Looks Like the Trump Admin is Bringing Dark Secrets to The Light

[Faun]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

No it doesn't Coyote.
Justice was served today.

No, I totally disagree with that. Barr has stepped in/over his lawyers too many times for me to believe that. Flynn lied, there is no doubt, the judge has been clear on that as well.

Justice would have been served IN A COURT - cleared by a court. But Barr has shown himself to be a political creature from the start when he misportrayed the Mueller report, refused to release it, etc. Too many things. This is the real swamp.

I'm not quite sure how a prosecutor can drop charges on an adjudicated case?

 

[Coyote]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

No it doesn't Coyote.
Justice was served today.

No, I totally disagree with that. Barr has stepped in/over his lawyers too many times for me to believe that. Flynn lied, there is no doubt, the judge has been clear on that as well.

Justice would have been served IN A COURT - cleared by a court. But Barr has shown himself to be a political creature from the start when he misportrayed the Mueller report, refused to release it, etc. Too many things. This is the real swamp.

I know you disagree, I've read your prior posts, but, that doesn't mean your right, or even come close to being right.
When the facts are taken with context in the Flynn case, it's an easy call. Not the one sided half truths that
your tribe laid out and ignored the context.

That's all I'm going to say, you're a good person and I'm not going to mix it up with you.

Meister, it doesn't mean you are right or close to right either. We stand far apart on this...but that's ok.

Thanks for the last comment, I appreciate it

 

[Coyote]

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

Sure thing Let's pretend the previous administration was not invested
in overthrowing the legally elected president of the United States. And then let's further pretend
some horrible crime has been committed when things are set straight.

You folks really are a brain damaged bunch of children.

Let's pretend we will actually stick to FACTS and not conspiracy theories for a change.

 

[Coyote]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

No it doesn't Coyote.
Justice was served today.

No, I totally disagree with that. Barr has stepped in/over his lawyers too many times for me to believe that. Flynn lied, there is no doubt, the judge has been clear on that as well.

Justice would have been served IN A COURT - cleared by a court. But Barr has shown himself to be a political creature from the start when he misportrayed the Mueller report, refused to release it, etc. Too many things. This is the real swamp.

I'm not quite sure how a prosecutor can drop charges on an adjudicated case?

He pled guilty twice...but one of the prosecutors quit the case shortly before this was announced. I can see why.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

,lk

These turds can’t form an honest argument. The IG did find many issues with the way the investigation was conducted yet they still need to lie and distort what is valid criticism. That’s pathetic

And frustrating. They are turning valid criticisms into grist to fuel their huge, multifaceted conspiracy theory of a coup. You can’t argue conspiracy theories, logic has no place there, it becomes an exercise in frustation. That is what I found with birthers.

And you willfully ignore the political classes own statements where 19 minutes after inauguration they were already plotting on how to remove him.

Like I said Coyote, look in the mirror.

I did. And I found this.

The Party of No: New Details on the GOP Plot to Obstruct Obama | TIME.com

TIME just published “The Party of No,” an article adapted from my new book, The New New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change in the Obama Era. It reveals some of my reporting on the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whi...

swampland.time.com

Do you not understand that there is a HUGE gulf between obstructing a president, and trying to ILLEGALLY remove one from office? C'mon Coyote. You are not dumb. You are smart, but there is NO equivalency here. One groups actions were LEGAL. The other groups actions, were not.

Do you have a link for that - illegally trying to remove him from office? The only thing I can find is that a CA Dem candidate started a super pac called "Impeach Trump".

BEFORE Trump was elected the FBI was spying on his campaign. ILLEGALLY. You tell me.

Actually, according to Horowitz's report it wasn't illegal, there was sufficient reason for it.

Are you saying that is the basis of the claim that the Dems were plotting to remove Trump?

There was? What, prey tell. The ILLEGALLY obtained steele dossier? Get real.

There was nothing illegal about how the dossier was obtained. Also, it wasn't the only evidence backing up the investigation. So ya, I believe Horowitz, unlike either of us he would have seen all the information.

But back to the question - you said that the Dems were plotting to overthrow Trump before his inauguration - what is that based on?

Yes, there was. The hillary campaign PAID a foreign agent (that's the illegal part) to obtain information to affect the outcome of the election.

No they didn't - they hired and paid Fusion GPS, an American company.

Who acted as a cut out for steele. Just like they hid the payments to steele by filtering(laundering) the payments through their law firm.

