Field" isn't official, it has stuck as a colloquial moniker. There have been some attempts to disassociate that name from the airport on the grounds that Lindbergh's antisemitism made him a terrible choice for the hero worship that naming the airport after him implies, especially because Lindbergh himself was the target of a virtual boycott after he opposed entering World War II and made disparaging remarks about Jews (even President Franklin Roosevelt claimed he could tell Lindbergh was a Nazi). Which of the following men does NOT have a chemical element named after him?]



.....rescuing Lipizzaner horses....
[But not Jews.]

Roosevelt's orders.



Soooo.....you see your role in life defending the indefensible???

Fits you.

 

[Syriusly]

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again.

I never lie..

All you do is lie.

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again

SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
"This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again.

I never lie..

All you do is lie.

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again

SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
"This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

Quoting your article:

Reporter Ray Sprigle’s investigation of Black’s links to the Klan revealed that he joined the organization in September 1923 and resigned almost two years later, in July 1925.

'resigned...in July 1925'

This Supreme Court Justice had at one time been a KKK member- as usual you are lying- FDR never appointed a KKK member to the Supreme Court.

Ready to admit you lied when you pretended that FDR didn't put a KKKer on the Supreme Court?


Confess.

I confess- you are a gullible idiot.

Justice Black was not a KKK member when he was appointed to the Supreme Court.

You know this- but you keep lying that he was.

Just more of your typical lies.

 

[Slash]

As Howard Sachar writes in “A History of the Jews in America,” “Four or five thousand Jews operated at various echelons of government during the 1930s,” a complete change from the past. Roosevelt encouraged the recruitment of Jewish talent, and he was often vilified for it. I remember his being called “Roosenfelt” by the true anti-Semites of his time. No wonder Jews supported him overwhelmingly at the polls.

Interesting. So anti-semites called him a Jew Lover. Hitler called him a Jew Lover. But instead lets revise history, burn all that history and create this new history of him being a Jew Hater. Because what someone claims he said in a diary is more important than actual history.

 

[Syriusly]

Yep- Democrats nominated and elected the first- and only African American President.

And people like you whigged out.

The Democrat Party: they were against melanin before they were for it.
.

The Democratic Party- we elect people of all colors to be President.

The GOP- we elect people who tacitly endorse white supremacists to be President

Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

LOL- still promoting that lie?

Still pissed off that America elected a Democrat- and an African American- to be President?

I'm still upset that this was put in the Oval Office:
Hussein Obama..... a dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting incompetent snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being.

LOL- poor little white supremacist- still pissed off that Americans elected a black man to be President.

'dirt eating'- prove it.
'crypto-Isamist'- prove it.
'infanticide- supporting'- prove it- (by the way- infanticide is a crime- abortion is not- if you claim abortion- well once again you will be lying)
'incompetant snake'
'failure as a human being'

Prove any of it.

I want to be amused at your lies.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR's troubling view of Jews

What FDR said about Jews in private
His personal sentiments about Jews may help explain America's tepid response to the Holocaust.

President Franklin Roosevelt sits at the steering wheel of his automobile… (Associated Press )

In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called "the best way to settle the Jewish question."

Vice President Henry Wallace, who noted the conversation in his diary, said Roosevelt spoke approvingly of a plan (recommended by geographer and Johns Hopkins University President Isaiah Bowman) "to spread the Jews thin all over the world." The diary entry adds: "The president said he had tried this out in [Meriwether] County, Georgia [where Roosevelt lived in the 1920s] and at Hyde Park on the basis of adding four or five Jewish families at each place. He claimed that the local population would have no objection if there were no more than that."

Roosevelt's "best way" remark is condescending and distasteful, and coming from anyone else it would probably be regarded as anti-Semitism. But more than that, FDR's support for "spreading the Jews thin" may hold the key to understanding a subject that has been at the center of controversy for decades: the American government's tepid response to the Holocaust.

Here's the paradox. The U.S. immigration system severely limited the number of German Jews admitted during the Nazi years to about 26,000 annually — but even that quota was less than 25% filled during most of the Hitler era, because the Roosevelt administration piled on so many extra requirements for would-be immigrants. For example, starting in 1941, merely leaving behind a close relative in Europe would be enough to disqualify an applicant — on the absurd assumption that the Nazis could threaten the relative and thereby force the immigrant into spying for Hitler.

