Limited IDF Withdrawal from Gaza?

[Phoenall]

The pallys are obscene and should be destroyed to the very last.

Absolutely! Extermination! Steal their land and then slaughter them. That's the Christian way to look at it. It's God's will for his chosen people.

No mention of stealing their land is there, until you brought it up. Just showing them that what they say to do to others can be done to them just as easily.

 

[Phoenall]

Murdering Arabs and their children for land and water is obscene.
End the occupation of Palestine.

To hell with them and you. End the Cease Fires and destroy the Hamas Dogs and take the dang place.

End it by FORCE.

What are you going to do with the 1.8 million Arabs living there?
Israel pulled its military and settlers out of Gaza in 2005 because its economy couldn't bear the cost of paying for a full-fledged West Bank style occupation.
In spite of everything Jews have done since 1948 to cleanse Palestine of its Arabs, there are nearly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs living there today.
More killing probably won't work.

The Israelis abided by the Oslo accords and that is why they gave up gaza, and the Palestinians showed yet again that they cant be trusted to stick to agreements. The 1.8 million arabs can go back to were they came from and leave the true gazan inhabitants to live in peace. Just as more rockets fired at Israel wont work either, they will just involve a disproportionate number of ISLAMONAZI deaths. Then one day the people will realise that hamas has been feeding them a line all these years.

 

[Phoenall]

Posing that child is obscene.

Too fucking bad. You won't find that on CNN, the Commie News Network.

Here's another by the same photographer:

She's a 30 year-old warrior who's been covering Gaza for the last five years:

"For Gazan freelance photographer Samar Abu Elouf, the grief of Operation Protective Edge is nothing new. The 30-year-old has been photographing Palestinian life and death in Gaza for five years, including Israel's last incursion during 2012's Operation Pillar of Defense.

"She says the child in the photo above, taken Monday, was named Shaima, after her 23-year-old mother.

'A baby with that name, born under the circumstances Abu Elouf describes, reportedly died on Wednesday.

"Like many images released from the region, Abu Elouf's work is part documentary, part politics, focusing exclusively on destruction caused by the Israeli operation. Frequently, her subjects are children and youths, many of whom, she adds, have lost parents or relatives in the conflict and have 'extreme fear' in their eyes."

The Heartbreaking Image of a Newborn in Gaza -- NYMag

Newborns die all the time and it is just natures way of saying this child was flawed. The rate of newborn fatalities is higher in Islamic culture because of the close inbreeding that causes defective children. So start placing the blame for this one death were it belongs on the heads of the childs parents. Then look to all the other deaths with an open mind and see who is to blame for them.

 

[Phoenall]

What are you going to do with the 1.8 million Arabs living there?
Israel pulled its military and settlers out of Gaza in 2005 because its economy couldn't bear the cost of paying for a full-fledged West Bank style occupation.
In spite of everything Jews have done since 1948 to cleanse Palestine of its Arabs, there are nearly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs living there today.
More killing probably won't work.

Martial Law.................Peace with a dang Boot on the neck.

Like a Warsaw ghetto. Lovely.

NO like an ISLAMONAZI state that forbids everything

 

[Phoenall]

Murdering Arabs and their children for land and water is obscene.
End the occupation of Palestine.

I notice you use the word murder when talking about Palestinians killed in war.

So my question for you is: when there is a war between two or more belligerents, and civilians are killed on both sides, are those civilians always considered 'murder victims'?

Are you talking about two sovereign states, each with their own army, navy, air force?
Or are you talking about Israel's occupation of Gaza?
Israel v Gaza is not a war.
It's how Jews expect to gain all the land between the River and the sea.
And you know it.

According to the ruling group in gaza Israel has not occupied it since August 2005. And the ruling group in gaza has a standing army of terrorists, militants and militia. If it is not a war then why did the Palestinians declare it as such in 1948, and never rescinded it.

