Liberals, if Trump sold uranium to Russia and Ivanka was paid $500K by Russians for a speech...

[K9Buck]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I say youre a fucking moron.

/---/ Why won't you answer his perfectly legitimate question? Eh Spanky?

The question isn't legitimate since Instance A never happened, and Instance B isn't comparable since Bill wasn't a member of the administration when he made the speech.

If you want to talk about pay for play, let's talk about those 10 trademarks the Chinese government gave the Trumps as a "gift" right after the inauguration.

Hillary never engaged in "pay for play"?

 

[K9Buck]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

Hillary didn't sell uranium to Russia. She to do with the approval of that deal. Her Department was one of 9 which reviewed it and approved it but Hillary wasn't even involved in the process.

Why do you continue to lie about this?

Hillary didn't have to sign off on it too?

 

[francoHFW]

Alan Dershowitz: 'I don't see any crime' that Donald Trump Jr. committed

Dershowitz has been a guest at Mar-a-lago, making him a PAID spokesman.

What does that have to do with the validity of his statement?

How is he wrong with regards to the law, specifically?

Let's wait and find out what the investigation finds for crying out loud LOL.

Whoever broke the law should be punished. You'll never hear a liberal say such a thing. Their outrage and desire for justice is wholly contingent upon whether the accused has an "R" or a "D" by their name.

There is no such law, super dupe

 

[K9Buck]

Alan Dershowitz: 'I don't see any crime' that Donald Trump Jr. committed

Dershowitz has been a guest at Mar-a-lago, making him a PAID spokesman.

What does that have to do with the validity of his statement?

How is he wrong with regards to the law, specifically?

Let's wait and find out what the investigation finds for crying out loud LOL.

Whoever broke the law should be punished. You'll never hear a liberal say such a thing. Their outrage and desire for justice is wholly contingent upon whether the accused has an "R" or a "D" by their name.

There is no such law, super dupe

Going full k*nt mode, eh? Typical, dishonest, liberal tactic.

 

[francoHFW]

Dershowitz has been a guest at Mar-a-lago, making him a PAID spokesman.

What does that have to do with the validity of his statement?

How is he wrong with regards to the law, specifically?

Let's wait and find out what the investigation finds for crying out loud LOL.

Whoever broke the law should be punished. You'll never hear a liberal say such a thing. Their outrage and desire for justice is wholly contingent upon whether the accused has an "R" or a "D" by their name.

There is no such law, super dupe

Going full k*nt mode, eh? Typical, dishonest, liberal tactic.

Now Jared Kushner is using a private email server for government business LOL. There was no law against it would Hillary was using hers...

 

[K9Buck]

What does that have to do with the validity of his statement?

How is he wrong with regards to the law, specifically?

Let's wait and find out what the investigation finds for crying out loud LOL.

Whoever broke the law should be punished. You'll never hear a liberal say such a thing. Their outrage and desire for justice is wholly contingent upon whether the accused has an "R" or a "D" by their name.

There is no such law, super dupe

Going full k*nt mode, eh? Typical, dishonest, liberal tactic.

Now Jared Kushner is using a private email server for government business LOL. There was no law against it would Hillary was using hers...

Can you form a coherent sentence?

 

[francoHFW]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I say youre a fucking moron.

/---/ Why won't you answer his perfectly legitimate question? Eh Spanky?

The question isn't legitimate since Instance A never happened, and Instance B isn't comparable since Bill wasn't a member of the administration when he made the speech.

If you want to talk about pay for play, let's talk about those 10 trademarks the Chinese government gave the Trumps as a "gift" right after the inauguration.

Hillary never engaged in "pay for play"?

not according to several government investigations

 

[francoHFW]

Let's wait and find out what the investigation finds for crying out loud LOL.

Whoever broke the law should be punished. You'll never hear a liberal say such a thing. Their outrage and desire for justice is wholly contingent upon whether the accused has an "R" or a "D" by their name.

There is no such law, super dupe

Going full k*nt mode, eh? Typical, dishonest, liberal tactic.

Now Jared Kushner is using a private email server for government business LOL. There was no law against it would Hillary was using hers...

Can you form a coherent sentence?

Damn smart phone. There was no law when Hillary did it. You don't have to act like a total hater dupe, vulgar hater dupe

 

[francoHFW]

LOL

 

[deanrd]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I say youre a fucking moron.

How dare you.

That's an insult to morons everywhere!

 

[K9Buck]

Whoever broke the law should be punished. You'll never hear a liberal say such a thing. Their outrage and desire for justice is wholly contingent upon whether the accused has an "R" or a "D" by their name.

There is no such law, super dupe

Going full k*nt mode, eh? Typical, dishonest, liberal tactic.

Now Jared Kushner is using a private email server for government business LOL. There was no law against it would Hillary was using hers...

Can you form a coherent sentence?

Damn smart phone. There was no law when Hillary did it. You don't have to act like a total hater dupe, vulgar hater dupe

I'm not a hater. You attacked me first, remember?

You're saying it was LEGAL for Hillary to conduct official government business on a private server and to transmit classified material through it. Is that what you're saying?

 

[K9Buck]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I say youre a fucking moron.

How dare you.

That's an insult to morons everywhere!

Hey, another liberal k*nt showed up who's afraid to answer simple questions.

 

[deanrd]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I say youre a fucking moron.

How dare you.

That's an insult to morons everywhere!

Hey, another liberal k*nt showed up who's afraid to answer simple questions.

Simple questions from simpletons already have answers. They are never new and never clever.

 

[K9Buck]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I say youre a fucking moron.

How dare you.

That's an insult to morons everywhere!

Hey, another liberal k*nt showed up who's afraid to answer simple questions.

Simple questions from simpletons already have answers. They are never new and never clever.

The clear answer is that you support one set of standards for Republicans and a different set for Democrats, which is, no standards, anything goes.

 

[AntonToo]

...what would you say about that? Would you be saying it was "pay for play"? Would you say it was "corrupt"? Would you say it was collusion between the Russian government and a president that was willing to sell out his country for profit?

I would say you don't know what the F you are talking about.

Hillary didn't sell anything to Russia, all she did was approve a private deal as a head of DoS, along with 8 other agencies, as not a security threat.

She or her family did NOT make speeches at those companies.

 

[BlindBoo]

Depends on where the Uranium came from. By law the mines located in the US cannot export uranium because our mines can only produce about 20% of our uranium needs. If President "Grabass" owned some mines in Uzbekistan I suppose he could sell to Russia.

The Hillary sold Russia our uranium is a fake story. One the rube are continuously feed and continuously parrot.

Pizza anyone?

 

[Camp]

Depends on where the Uranium came from. By law the mines located in the US cannot export uranium because our mines can only produce about 20% of our uranium needs. If President "Grabass" owned some mines in Uzbekistan I suppose he could sell to Russia.

The Hillary sold Russia our uranium is a fake story. One the rube are continuously feed and continuously parrot.

Pizza anyone?

The Uranium fake story is the lie told over and over and the hater rubes have been suckered into believing it.

 

[francoHFW]

You said Obama went after political opponents illegally. The only one accusing him of that is Trump.

Incorrect. The Washington Post used the word "improperly" but the word "illegally" would also be valid.

IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, confirming long-standing accusations by some conservatives that their applications for tax-exempt status were being improperly delayed and scrutinized.

That was just the Cincinnati office trying to keep up with the huge back up of tea party organizations... Totally innocent they were all approved etc etc etc, dupe.