Why did the administration actively seek to discourage and disqualify Jewish refugees from coming to the United States? Why didn't the president quietly tell his State Department (which administered the immigration system) to fill the quotas for Germany and Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000 lives. It would not have required a fight with Congress or the anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the president.

Every president's policy decisions are shaped by a variety of factors, some political, some personal. In Roosevelt's case, a pattern of private remarks about Jews, some of which I recently discovered at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem and from other sources, may be significant.

In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions "should be definitely limited" so as to "eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany."

. . . . . .
​

Why do you feel the need to use debunked lies to support your argument? I mean I used plain fact. Basic things that are proven. Here you have the quota (actually there was never one put on paper anywhere according to a study buy Richard Breitman and Alan J Lichtman). So why do you feel the need to keep reusing lies that have not been found to be true.

Why do you keep saying what someone says in private is more important than their actual actions they take? Did he follow through with the "lets spread them out" Idea? Of course not. Oswego and NYC became two large spots where they were allowed to choose to live together. But hey, he said "lets spread them out" so that's what matters, right? Not the reality of him choosing to do the opposite?

By your belief system, Bill Cosby could be a nice guy as long as at some point in his private life someone said he said he respects women. Then all the rapes don't matter anymore because it's right there in a diary.

In what way is "severely limiting" the Jewish Refugees actually taking in a full quarter of them. That's right, more than any other allied or neutral country by far. But because it wasn't unlimited, lets call the LARGEST intake of refugees a severe limitation right? The US has taken in about 19,000 syrian Refugees out of 5 million. FDR took in over 130,000 Jewish Refugees out of just over 500,000. I mean we've taken in less than .4% of Syrian refugees. He took in about 25% of Jewish Refugees despite his isolationist leanings.

You are saying that's proof he was a racist. Ok, what refugee crisis has the US answered better? What foreign refugee crisis did a president step up and say "we'll take more than FDR took"?? Because if the LARGEST refugee adoption in US history (though not the largest worldwide refugee crisis) was FDR taking in the jews, it's not making him look anti-semitic is it?


WHEN YOU HAVE TO CREATE OR RE-USE LIES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT IT RUINS YOUR ARGUMENT.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

 

[Syriusly]

As Howard Sachar writes in “A History of the Jews in America,” “Four or five thousand Jews operated at various echelons of government during the 1930s,” a complete change from the past. Roosevelt encouraged the recruitment of Jewish talent, and he was often vilified for it. I remember his being called “Roosenfelt” by the true anti-Semites of his time. No wonder Jews supported him overwhelmingly at the polls.

Interesting. So anti-semites called him a Jew Lover. Hitler called him a Jew Lover. But instead lets revise history, burn all that history and create this new history of him being a Jew Hater. Because what someone claims he said in a diary is more important than actual history.

Well you have to understand- PC has a big hard on about Roosevelt and starts at least a thread a week on the same inane crap about Roosevelt.

She just can't stand that Roosevelt led America to victory in World War 2, and was not only one of our most popular Presidents- elected 4 times- each time with a majority of Jewish votes- but is considered by historians to be one of our greatest Presidents.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I never lie..

All you do is lie.

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again

SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
"This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

I never lie..

All you do is lie.

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again

SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
"This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

Quoting your article:

Reporter Ray Sprigle’s investigation of Black’s links to the Klan revealed that he joined the organization in September 1923 and resigned almost two years later, in July 1925.

'resigned...in July 1925'

This Supreme Court Justice had at one time been a KKK member- as usual you are lying- FDR never appointed a KKK member to the Supreme Court.

Ready to admit you lied when you pretended that FDR didn't put a KKKer on the Supreme Court?


Confess.

I confess- you are a gullible idiot.

Justice Black was not a KKK member when he was appointed to the Supreme Court.

You know this- but you keep lying that he was.

Just more of your typical lies.

From the Smithsonian:

"SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member"

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



That's right, you low-life lying gutter snipe....

FDR made a KKKer his first nominee to the Supreme Court.

That's a fact.

 

[Syriusly]

FDR's troubling view of Jews

What FDR said about Jews in private
His personal sentiments about Jews may help explain America's tepid response to the Holocaust.

President Franklin Roosevelt sits at the steering wheel of his automobile… (Associated Press )

In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called "the best way to settle the Jewish question."