Strange how history and the evidence shows that Israel has given up much more land than it has retained in the area between the sea and the river. So your ISLAMONAZI BLOOD LIBEL is destroyed

 

[Phoenall]

I don't know if the IDF has that kind of manpower.
They're using thousands of reserves in Gaza right now.
Those people can't be kept on active duty indefinitely.
The action you're describing would not go unnoticed in other Arab states.
Things might heat up in Lebanon and Syria with new Arab alliances forming.
Hezbollah and IS, for example.
It makes more sense to me to put peacekeepers in Palestine for the next generation or two.

Holy cow! You just shot yourself in the foot.
Israel of 2014, with over 4 million Jews and over 500K troops DOESN'T HAVE THE MANPOWER TO MOVE 1.2 million Arabs?

Then how the Hell did 700K Jews, with FAR FEWER troops move 1.2 million Arabs in 1948?

Holy cow!

Arabs trusted their Jewish neighbors enough to give them the keys to their homes and businesses in '48.

Arabs aren't running anymore.

And the Jews have no where to move 3.5 to 4 million Arabs today.

Do you think the world will tolerate genocide on that scale today?(outside the US)

You can of course produce a link from a non partisan source that shows the arabs gave the Jews the keys to their property. Or is this just another of your LIES

 

[toastman]

Murdering Arabs and their children for land and water is obscene.
End the occupation of Palestine.

I notice you use the word murder when talking about Palestinians killed in war.

So my question for you is: when there is a war between two or more belligerents, and civilians are killed on both sides, are those civilians always considered 'murder victims'?

Are you talking about two sovereign states, each with their own army, navy, air force?
Or are you talking about Israel's occupation of Gaza?
Israel v Gaza is not a war.
It's how Jews expect to gain all the land between the River and the sea.
And you know it.

Enough with the damn conspiracies. Israels incursion into Gaza is about destroying Hamas tunnels and making it harder or even impossible to launch rockets.

And it's not Israel vs. Gaza. It's Israel vs. Hamas.
Now answer the question

 

[georgephillip]

You don't get it do you? Hamas does not care about their children. Why do you suppose they are hanging them on a building in the middle of a war zone?

Where's your proof that was Hamas?
Even if it was, they wouldn't need human shields if Israel wasn't occupying Palestine.

Maybe if the Palestinians had not decided that war, violence and bloodshed were the way to go then Israel would not need to occupy the west bank. Giving in to Palestinian demands does not work either as shown by gaza in August 2005 when the rockets increased in numbers because the gazans saw Israel as weak.

As they say pay back is a bitch

The Big Bitch in Palestine has a name spelled J-E-W
Sound like anyone you know?

"Collective punishment is a form of retaliation whereby a suspected perpetrator's family members, friends, acquaintances, sect, neighbours or entire ethnic group is targeted.

"The punished group may often have no direct association with the other individuals or groups, or direct control over their actions. In times of war and armed conflict, collective punishment has resulted in atrocities, and is a violation of the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions.

"Historically, occupying powers have used collective punishment to retaliate against and deter attacks on their forces by resistance movements (e.g. destroying entire towns and villages where such attacks have occurred)."

Collective punishment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[georgephillip]

I notice you use the word murder when talking about Palestinians killed in war.

So my question for you is: when there is a war between two or more belligerents, and civilians are killed on both sides, are those civilians always considered 'murder victims'?

Are you talking about two sovereign states, each with their own army, navy, air force?
Or are you talking about Israel's occupation of Gaza?
Israel v Gaza is not a war.
It's how Jews expect to gain all the land between the River and the sea.
And you know it.

Enough with the damn conspiracies. Israels incursion into Gaza is about destroying Hamas tunnels and making it harder or even impossible to launch rockets.

And it's not Israel vs. Gaza. It's Israel vs. Hamas.
Now answer the question

It's Israel wanting all the land between the River and the sea for Jews ONLY.
When Jews stop being greedy, peace will bloom in Palestine.

