hahahaha, explain the difference for us then. libertarian is libertarian.
Every time I make the mistake of responding to you, I'm reminded of the trial scene from Idiocracy:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hahahaha, explain the difference for us then. libertarian is libertarian.
Just like the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. They MUST have democratically controlled elections to choose their representatives, right? And the 'workers' party represents the workers....backed up by Dblack, post #70, so you're out of line.
"More of European socialist libertarian, fwiw."
I assume he knows all that and is just playing the demagogue. But maybe not. Maybe he's as stupid as he seems.Just like the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. They MUST have democratically controlled elections to choose their representatives, right? And the 'workers' party represents the workers....
And it would not matter anyway, he directly refutes the contention that the OP demands he makes.
Don't get so flustered.You understand nothing.....Best STFU and look the fool, than open your yap and remove all doubt, sock-o.
I'm not flustered and you still know fucking nothing.....You don't need to keep blabbering on to prove it, sock-o.Don't get so flustered.
I merely note that I trust women to make sound personal decisions for themselves in consultation with any loved ones and spiritual and medical advisers they trust over bureaucrats and politicians intruding and imposing their impersonal demands upon them.
If you prefer the statist approach, that is your right.
I have no clue how Korea keeps their republic, we aren't a democratic country is that is what you wish to imply, but we are a federal republic and a representative democracy. Does that exist in NK? I do understand that you want xiden to be authoritarian as Kim Jun I get it.Just like the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. They MUST have democratically controlled elections to choose their representatives, right? And the 'workers' party represents the workers....
And it would not matter anyway, he directly refutes the contention that the OP demands he makes.
Hence the ever growing need for boostersthe Covid-19 vaccine. It is highly effective in reducing transmission,
Is that true, dblack?
Of course not. Uncensored is just mad because I won't climb aboard the Trump crazy train.Is that true, dblack?
Do you believe that libertarian ideals are closely related to Marxist ideals? Are you a Chomskite?
There are those who claim that Marxist totalitarianism is a form of Libertarianism, some here on USMB. I guess the twisted logic is that Marxism frees people from freedom and creates an Orwellian "Slavery is Freedom" dichotomy.
The root of this nonsense comes from radical Marxist Noam Chomsky. Chomsky is a linguist who rose to prominence by building a cult following to his brand of Stalinism, which some, including Lew Rockwell decided was "libertarian." Rockwell gave Chomsky a platform among legitimate libertarian thought.
Yesterday, Chomsky once again showed his contempt for liberty and individualism with this statement;
{
“People who refuse to accept vaccines, I think the right response for them is not to force them to, but rather to insist that they be isolated. If people decide, ‘I am willing to be a danger to the community by refusing to vaccinate,’ they should say then, ‘Well, I also have the decency to isolate myself. I don’t want a vaccine, but I don’t have the right to run around harming people.’ That should be a convention,” said Chomsky.
“Enforcing is a different question. It should be understood, and we should try to get it to be understood. If it really reaches the point where they are severely endangering people, then of course you have to do something about it,”}
Noam Chomsky says the unvaccinated should just remove themselves from society
'How can we get food to them?' asks Chomsky. 'Well, that's actually their problem'nationalpost.com
I disagree.That would be "immoral"...."Amoral" means that you don't hold any judgement on anyone's non-aggressive behavior.
Demoncrats are among the most moralizing people around, and use their perverted notions of "morality" to force others to bend the knee to their endless demands.
Those faux "libertarians" regularly get called out for the frauds that they are.Most so called libertarians on this forum are the biggest statist authoritatian boot lickers on here. You know who I'm talking about.
There is a good distinction that’s already been made on this board by another poster. A person can self-identify as anything they want in today’s world with at least 300,000 people backing it. So there is sometimes a stark difference between what people say they are and the definition. In the case of defining, libertarian has several definitions because of political differences. Example: right-leaning and left-leaning liberations have polar opinions with respect to citizen drug use. It gets a little strange (imo) when you learn you are mostly right-leaning, however, you support decriminalizing marijuana but still classified as a right leaning libertarian. IOW, fine details are still eluded by any effort to group label. Individuals will remain individuals at least for the next 20 years.No libertarian supports Govt mandated shots or any sort of gun control.
Many libertarians fell for the lesser-of-two-evils conceit and now support Trump. They know they've abandoned their previous principles, and it gnaws at them, so they attack anyone who reminds them of that fact.There is a good distinction that’s already been made on this board by another poster. A person can self-identify as anything they want in today’s world with at least 300,000 people backing it. So there is sometimes a stark difference between what people say they are and the definition. In the case of defining, libertarian has several definitions because of political differences. Example: right-leaning and left-leaning liberations have polar opinions with respect to citizen drug use. It gets a little strange (imo) when you learn you are mostly right-leaning, however, you support decriminalizing marijuana but still classified as a right leaning libertarian. IOW, fine details are still eluded by any effort to group label. Individuals will remain individuals at least for the next 20 years.
Do you really believe that? They are allowing their daughters to get raped in bathrooms by their other children they allow to be transgendered.Don't get so flustered.
I merely note that I trust women to make sound personal decisions for themselves in consultation with any loved ones and spiritual and medical advisers they trust over bureaucrats and politicians intruding and imposing their impersonal demands upon them.
If you prefer the statist approach, that is your right.
But it doesn't seen to gnaw at you for sucking DNC and corporate media dick.Many libertarians fell for the lesser-of-two-evils conceit and now support Trump. They know they've abandoned their previous principles, and it gnaws at them, so they attack anyone who reminds them of that fact.
what policy of trump's was crazy to you?Of course not. Uncensored is just mad because I won't climb aboard the Trump crazy train.
For example.But it doesn't seen to gnaw at you for sucking DNC and corporate media dick.