Vice President Henry Wallace, who noted the conversation in his diary, said Roosevelt spoke approvingly of a plan (recommended by geographer and Johns Hopkins University President Isaiah Bowman) "to spread the Jews thin all over the world." The diary entry adds: "The president said he had tried this out in [Meriwether] County, Georgia [where Roosevelt lived in the 1920s] and at Hyde Park on the basis of adding four or five Jewish families at each place. He claimed that the local population would have no objection if there were no more than that."

Roosevelt's "best way" remark is condescending and distasteful, and coming from anyone else it would probably be regarded as anti-Semitism. But more than that, FDR's support for "spreading the Jews thin" may hold the key to understanding a subject that has been at the center of controversy for decades: the American government's tepid response to the Holocaust.

Here's the paradox. The U.S. immigration system severely limited the number of German Jews admitted during the Nazi years to about 26,000 annually — but even that quota was less than 25% filled during most of the Hitler era, because the Roosevelt administration piled on so many extra requirements for would-be immigrants. For example, starting in 1941, merely leaving behind a close relative in Europe would be enough to disqualify an applicant — on the absurd assumption that the Nazis could threaten the relative and thereby force the immigrant into spying for Hitler.

Why did the administration actively seek to discourage and disqualify Jewish refugees from coming to the United States? Why didn't the president quietly tell his State Department (which administered the immigration system) to fill the quotas for Germany and Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000 lives. It would not have required a fight with Congress or the anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the president.

Every president's policy decisions are shaped by a variety of factors, some political, some personal. In Roosevelt's case, a pattern of private remarks about Jews, some of which I recently discovered at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem and from other sources, may be significant.

In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions "should be definitely limited" so as to "eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany."

. . . . . .
​

Why do you feel the need to use debunked lies to support your argument? I mean I used plain fact. Basic things that are proven. Here you have the quota (actually there was never one put on paper anywhere according to a study buy Richard Breitman and Alan J Lichtman). So why do you feel the need to keep reusing lies that have not been found to be true.

Why do you keep saying what someone says in private is more important than their actual actions they take? Did he follow through with the "lets spread them out" Idea? Of course not. Oswego and NYC became two large spots where they were allowed to choose to live together. But hey, he said "lets spread them out" so that's what matters, right? Not the reality of him choosing to do the opposite?

By your belief system, Bill Cosby could be a nice guy as long as at some point in his private life someone said he said he respects women. Then all the rapes don't matter anymore because it's right there in a diary.

In what way is "severely limiting" the Jewish Refugees actually taking in a full quarter of them. That's right, more than any other allied or neutral country by far. But because it wasn't unlimited, lets call the LARGEST intake of refugees a severe limitation right? The US has taken in about 19,000 syrian Refugees out of 5 million. FDR took in over 130,000 Jewish Refugees out of just over 500,000. I mean we've taken in less than .4% of Syrian refugees. He took in about 25% of Jewish Refugees despite his isolationist leanings.

You are saying that's proof he was a racist. Ok, what refugee crisis has the US answered better? What foreign refugee crisis did a president step up and say "we'll take more than FDR took"?? Because if the LARGEST refugee adoption in US history (though not the largest worldwide refugee crisis) was FDR taking in the jews, it's not making him look anti-semitic is it?


WHEN YOU HAVE TO CREATE OR RE-USE LIES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT IT RUINS YOUR ARGUMENT.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....'

Point out the '7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human beings in this photo:

 

[Syriusly]

All you do is lie.

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again

SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
"This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

All you do is lie.

Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again

SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
"This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



Ready to admit you lied about FDR nominating a KKKer to the Supreme Court?

Quoting your article:

Reporter Ray Sprigle’s investigation of Black’s links to the Klan revealed that he joined the organization in September 1923 and resigned almost two years later, in July 1925.

'resigned...in July 1925'

This Supreme Court Justice had at one time been a KKK member- as usual you are lying- FDR never appointed a KKK member to the Supreme Court.

Ready to admit you lied when you pretended that FDR didn't put a KKKer on the Supreme Court?


Confess.

I confess- you are a gullible idiot.

Justice Black was not a KKK member when he was appointed to the Supreme Court.

You know this- but you keep lying that he was.

Just more of your typical lies.

From the Smithsonian:

"SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member"

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



That's right, you low-life lying gutter snipe....

FDR made a KKKer his first nominee to the Supreme Court.

That's a fact.

Nope- just you lying again.
Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again.