The whole thing was dirty which is why they tried like hell to hide everything.

Bullshit. You possess a grand total of zero evidence that Hillary or the DNS were involved with Steele.

They hired an American-based firm. Period.

That is a fucking laughable claim.

Grow up clown boi.

LOLOL

Your surrender is accepted. Of course, I already knew you were shooting blanks since there is no evidence Hillary or the DNC were involved with hiring Steele.

You lose again because you're a loser.

If foreign help was illegal, why didn't Fusion GPS know that?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Let's pretend we will actually stick to FACTS and not conspiracy theories for a change.

I've begged you and your little helpers to look at the evidence included in the Dore/ Mate' video
but you just couldn't be bothered.

Well now I couldn't care less. Just like Trump was railroaded over Russia and Ukraine so Flynn has been
the victim of scumbags like James Comey and Peter Strzok. Here's something for you to consider:

Top Michael Flynn prosecutor moves to withdraw from case

Van Grack has been accused by Flynn's attorneys and conservative media of prosecutorial misconduct.

www.axios.com

Lead prosecutor in the Flynn case resigned abruptly-things weren't going well.

What Barr did is moot as far as I can see. Flynn was sailing towards acquittal. At least be rational and bright
enough to see the train heading right for you.

 

[Leo123]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

This administration is rooting out corruption.

 

[Faun]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

No it doesn't Coyote.
Justice was served today.

No, I totally disagree with that. Barr has stepped in/over his lawyers too many times for me to believe that. Flynn lied, there is no doubt, the judge has been clear on that as well.

Justice would have been served IN A COURT - cleared by a court. But Barr has shown himself to be a political creature from the start when he misportrayed the Mueller report, refused to release it, etc. Too many things. This is the real swamp.

I'm not quite sure how a prosecutor can drop charges on an adjudicated case?

He pled guilty twice...but one of the prosecutors quit the case shortly before this was announced. I can see why.

Flynn's already a convicted felon. He didn't appeal. His guilty plea was not withdrawn. I still don't understand what effect dropping the charges on the case has anything to do with this at this point?

 

[Faun]

,lk

These turds can’t form an honest argument. The IG did find many issues with the way the investigation was conducted yet they still need to lie and distort what is valid criticism. That’s pathetic

And frustrating. They are turning valid criticisms into grist to fuel their huge, multifaceted conspiracy theory of a coup. You can’t argue conspiracy theories, logic has no place there, it becomes an exercise in frustation. That is what I found with birthers.

And you willfully ignore the political classes own statements where 19 minutes after inauguration they were already plotting on how to remove him.

Like I said Coyote, look in the mirror.

I did. And I found this.

The Party of No: New Details on the GOP Plot to Obstruct Obama | TIME.com

TIME just published “The Party of No,” an article adapted from my new book, The New New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change in the Obama Era. It reveals some of my reporting on the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whi...

swampland.time.com

Do you not understand that there is a HUGE gulf between obstructing a president, and trying to ILLEGALLY remove one from office? C'mon Coyote. You are not dumb. You are smart, but there is NO equivalency here. One groups actions were LEGAL. The other groups actions, were not.

Do you have a link for that - illegally trying to remove him from office? The only thing I can find is that a CA Dem candidate started a super pac called "Impeach Trump".

BEFORE Trump was elected the FBI was spying on his campaign. ILLEGALLY. You tell me.

Actually, according to Horowitz's report it wasn't illegal, there was sufficient reason for it.

Are you saying that is the basis of the claim that the Dems were plotting to remove Trump?

There was? What, prey tell. The ILLEGALLY obtained steele dossier? Get real.

There was nothing illegal about how the dossier was obtained. Also, it wasn't the only evidence backing up the investigation. So ya, I believe Horowitz, unlike either of us he would have seen all the information.

But back to the question - you said that the Dems were plotting to overthrow Trump before his inauguration - what is that based on?

Yes, there was. The hillary campaign PAID a foreign agent (that's the illegal part) to obtain information to affect the outcome of the election.

No they didn't - they hired and paid Fusion GPS, an American company.

Who acted as a cut out for steele. Just like they hid the payments to steele by filtering(laundering) the payments through their law firm.

The whole thing was dirty which is why they tried like hell to hide everything.

Bullshit. You possess a grand total of zero evidence that Hillary or the DNS were involved with Steele.

They hired an American-based firm. Period.

That is a fucking laughable claim.

Grow up clown boi.

