🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Look what I found

Petitions are useless but I signed it

The kid feared for his safety...acted in self defense.

Leave him alone
Even if the petition goes nowhere, reading it will remind people of the unethical behavior of the DAs, and hopefully, they will remember to watch their own DAs, and vote them out if they get up to any shit.
 
Petitions are useless but I signed it

The kid feared for his safety...acted in self defense.

Leave him alone
Even if the petition goes nowhere, reading it will remind people of the unethical behavior of the DAs, and hopefully, they will remember to watch their own DAs, and vote them out if they get up to any shit.

I won't argue that.

This kid is being railroaded by assholes trying to appease the real tormentors.

I know I won't be in Wisconsin anytime soon
 
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone.
Done. In Rittenhouse's case at least. What are you really whining about?
The biased and unethical behavior of many prosecutors.


(You got a comprehension issue or something? Or are you just an asshole? Because everyone else seemed to understand)
 
All of the historical revision and denial in the world isn't going to change the violent past that your party has to wear around their necks, like a stinking dead albatross. Maybe that's why you're so eager to hide your despicable past by tearing down the statues you Democrats erected in the first place.

That's quite a burden of guilt you're forced to carry around on your shoulders. No wonder you people are so unhinged and unstable.
Are you saying it wasn't whites who committed this heinous crimes? Who's revising history here? Me or you?

I'm not white. It's only mobs of white thugs calling themselves the KKK who went around lynching innocent black people for merely being black.

There was a whole Civil Rights Movement that resulted from this.

As a black person, I'm not on the wrong side of history, or anything here, only you as a white supremacist is.

Facts!
 
You Democrats seem to have an affinity for lynching, don't you?

Even now, like you did back then.
Racist whites love lynching. As they did then, they do now.

All of the historical revision and denial in the world isn't going to change the violent past that your party has to wear around their necks, like a stinking dead albatross. Maybe that's why you're so eager to hide your despicable past by tearing down the statues you Democrats erected in the first place.

That's quite a burden of guilt you're forced to carry around on your shoulders. No wonder you people are so unhinged and unstable.
To be fair, they weren't given any structure on which to bear that burden...... their families are broken and scattered, their education was deliberately trash to make them malleable and unable to think clearly and logically, and they were kept away from the churches, so they have zero spiritual development. It's no wonder they're crazy and feral.
They're one step up from Orcs, FFS....
 
All of the historical revision and denial in the world isn't going to change the violent past that your party has to wear around their necks, like a stinking dead albatross. Maybe that's why you're so eager to hide your despicable past by tearing down the statues you Democrats erected in the first place.

That's quite a burden of guilt you're forced to carry around on your shoulders. No wonder you people are so unhinged and unstable.
Are you saying it wasn't whites who committed this heinous crimes? Who's revising history here? Me or you?

I'm not white. It's only mobs of white thugs calling themselves the KKK who went around lynching innocent black people for merely being black.

There was a whole Civil Rights Movement that resulted from this.

As a black person, I'm not on the wrong side of history, or anything here, only you as a white supremacist is.

Facts!

You're not white, and yet your eagerly carry water for and do the bidding of the same party who started a civil war, lynched thousands of people of your same race, prevented them from voting, denied them their civil rights and shuffled them off to big urban ghettos where they'd be out of sight.

Can you say "Uncle Tom"? How about "Step-n-fetchit"? You're truly a disgrace to your own race, man.
 
Last edited:
All of the historical revision and denial in the world isn't going to change the violent past that your party has to wear around their necks, like a stinking dead albatross. Maybe that's why you're so eager to hide your despicable past by tearing down the statues you Democrats erected in the first place.

That's quite a burden of guilt you're forced to carry around on your shoulders. No wonder you people are so unhinged and unstable.
Are you saying it wasn't whites who committed this heinous crimes? Who's revising history here? Me or you?

I'm not white. It's only mobs of white thugs calling themselves the KKK who went around lynching innocent black people for merely being black.

There was a whole Civil Rights Movement that resulted from this.

As a black person, I'm not on the wrong side of history, or anything here, only you as a white supremacist is.

Facts!
You do see the similarities in the way the prosecutors are favoring one side here and in other riot torn cities right?
Kind of the same shit that was going on 50, 60 years ago where one group would be given a pass legally, to terrorize another group, that would be aggressively prosecuted whenever and wherever possible. This sort of lawfare looks pretty familiar to me, I've read enough history to have heard of exactly this before....... how about you?

It was wrong then, but now that the colors of the folks are reversed for the most part, you're okay with it all of a sudden?
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
His rights haven't been denied at all.

He was charged with a crime. He will have a lawyer appointed. He will have a trial where he has to prove he acted in self defense.

The fact is he was breaking WI gun laws so can one claim self defense while committing a crime?
Wrong.

