Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA

abu afak

ALLAH SNACKBAR!
Mar 3, 2006
7,215
2,564
315
Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


January 18, 2018

Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]​
 
Last edited:
Bwhaaaaaaaaaaa

Not this crap again.... Your gods adjusted up several areas that were cooling again.... Funny how that happens in ares where there is no ground based checks available to show your lies..
 
Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 was one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


January 18, 2018

Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]​


I don't care. The sooner man destroys his climate, the sooner he wipes himself out unable to adapt and the sooner he gives the planet back to the innocent animals that the Earth will quickly recover for.
 
Bwhaaaaaaaaaaa

Not this crap again.... Your gods adjusted up several areas that were cooling again.... Funny how that happens in ares where there is no ground based checks available to show your lies..

Not this crap that comes from scientific data. Better to have good stuff that some dude made up with money from oil companies.

You'll note that you didn't actually provide an argument. Just a bullshit "fake news".
 
Bwhaaaaaaaaaaa

Not this crap again.... Your gods adjusted up several areas that were cooling again.... Funny how that happens in ares where there is no ground based checks available to show your lies..

Not this crap that comes from scientific data. Better to have good stuff that some dude made up with money from oil companies.

You'll note that you didn't actually provide an argument. Just a bullshit "fake news".





I would love to see their raw data. Not the computer derived fiction they shovel to you mushrooms.
 
As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.


14th February, 2010


Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!

There has been no global warming since 1995

Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes

Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.
[WHAT????]


[…]

Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.




Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.


Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.


We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.


Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Daily Mail Online
 
I would love to see their raw data.
As though you would be able to apply proper corrections. As though Muller at Home - Berkeley Earth didn't have the same curiosity and did something about it, then reinforced the scientific consensus. As though you can't access their source data at Source Files - Berkeley Earth.

But I suppose Muller does fake science too. Oh well.




"Corrections" There are several reasons that are legit for corrections. Can you name them?
 
As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.


14th February, 2010


Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!

There has been no global warming since 1995

Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes

Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.
[WHAT????]


[…]

Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.




Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.


Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.


We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.


Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Daily Mail Online
Geeezzzz, these disproved lies again, fabricated to give cover to deniers Spencer and Christy at UAH getting caught actually cooking the data to turn global warming into cooling.
 
That's the new ruse....go back to the 1800's to make your data fit the established narrative. Soon we'll see warming "trends" the go back to the 18th century! Rare to see '95-'18 graphs in here anymore.:gay:

I wonder if some of these climate crusader bozos even recognize the fakery with the presentation of the statistics? Any graph can be made to look impressive depending on how much you fuck with each axis.....assholes!:cul2::hhello::hhello:
 
I would love to see their raw data.
As though you would be able to apply proper corrections. As though Muller at Home - Berkeley Earth didn't have the same curiosity and did something about it, then reinforced the scientific consensus. As though you can't access their source data at Source Files - Berkeley Earth.

But I suppose Muller does fake science too. Oh well.
ALL the Warming deniers waste Thousands of posts each year but intentionally/delusionally miss the big picture.
It's like the 9/11 Truthers with their "details":
"WTC fell "too fast" (or "too slow")
"The hole was too small for a plane to make"
"It was a demolition"
"It was an inside job"

Same tactics here.
`
 
Last edited:
The short term trend is warming and then a very long pause...the long term trend is cooling. Learn something thunder.
 
Geeezzzz, these disproved lies again, fabricated to give cover to deniers Spencer and Christy at UAH getting caught actually cooking the data to turn global warming into cooling.

As you know, NO LIES, direct from the head of the source for Global Warming figures.
 
The short term trend is warming and then a very long pause...the long term trend is cooling. Learn something thunder.
There hasn't been a real cooling trend for 100 years, some flat trends, but no true cooling trend.
 

Forum List

Back
Top