But FDR did appoint the second Jewish Supreme Court Justice- and yes- he was actually Jewish when he was appointed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As Howard Sachar writes in “A History of the Jews in America,” “Four or five thousand Jews operated at various echelons of government during the 1930s,” a complete change from the past. Roosevelt encouraged the recruitment of Jewish talent, and he was often vilified for it. I remember his being called “Roosenfelt” by the true anti-Semites of his time. No wonder Jews supported him overwhelmingly at the polls.

Interesting. So anti-semites called him a Jew Lover. Hitler called him a Jew Lover. But instead lets revise history, burn all that history and create this new history of him being a Jew Hater. Because what someone claims he said in a diary is more important than actual history.

FDR and Hitler, two socialists, were on excellent terms, you dope.

It was not until FDR to choose between Hitler and Stalin that he ended his relationship with the former, and latched on to his first love.


" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48



Have you ever picked up a book that didn't require Crayons?????

 

[bripat9643]

The fact that he resigned from the KKK doesn't help your cause one bit. The fake news will dig into the past of republicans to find something they did when they were teenagers to incriminate them. Why should anyone let these hypocrites off the hook?

All I am debunking is basic logic. Trump WAS a democrat. Now if I said "Republicans are so dumb they elected a Democrat for president", would you believe that logic? Or would you say "he's no longer a Democrat and his beliefs have changed and here's proof of that change...". Because Black voted for what was arguably the defining ruling for Civil Rights. That's NOT what the KKK does.

It's just basic logic, you can't be a member of something you resigned from.

If Trump was formerly a member of the Nazi party would you be saying the same thing?

We all know you wouldn't, which is why your posts simply aren't credible.

 

[Slash]

From the Smithsonian:

"SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member"

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



That's right, you low-life lying gutter snipe....

FDR made a KKKer his first nominee to the Supreme Court.

That's a fact.

Was being the operative word there. NO ONE is arguing with you that he used to be in the KKK, and that was found out and made public after he was appointed.

Just like "Donald Trump was a Democrat".

 

[PoliticalChic]

As Howard Sachar writes in “A History of the Jews in America,” “Four or five thousand Jews operated at various echelons of government during the 1930s,” a complete change from the past. Roosevelt encouraged the recruitment of Jewish talent, and he was often vilified for it. I remember his being called “Roosenfelt” by the true anti-Semites of his time. No wonder Jews supported him overwhelmingly at the polls.

Interesting. So anti-semites called him a Jew Lover. Hitler called him a Jew Lover. But instead lets revise history, burn all that history and create this new history of him being a Jew Hater. Because what someone claims he said in a diary is more important than actual history.

"As a member of the Harvard board of directors he supported a Jewish admissions quota."

Soooooo.....Franklin Roosevelt felt it was necessary to keep Jewish folk out of the Ivy Leagues because he love them??????


If we put a lens in each of your ears we'd have a telescope.

 

[bripat9643]

FDR's troubling view of Jews

What FDR said about Jews in private
His personal sentiments about Jews may help explain America's tepid response to the Holocaust.

President Franklin Roosevelt sits at the steering wheel of his automobile… (Associated Press )

In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called "the best way to settle the Jewish question."

Vice President Henry Wallace, who noted the conversation in his diary, said Roosevelt spoke approvingly of a plan (recommended by geographer and Johns Hopkins University President Isaiah Bowman) "to spread the Jews thin all over the world." The diary entry adds: "The president said he had tried this out in [Meriwether] County, Georgia [where Roosevelt lived in the 1920s] and at Hyde Park on the basis of adding four or five Jewish families at each place. He claimed that the local population would have no objection if there were no more than that."

Roosevelt's "best way" remark is condescending and distasteful, and coming from anyone else it would probably be regarded as anti-Semitism. But more than that, FDR's support for "spreading the Jews thin" may hold the key to understanding a subject that has been at the center of controversy for decades: the American government's tepid response to the Holocaust.

Here's the paradox. The U.S. immigration system severely limited the number of German Jews admitted during the Nazi years to about 26,000 annually — but even that quota was less than 25% filled during most of the Hitler era, because the Roosevelt administration piled on so many extra requirements for would-be immigrants. For example, starting in 1941, merely leaving behind a close relative in Europe would be enough to disqualify an applicant — on the absurd assumption that the Nazis could threaten the relative and thereby force the immigrant into spying for Hitler.

Why did the administration actively seek to discourage and disqualify Jewish refugees from coming to the United States? Why didn't the president quietly tell his State Department (which administered the immigration system) to fill the quotas for Germany and Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000 lives. It would not have required a fight with Congress or the anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the president.