 

[Indeependent]

Are you talking about two sovereign states, each with their own army, navy, air force?
Or are you talking about Israel's occupation of Gaza?
Israel v Gaza is not a war.
It's how Jews expect to gain all the land between the River and the sea.
And you know it.

Enough with the damn conspiracies. Israels incursion into Gaza is about destroying Hamas tunnels and making it harder or even impossible to launch rockets.

And it's not Israel vs. Gaza. It's Israel vs. Hamas.
Now answer the question

It's Israel wanting all the land between the River and the sea for Jews ONLY.
When Jews stop being greedy, peace will bloom in Palestine.

You mean peace like in Syria occupied Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Turkey?
You get dumber by the post.
Not that you ever post anything original.

 

[georgephillip]

Too fucking bad. You won't find that on CNN, the Commie News Network.

Here's another by the same photographer:

She's a 30 year-old warrior who's been covering Gaza for the last five years:

"For Gazan freelance photographer Samar Abu Elouf, the grief of Operation Protective Edge is nothing new. The 30-year-old has been photographing Palestinian life and death in Gaza for five years, including Israel's last incursion during 2012's Operation Pillar of Defense.

"She says the child in the photo above, taken Monday, was named Shaima, after her 23-year-old mother.

'A baby with that name, born under the circumstances Abu Elouf describes, reportedly died on Wednesday.

"Like many images released from the region, Abu Elouf's work is part documentary, part politics, focusing exclusively on destruction caused by the Israeli operation. Frequently, her subjects are children and youths, many of whom, she adds, have lost parents or relatives in the conflict and have 'extreme fear' in their eyes."

The Heartbreaking Image of a Newborn in Gaza -- NYMag

Newborns die all the time and it is just natures way of saying this child was flawed. The rate of newborn fatalities is higher in Islamic culture because of the close inbreeding that causes defective children. So start placing the blame for this one death were it belongs on the heads of the childs parents. Then look to all the other deaths with an open mind and see who is to blame for them.

This particular newborn died because some psychotic Jew blasted a rocket through the maternity ward her mother was sleeping in; just nature's way of saying some people are "chosen." Place the blame on the greedy Semites who believe all the land between the River and the sea belongs to them. Hasbara? Open minds??

 

[georgephillip]

Enough with the damn conspiracies. Israels incursion into Gaza is about destroying Hamas tunnels and making it harder or even impossible to launch rockets.

And it's not Israel vs. Gaza. It's Israel vs. Hamas.
Now answer the question

It's Israel wanting all the land between the River and the sea for Jews ONLY.
When Jews stop being greedy, peace will bloom in Palestine.

You mean peace like in Syria occupied Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Turkey?
You get dumber by the post.
Not that you ever post anything original.

How could any American post what you've just posted with a straight face?

"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat.

"'Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said.'

"'But there was more.'

"'This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World.

Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Indeependent]

It's Israel wanting all the land between the River and the sea for Jews ONLY.
When Jews stop being greedy, peace will bloom in Palestine.

You mean peace like in Syria occupied Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Turkey?
You get dumber by the post.
Not that you ever post anything original.

How could any American post what you've just posted with a straight face?

"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat.

"'Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said.'

"'But there was more.'

"'This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World.

Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try to focus:
When Muslims aren't murdering their neighboring Muslims, they're murdering each other.
I know that fact causes you pain.
But...what the fuck!

 

[dilloduck]

You mean peace like in Syria occupied Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Turkey?
You get dumber by the post.
Not that you ever post anything original.

How could any American post what you've just posted with a straight face?

"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat.

"'Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said.'

"'But there was more.'

"'This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World.

Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try to focus:
When Muslims aren't murdering their neighboring Muslims, they're murdering each other.
I know that fact causes you pain.
But...what the fuck!

No----it's all the more reason for Israel to drive them far far away instead of allowing them to be close enough to tunnel under their borders.

