Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,564
- 74,003
- 3,645
Todd, if you don't know the basic information of this topic, you should not be commenting on it.They wanted to have a conversation with him about violating the Logan Act?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Todd, if you don't know the basic information of this topic, you should not be commenting on it.They wanted to have a conversation with him about violating the Logan Act?
Unauthorized? So what did he negotiate?
It was simply what they do, to everyone they are about to interview....is what the couple of chosen notes appeared to show.... I would need to see all the notes before coming to the conclusions you all on the right wing have been primed to come to by your media.
Right. They investigate criminals and trap them in their own lies. Thank goodness.If this is "what they do" in general --
Oh look, lard ass finally chimed in with the height of his abilities to contribute....It's not as hard as you may think, I've trapped you in countless lies.Right. They investigate criminals and trap them in their own lies. Thank goodness.If this is "what they do" in general --
Right. They investigate criminals and trap them in their own lies. Thank goodness.If this is "what they do" in general --
That's a lie. You are a shameless liar. And all for Dear Leader.And THEY CONCLUDED "he did not LIE to them"...
That's a lie. You are a shameless liar. And all for Dear Leader.And THEY CONCLUDED "he did not LIE to them"...
Fact is, he did lie. That's a fact. And you are not going to slither and whine your way around it.
But he did lie, so who cares? And thank you for confirming your lie. What they said was that it did not seem like he was lying, while he was talking. They did not conclude that he didn't lie. See if you can spot the difference an save yourself from further embarrassment.hat ya want to bet on the existence of an FBI 302 report of their meeting at the WH that SAYS -- they didn't think that Flynn lied to them?
But he did lie, so who cares? And thank you for confirming your lie.
I know you are . You lied and then confirmed that you were lying. The lying foreign agent was back door dealing with russians to give them their spyhouses back, and he lied to the FBI about it. The fact that a foreign agent was even in the position Flynn was would be the scandal of the term, for anyone other than the mentally ill president.Twisting in the wind here
But he did. The evidence shows it. And he swore to the crime while under oath in a court of law. So there you have it.If he didn't LIE to the agents -
False. It was not legal for them to engage in diplomacy.He was part of the fucking transition team and one of Trumps National Security Advisors, of course he is going to talk to Russian Diplomats.
Wrong. Try looking up the facts before you make a bigger fool of yourself.
"The Logan Act is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized American citizens with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. "False. It was not legal for them to engage in diplomacy.He was part of the fucking transition team and one of Trumps National Security Advisors, of course he is going to talk to Russian Diplomats.
Wrong. Try looking up the facts before you make a bigger fool of yourself.
Has been determined to be non Constitutional, and has not been used in 150 years, and the idea that the incoming Nat Sec Adviser is a private citizen is fucking laughable. Go home child.
The FBI agents did conclude that he didn’t lie. That’s a false and misleading statement.That's a lie. You are a shameless liar. And all for Dear Leader.And THEY CONCLUDED "he did not LIE to them"...
Fact is, he did lie. That's a fact. And you are not going to slither and whine your way around it.
What ya want to bet on the existence of an FBI 302 report of their meeting at the WH that SAYS -- they didn't think that Flynn lied to them? I WANT something here for curing your ignorance and badgering me for lying...
Otherwise as the Dos Equis guy says -- "Stay IGNORANT my friend"....
I’ve heard that narrative but I haven’t seen facts to back that up. Flynn lied and got fired by Trump that’s not in dispute right. The FBI were investigating collusion with a Russia and were questioning a guy who had lied about his contacts. Why is that inappropriate?I'd have to go look, but I do recall that Flynn had been bankrupted because of the lawyers he needed after the second run at him by the FBI commenced. They were looking into his son too, but I don't recall the reasons.What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.Because that isn't what happened.Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.
Why is this an issue?
The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.
Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.
Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.
What isn't controversial about it.
Had Flynn not lied to the FBI there would be nothing to squeeze, right?I think the issue is that the FBI squeezed him for dirt on Trump and Russia. And at the time the FBI did that, it had to know there was no actual evidence of a Trump-Putin conspiracy.Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.
Why is this an issue?
And that IS NOT TO DAY THE FBI DIDN'T HAVE REASON TO INITIATE AN INVESTIGATION. Trump told his boychinkins to meet with a known Russian spy to get dirt of Hillary. And Trump publicly asked Putin to hack and publish Hillary's emails. No presidential candidate since Nixon has come close to that brazen misbehavior.
But I agree that in the end, all Flynn did was illegally represent foreign entities, and he did so while working for the US govt (US). He needed to give the money up, and take his legal hit.
/——/ Forbes any better? You know you could do your own Googling: Will Michael Flynn Plead Guilty And Cooperate To Protect His Son?/----/ Try listening to the news once in a while.What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.Because that isn't what happened.Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.
Why is this an issue?
The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.
Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.
Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.
What isn't controversial about it.
We're the FBI - tell us what we want to hear, confess to whatever crime we say OR we will go after your son, and destroy him like we did you.
![]()
Gen. Flynn Signed Guilty Plea After Mueller Threatened His Family, Son; Thug Tactics Coerced Plea Deal – True Pundit
Gen. Michael Flynn didn’t cut a deal with U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller because he was necessarily guilty of lying to the FBI, or any crimes, according to sources close to the retired general. Flynn was muscled and coerced into a plea deal, several sources said. Flynn plead guilty after...truepundit.com
TruePundit? LoLoLoL!! The number one website linked by Russian trolls in 2016!
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
- Overall, we rate True Pundit not only Questionable, but also a far right conspiracy site that rarely publishes credible news. This is a far right conspiracy source that cannot be trusted for accurate news reporting.