Every president's policy decisions are shaped by a variety of factors, some political, some personal. In Roosevelt's case, a pattern of private remarks about Jews, some of which I recently discovered at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem and from other sources, may be significant.

In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions "should be definitely limited" so as to "eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany."

. . . . . .
​

Why do you feel the need to use debunked lies to support your argument? I mean I used plain fact. Basic things that are proven. Here you have the quota (actually there was never one put on paper anywhere according to a study buy Richard Breitman and Alan J Lichtman). So why do you feel the need to keep reusing lies that have not been found to be true.

Why do you keep saying what someone says in private is more important than their actual actions they take? Did he follow through with the "lets spread them out" Idea? Of course not. Oswego and NYC became two large spots where they were allowed to choose to live together. But hey, he said "lets spread them out" so that's what matters, right? Not the reality of him choosing to do the opposite?

By your belief system, Bill Cosby could be a nice guy as long as at some point in his private life someone said he said he respects women. Then all the rapes don't matter anymore because it's right there in a diary.

In what way is "severely limiting" the Jewish Refugees actually taking in a full quarter of them. That's right, more than any other allied or neutral country by far. But because it wasn't unlimited, lets call the LARGEST intake of refugees a severe limitation right? The US has taken in about 19,000 syrian Refugees out of 5 million. FDR took in over 130,000 Jewish Refugees out of just over 500,000. I mean we've taken in less than .4% of Syrian refugees. He took in about 25% of Jewish Refugees despite his isolationist leanings.

You are saying that's proof he was a racist. Ok, what refugee crisis has the US answered better? What foreign refugee crisis did a president step up and say "we'll take more than FDR took"?? Because if the LARGEST refugee adoption in US history (though not the largest worldwide refugee crisis) was FDR taking in the jews, it's not making him look anti-semitic is it?


WHEN YOU HAVE TO CREATE OR RE-USE LIES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT IT RUINS YOUR ARGUMENT.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

Muslims are vicious uncivilized bloodthirsty savages. Discriminating against them is common sense, just as discriminating against the importation of poisonous snakes is common sense.

 

[Slash]

If Trump was formerly a member of the Nazi party would you be saying the same thing?

We all know you wouldn't, which is why your posts simply aren't credible.

Yes I would actually. If someone came up with a piece of paper of him being a former member of the Nazi Party. He WAS a former member and no I wouldn't say that 50% of America voted in a Nazi. Especially when that information came out AFTER the voting took place.

This has nothing to do with politics. Everything to do with basic understanding of the English Language.

I'd be PISSED that I voted for him. But that doesn't mean I am a nazi lover.

 

[bripat9643]

If Trump was formerly a member of the Nazi party would you be saying the same thing?

We all know you wouldn't, which is why your posts simply aren't credible.

Yes I would actually. If someone came up with a piece of paper of him being a former member of the Nazi Party. He WAS a former member and no I wouldn't say that 50% of America voted in a Nazi. Especially when that information came out AFTER the voting took place.

This has nothing to do with politics. Everything to do with basic understanding of the English Language.

I'd be PISSED that I voted for him. But that doesn't mean I am a nazi lover.

Liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As Howard Sachar writes in “A History of the Jews in America,” “Four or five thousand Jews operated at various echelons of government during the 1930s,” a complete change from the past. Roosevelt encouraged the recruitment of Jewish talent, and he was often vilified for it. I remember his being called “Roosenfelt” by the true anti-Semites of his time. No wonder Jews supported him overwhelmingly at the polls.

Interesting. So anti-semites called him a Jew Lover. Hitler called him a Jew Lover. But instead lets revise history, burn all that history and create this new history of him being a Jew Hater. Because what someone claims he said in a diary is more important than actual history.

Well you have to understand- PC has a big hard on about Roosevelt and starts at least a thread a week on the same inane crap about Roosevelt.

She just can't stand that Roosevelt led America to victory in World War 2, and was not only one of our most popular Presidents- elected 4 times- each time with a majority of Jewish votes- but is considered by historians to be one of our greatest Presidents.

"...Roosevelt led America to victory in World War 2,..."

1. Roosevelt turned over management of Allied war efforts to Stalin.
Stalin got to choose the attack via Normandy, rather than through Italy, so that the Red Army could occupy Eastern Europe.

2. Because he allowed Stalin to make the military diecisions, FDR extended the war by years, and cost thousands of American lives.