LOLOL

Your surrender is accepted. Of course, I already knew you were shooting blanks since there is no evidence Hillary or the DNC were involved with hiring Steele.

You lose again because you're a loser.

If foreign help was illegal, why didn't Fusion GPS know that?

Ask them.

 

[iceberg]

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

Sure thing Let's pretend the previous administration was not invested
in overthrowing the legally elected president of the United States. And then let's further pretend
some horrible crime has been committed when things are set straight.

You folks really are a brain damaged bunch of children.

Let's pretend we will actually stick to FACTS and not conspiracy theories for a change.

i wish we'd have done that with RUSSIA also.

 

[westwall]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

No it doesn't Coyote.
Justice was served today.

No, I totally disagree with that. Barr has stepped in/over his lawyers too many times for me to believe that. Flynn lied, there is no doubt, the judge has been clear on that as well.

Justice would have been served IN A COURT - cleared by a court. But Barr has shown himself to be a political creature from the start when he misportrayed the Mueller report, refused to release it, etc. Too many things. This is the real swamp.

I'm not quite sure how a prosecutor can drop charges on an adjudicated case?

He pled guilty twice...but one of the prosecutors quit the case shortly before this was announced. I can see why.

Flynn's already a convicted felon. He didn't appeal. His guilty plea was not withdrawn. I still don't understand what effect dropping the charges on the case has anything to do with this at this point?

It means HE'S EXONERATED! You dumbshit.

 

[westwall]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

Really? What planet of delusion do you live on? ALL evidence we have, not opinion, not "news stories"published by propagandists, but REAL evidence, shows that the obama admin was THE most corrupt admin we have ever had.

He abrogated the COTUS, provably, on numerous occasions.

C'mon Coyote. This is just dumb.

 

[Leo123]

I'd like to give the OP 'props' for calling it correctly.

 

[westwall]

Looks Like the Trump Admin is Bringing Dark Secrets to The Light

the only thing different huh? A fictional Deep State behind a fictional coup....but then...you aren't exactly blinded by logic either. There is nothing "fictional" about the charge of Russian collusion that the democrats tried to use to ride Trump out of office with but the Russian collusion...

www.usmessageboard.com

But the federal judge in Washington overseeing the case, Emmet G. Sullivan, forcefully rejected most of the defense’s claims in a 92-page ruling in December.


Corruption.

Yeah, BEFORE the criminal activity of the FBI was exposed.

You need to catch up to the current timeline.

 

[Faun]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

No it doesn't Coyote.
Justice was served today.

No, I totally disagree with that. Barr has stepped in/over his lawyers too many times for me to believe that. Flynn lied, there is no doubt, the judge has been clear on that as well.

Justice would have been served IN A COURT - cleared by a court. But Barr has shown himself to be a political creature from the start when he misportrayed the Mueller report, refused to release it, etc. Too many things. This is the real swamp.

I'm not quite sure how a prosecutor can drop charges on an adjudicated case?

He pled guilty twice...but one of the prosecutors quit the case shortly before this was announced. I can see why.

Flynn's already a convicted felon. He didn't appeal. His guilty plea was not withdrawn. I still don't understand what effect dropping the charges on the case has anything to do with this at this point?

It means HE'S EXONERATED! You dumbshit.

Actually, it means they're asking a court to vacate thd charges. That will exonerate him, and that is actually the answer to my question.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Once the house of cards starts to fall down there is no way of knowing who will go down next.
We only can say the corrupt Obama crime syndicate is on red alert right now.

 

[Slade3200]

the only thing different huh? A fictional Deep State behind a fictional coup....but then...you aren't exactly blinded by logic either.

There is nothing "fictional" about the charge of Russian collusion that the democrats tried to use to ride Trump out of office with but the Russian collusion itself. There was none. None that Robert Mueller would certify, anyway.
The people still obsessed with this matter think they know better than that, however. Zealots always do.

The investigation, imo, was 100% merited. There was enough evidence for sufficient concern. Investigations don't start out with a conclusion, they gather evidence and build from that. The Mueller investigation was thorough, professional, non-partisan and left no stone unturned. I'm satisfied. I do want to see the report released. There was no evidence of criminal conspiracy, but obstruction was another matter. There is nothing fictional about any of that.

But I'm sure deluded leftists believe in the myth of Russian collusion in the same way that residents of mental institutions believe that cats talk to them or fairies and elves come and visit every night when the lights go out.