He was 17 and open carrying a rifle in WI


WI gun laws clearly state one must be 18 to legally open carry
lol like Democrats really and BLM hood rats give a shit about laws. Turning their cities into free fire zones and standing down their police pretty much invalidates 'state laws' by the govt.s own actions.
Irrelevant.

You are calling a person who broke the law a "hero" when he was just another law breaker on the streets

You're just another liar. Your pet thugs and cop killer wannabees are scum, period, and so is anybody who defends them and their hate crimes.
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
His rights haven't been denied at all.

He was charged with a crime. He will have a lawyer appointed. He will have a trial where he has to prove he acted in self defense.

The fact is he was breaking WI gun laws so can one claim self defense while committing a crime?

LOL...he'll have a lawyer appointed?
He has lawyers falling all over themselves to defend him for free,and some very notable one's at that.
So like i said his rights have not been violated

I dont see how they can charge him with murder given the video evidence.
Dont know if they did that to calm the rioters or if there's a more nefarious reason.

they want to legalize any crimes committed by violent racist black hood rats and make it illegal for whites to defend themselves from the low life vermin. That's is what it's about, legalizing looting and hate crimes committed by Blues Man's heroes.
 
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone.
Done. In Rittenhouse's case at least. What are you really whining about?
The instigator isn’t in custody
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
His rights haven't been denied at all.

He was charged with a crime. He will have a lawyer appointed. He will have a trial where he has to prove he acted in self defense.

The fact is he was breaking WI gun laws so can one claim self defense while committing a crime?

LOL...he'll have a lawyer appointed?
He has lawyers falling all over themselves to defend him for free,and some very notable one's at that.
So like i said his rights have not been violated

I dont see how they can charge him with murder given the video evidence.
Dont know if they did that to calm the rioters or if there's a more nefarious reason.

they want to legalize any crimes committed by violent racist black hood rats and make it illegal for whites to defend themselves from the low life vermin. That's is what it's about, legalizing looting and hate crimes committed by Blues Man's heroes.
Reparations
 
All of the historical revision and denial in the world isn't going to change the violent past that your party has to wear around their necks, like a stinking dead albatross. Maybe that's why you're so eager to hide your despicable past by tearing down the statues you Democrats erected in the first place.

That's quite a burden of guilt you're forced to carry around on your shoulders. No wonder you people are so unhinged and unstable.
Are you saying it wasn't whites who committed this heinous crimes? Who's revising history here? Me or you?

I'm not white. It's only mobs of white thugs calling themselves the KKK who went around lynching innocent black people for merely being black.

There was a whole Civil Rights Movement that resulted from this.

As a black person, I'm not on the wrong side of history, or anything here, only you as a white supremacist is.

Facts!
You voted with the same party of the kkk lol blacks overwhelmingly voted with the Democratic Party during the years of the KKK lynching Lol
 
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone.
Done. In Rittenhouse's case at least. What are you really whining about?
The biased and unethical behavior of many prosecutors.


(You got a comprehension issue or something? Or are you just an asshole? Because everyone else seemed to understand)
You portray this Rittenhouse as or equivalent to one of those "leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone." He came over from a different State to illegally intimidate protesters with an assault rifle and wound up killing some. Don't do the crime if you don't want the time. Those who actually care about this country appear to understand just fine.
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
If he shot someone wearing a Trump hat they would have bought him a cup of coffee.
 
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone.
Done. In Rittenhouse's case at least. What are you really whining about?
The biased and unethical behavior of many prosecutors.


(You got a comprehension issue or something? Or are you just an asshole? Because everyone else seemed to understand)
You portray this Rittenhouse as or equivalent to one of those "leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone." He came over from a different State to illegally intimidate protesters with an assault rifle and wound up killing some. Don't do the crime if you don't want the time. Those who actually care about this country appear to understand just fine.
To keep the problem from coming to your home you have to stop it at the other's guys home.
 
Cool. Same logic as the Saudi's on 9/11. Seems to work for those privileged enough.
 
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone.
Done. In Rittenhouse's case at least. What are you really whining about?
The biased and unethical behavior of many prosecutors.


(You got a comprehension issue or something? Or are you just an asshole? Because everyone else seemed to understand)
You portray this Rittenhouse as or equivalent to one of those "leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone." He came over from a different State to illegally intimidate protesters with an assault rifle and wound up killing some. Don't do the crime if you don't want the time. Those who actually care about this country appear to understand just fine.
No he didn't.

And you know it, and you are deliberately lying about it.





You should be ashamed of yourself, but I'm betting you're just going to double-down on your shitty behavior.
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
If he shot someone wearing a Trump hat they would have bought him a cup of coffee.
Murder is murder
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
If he shot someone wearing a Trump hat they would have bought him a cup of coffee.
Murder is murder
And destroying people's livelihood is...?
 

Forum List

Back
Top