Liz Cheney: we might subpoena Ginni Thomas if she doesn't speak with Jan 6 committee voluntarily...Adam Schiff agrees

Liz Cheney Makes It Clear That The 1/6 Committee Is Coming For Ginni Thomas


This traitorous bitch is going away very soon... I am going to proudly vote for someone else who believes in the rule of law and our constitution. Cheney suborned perjury, denies due process, and is a traitor to the United States Constitution. This is the kind of swamp creature that needs to be removed permanently from congress or any position of power.
 
I suppose when the Chair is sick with covid the kids come. out to play

the Chair already made clear that after a year a half they were not making any criminal referrals there just isn’t any there there

and thus they are having these public “show trials” of selected edits and rumors
 
OMG, Please DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO it................lets bring spouses of politicians and judges into the political arena........I really really really want this to happen......Come on Liz and Schiff........open that Pandora's box.....Puleeeeeeeeeeeeze
 
The sooner Cheney gets thrashed in November the better...and she's going to
“The committee has asked Thomas, a conservative activist, to meet with the panel and provide documents that could be relevant to the investigation. The committee has email correspondence between Thomas and former President Donald Trump’s election attorney John Eastman, as well as texts between her and Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. The texts show Thomas urging Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Eastman and Meadows have also been subjects of the committee’s investigation.”


Thomas was communicating with Trump co-conspirators in support of Trump’s coup attempt to overturn a fair, honest, and lawful election and install Trump as autocrat and dictator.

Seeking her testimony is perfectly appropriate and warranted, as would be subjecting her to a subpoena.
 
“The committee has asked Thomas, a conservative activist, to meet with the panel and provide documents that could be relevant to the investigation. The committee has email correspondence between Thomas and former President Donald Trump’s election attorney John Eastman, as well as texts between her and Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. The texts show Thomas urging Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Eastman and Meadows have also been subjects of the committee’s investigation.”


Thomas was communicating with Trump co-conspirators in support of Trump’s coup attempt to overturn a fair, honest, and lawful election and install Trump as autocrat and dictator.

Seeking her testimony is perfectly appropriate and warranted, as would be subjecting her to a subpoena.
I am looking forward to Eastman public hearing
 
At least the Italian-American mafia leaves family members out of the attacks.
Unless those family members are ALSO conspiring to overturn a lawful election and to subvert the Constitution in support of Insurrectionists.

At which point, the gloves come off.

It is ALSO a means to discover if Justice Thomas is ALSO complicit with the January 6, 2021 Insurrection, in some way.

In such a case, removal from the Supreme Court would be indicated.


No one is above The Law.
 
“The committee has asked Thomas, a conservative activist, to meet with the panel and provide documents that could be relevant to the investigation. The committee has email correspondence between Thomas and former President Donald Trump’s election attorney John Eastman, as well as texts between her and Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. The texts show Thomas urging Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Eastman and Meadows have also been subjects of the committee’s investigation.”


Thomas was communicating with Trump co-conspirators in support of Trump’s coup attempt to overturn a fair, honest, and lawful election and install Trump as autocrat and dictator.

Seeking her testimony is perfectly appropriate and warranted, as would be subjecting her to a subpoena.

Cease bothering me, Jones

You run off everytime you get smoked and everybody knows it. Worthless jackass
 
So let's review:

- In no way can anyone POSSIBLY imply or suggest that a spouse may influence a judge

- the family members of judges are off limits

Pick a lane, dummies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top