And deluded rightists will believe it was all a hoax-spawned witch-hunt and ignore the larger implications of it, just as they believe everyone is out to get Trump.

And given your open disdain for Trump as a "cult" are you being unbiased or letting how you feel about Trump allow you to treat him differently? We've already established you are OK treating people differently.

Which is, why I establish points, and not chase rabbits.

The problem with your reasoning is you ignore the points you don't like, including that Mueller was a highly respected prosecutor, that even Trump praised. He was a Republican (as if that would make any difference - people can belong to a political party and do a professional job even though rightists don't seem to believe that). I respect Mueller and I respect the job he did. I respect the findings of our own intelligence and that of other nations that reported Russian attempts to influence elections in multiple countries.

How about you? Are you allowing your bias for Trump to affect the way you view this investigation.

Hell, since you did it already, I'll throw in my own gratuitous Hilary - how about, given your well known antipathy towards her...you think that might influenced your view on the investigation done on her? Comey really screwed her after all.

I'm stopping at your first sentence as this is what you have done the entire thread.

But this is funny n caught my eye...i'm Trump neutral but you keep assigning me more. Why is that? Ignoring facts you don't like?

You just proved my point while struggling to make sense of your own. That has to hurt.

That dog don't hunt. Your posting history and positions you tend to take really don't support that.

Even here. You refuse to consider that there could have been a good reason to investigate Trump.

If there was a good reason to investigate you'd not have the fbi falsifying reports to FISA and using fictional dossiers.

Since this has come up and to see a lack of proper procedures and protocol being followed in the Flynn prosecution, It confounds me how it has gotten this far....
Not Mirandizing Flynn once they decided to charge him, much less possibly charge him with a crime is in and of itself criminal. I don't give a flying flip about how "affable" the agents wanted him to be, the fact that this one simple procedure wasn't done when it should have been is at the least immoral of any investigating authority, and at worst criminal in and of itself. Coming from the overall "Top Cop" agency should concern each and every one of us.... regardless of political affiliation.
Comey's brag about not following procedures is another dirty deed in all of this as well. Policies and Procedures do not change just because a new person steps in..... It doesn't matter if it's military, business nor government. Policies and Procedures are set and adhered to until they are formally changed by those capable of making those changes... and for any changes to take place is a process, until that process is done, then te status quo is intact. To deviate from that is flat out wrong.
There was a statement made about Hillary Clinton's treatment by Comey..... Talk about your apples and oranges... Hillary Clinton was assessed by the FBI to have actually committed a crime, and it kept coming back around and around due to several different reason... yet Comey admits, yes it was wrong but he would not charge her.... since when does the FBI get to decide who and who doesn't get sent up? isn't that the job of the Attorney General??? Yet Comey "really screwed her." I ask you this, who would you have the FBI treat you like? Hillary, or Flynn?

Let's see your evidence Flynn was not read his Miranda rights when he was taken into custody....

Into custody... I have no doubt he was.... Then.
However, when under investigation, suspicion, or there is the slightest possibility the person you are "having a conversation" with could be implicated in any way, shape, form or fashion, it is inherent upon the investigator to mirandize that individual.
I've done enough 15-6 investigations to know this, so why would seasoned FBI agents do otherwise? The answer to that question, is to make things fit their particular agenda.
It really is as simple as that.
Now, if you will excuse me the fish are biting...

The agenda of catching bad guys? How dare they!!!
Two Points...
1.Flynn was told that he could have an attorney present prior to the interview.

2. Flynn acknowledged in court that he had not been tricked by the FBI by not being told he could not lie, and that he knew lying to FBI agents was a federal crime.

Flynn's own words are damning.

yet comeys saying he did shit he'd not do to anyone else isn't.

got it.

Comey's words show he was reckless and disregarded proper procedures. That's not illegal, just wrong. Flynn lied to the FBI. That IS a crime. Contrary to what was claimed - he was told he could have a lawyer. He said he wasn't tricked.

yet if they have no regard for process and are willing to go around them to suit their end goal, you don't give a shit. you like the end goal.

i don't care who they do this to - it would be wrong. if they did it to you, me, slade, hillard, ANY OF US. the action is wrong and i don't care who it's against.

the minute you allow it for YOUR side, you get the divide we have today. so congrats. you play a huge role in your own frustrations.

You make a lot of ASSumptions.

