Lol, OK fort. Let me just say it for you ok?:think so? You think it would have been better for them, had they been on the committee? How so? I don't. The facts would have been just as real and just as damning, despite your fantasy to the contrary. The didn't screw the pooch. As your postings show, their tactic was very, very effective.
I mean, they got some Joe Q from Anytown, USA (you) bending over backwards to cover for them and to make preemptive excuses for discounting the findings of the existing committee.
That is GREAT success, by any measure. Propaganda doesn't get any more successful than that.
"I believe the committee is 100% honorable, and of the utmost integrity. I believe that they cannot and will not lie, ever, and they will present their findings in complete fairness and utter objectivity. I further attest they will not hide any facts that could be favorable to Trump and they will present any evidence in the correct context always and without a bias agenda. I also attest that each member of the committee is completely unbiased and without preconceived ideas, and are only looking for the truth, even if that truth is that they cannot find any credible evidence that links Trump to the planning and launching of the attack on the capitol. Further, each of the members have not divulged any previous notion of guilt and they have only the interest of finding the facts and they are not running the investigation with any intent on trying to find a guilty outcome."
So, did I get it right? Did I represent your position correctly?