 

[georgephillip]

You mean peace like in Syria occupied Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Turkey?
You get dumber by the post.
Not that you ever post anything original.

How could any American post what you've just posted with a straight face?

"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat.

"'Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said.'

"'But there was more.'

"'This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World.

Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try to focus:
When Muslims aren't murdering their neighboring Muslims, they're murdering each other.
I know that fact causes you pain.
But...what the fuck!

The US has maimed, murdered, displaced, and incarcerated millions of innocent Muslims in their own countries since 911.

Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were not bombing each other's markets and mosques before the US invasion.

The biggest problem Muslim in the ME have is greedy westerners trying to control their oil and gas deposits.

 

[Indeependent]

How could any American post what you've just posted with a straight face?

"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat.

"'Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said.'

"'But there was more.'

"'This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World.

Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try to focus:
When Muslims aren't murdering their neighboring Muslims, they're murdering each other.
I know that fact causes you pain.
But...what the fuck!

Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were not bombing each other's markets and mosques before the US invasion.

Are you an idiot!?
Foolish question on my part; of course you are.
Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were ruled by a murderous dictator!

 

[georgephillip]

Try to focus:
When Muslims aren't murdering their neighboring Muslims, they're murdering each other.
I know that fact causes you pain.
But...what the fuck!

Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were not bombing each other's markets and mosques before the US invasion.

Are you an idiot!?
Foolish question on my part; of course you are.
Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were ruled by a murderous dictator!

A murderous dictator?
Really?
Which country installed the dictator's party in Iraq?
The same one propping up Israel's occupation of Palestine?

 

[Indeependent]

Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were not bombing each other's markets and mosques before the US invasion.

Are you an idiot!?
Foolish question on my part; of course you are.
Sunni and Shi'ia in Iraq were ruled by a murderous dictator!

A murderous dictator?
Really?
Which country installed the dictator's party in Iraq?
The same one propping up Israel's occupation of Palestine?

Which just goes to how gullible Muslims are.

 

[georgephillip]

Gaza live! on USTREAM: Livestream Gaza! Please consider donating to keep this channel online, spread the word and stop war! I am a dedicated freelance jo...

 

[aris2chat]

Here's another by the same photographer:

She's a 30 year-old warrior who's been covering Gaza for the last five years:

"For Gazan freelance photographer Samar Abu Elouf, the grief of Operation Protective Edge is nothing new. The 30-year-old has been photographing Palestinian life and death in Gaza for five years, including Israel's last incursion during 2012's Operation Pillar of Defense.

"She says the child in the photo above, taken Monday, was named Shaima, after her 23-year-old mother.

'A baby with that name, born under the circumstances Abu Elouf describes, reportedly died on Wednesday.

"Like many images released from the region, Abu Elouf's work is part documentary, part politics, focusing exclusively on destruction caused by the Israeli operation. Frequently, her subjects are children and youths, many of whom, she adds, have lost parents or relatives in the conflict and have 'extreme fear' in their eyes."

The Heartbreaking Image of a Newborn in Gaza -- NYMag

Newborns die all the time and it is just natures way of saying this child was flawed. The rate of newborn fatalities is higher in Islamic culture because of the close inbreeding that causes defective children. So start placing the blame for this one death were it belongs on the heads of the childs parents. Then look to all the other deaths with an open mind and see who is to blame for them.

This particular newborn died because some psychotic Jew blasted a rocket through the maternity ward her mother was sleeping in; just nature's way of saying some people are "chosen." Place the blame on the greedy Semites who believe all the land between the River and the sea belongs to them. Hasbara? Open minds??

>>Shayma al-Sheikh Qanan, was killed after an airstrike had hit her house in the central Gaza town of Deir al-Balah<<.

Baby was delivered by C-section after the mother had been dead for more than ten minutes. Baby Shayma lived on life support for five days.

Taking a preemie outside to be photographed like that was criminal.