I was and I am still seriously concerned about Russian attempts to influence elections - that's the elephant in the room that people like you avoid seeing or try to downplay. That is the real issue.

To that end - I fully supported the Mueller investigation - there was just too much obstruction, lies, and political games from both sides to not have an impartial professional NON PARTISAN investigation. And Mueller, by the way, was a Republican.

I don't have an "end goal" accept to make sure our electoral integrity and the public trust in our elections is preserved, and that (hopefully) we vote Trump out of office. Did you catch that bit? VOTE him out.

Going around the normal process is reckless - when police do it, it means what they find might not hold up in court. It indicates a person willing to bend or break rules. As a comparison - Comey did indeed go around normal process when he announced, days before the election, that he was reopening an investigation on Hilary (and that might have cost her the election, no way to ever know for sure). He bucked his DoJ bosses. (where is your outrage?) So he hasn't done this just to one side. He has shown himself to be willing to bend rules and to be a showboater. Not good qualities in his position.

Points to consider:
Did he do anything illegal? What laws did he break?

Did Flynn break the law? Yes. He did. And he knew it and knew what the laws were. Regardless of what process Comey circumvented - Flynn still was offered a lawyer, and he knew full well that lying to the FBI was a crime. And he stated he wasn't tricked. You can't just sweep that under the rug.

Comey's already fired but, I suspect if he weren't - he would be now - but it doesn't alter what Flynn did unless laws or rules were broken that prohibited the use of that interview. I think that is up to the courts to determine and they haven't been particularly sympathetic to Flynn so far. I'm fine with what the courts determine because that is their job.

Very well said. You win

Flynn was told he did not need lawyer. That was a fucking lie.

thats not what he was told you’re making that up.

See my former post with a link:

"Comey went on to say that although he took exception to the congressman’s characterization of McCabe’s statement as discouraging, he believed that it was written accurately. He said he had meant that it would be quicker to just speak privately with the agents."


“So I would read it as encouraging him to meet with the agents without White House Counsel present,” Comey said."

Yes, comey told him he could have WH counsel but, the interview was sold as a friendly conversation a Flynn was subsequently told he did not need a lawyer that the interview would be quicker.

And that is what law enforcement typically does. Flynn should know that. If you have a problem with it - you will need to retry a shitload of cases.

The FBI does not try to create crimes typically but they did in Flynn's case.

Lying to FBI agents is not a made up crime

McCabe and Storzk pretended they were welcoming Flynn as new National Security guy. As such, Flynn would have known about the coup so they had to set him up to lie. They pretended to have a casual conversation and when Flynn made misstatements in that casual conversation they sprung on him.

Yet they offered him the invite to bring council and he said in court that he was not tricked and that he lied. Sorry man, you can’t spin beyond that

The DOJ apparently does not agree with that. They dropped the criminal case against Flynn.

Yes I saw that... Barr continues his reign of embarrassment. That dude had a decent reputation before this run

 

[Slade3200]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Yeah, when shown overwhelming evidence of FBI criminal conduct the DOJ only has one option, and that is to drop all charges.

That's what the RULE OF LAW, demands.

No, when shown evidence of criminal conduct people should get arrested... when trying to cover for a liar the charges get dropped... isn’t that what y’all said about Comey and Clinton?

 

[Slade3200]

Let's pretend we will actually stick to FACTS and not conspiracy theories for a change.

I've begged you and your little helpers to look at the evidence included in the Dore/ Mate' video
but you just couldn't be bothered.

Well now I couldn't care less. Just like Trump was railroaded over Russia and Ukraine so Flynn has been
the victim of scumbags like James Comey and Peter Strzok. Here's something for you to consider:

Top Michael Flynn prosecutor moves to withdraw from case

Van Grack has been accused by Flynn's attorneys and conservative media of prosecutorial misconduct.

www.axios.com

Lead prosecutor in the Flynn case resigned abruptly-things weren't going well.

What Barr did is moot as far as I can see. Flynn was sailing towards acquittal. At least be rational and bright
enough to see the train heading right for you.

Your little video discredited itself in the first three minutes... you can’t expect people to waste an hour of their lives watching a video that can’t make it past the intro without telling lies. You can make whatever points you want to make though... don’t need a video to do it for you

 

[Slade3200]

Wow, Barr just dropped the case. Talk about the dirty dirty swamp. How embarrassing for our government

Just goes to show the depth of corruption this administration has created.

This administration is rooting out corruption.

This admin is more corrupt than every admin since Nixon