🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Lynch should either appoint an independent prosecutor or resign. Possibly both.

Loretta Lynch is a scumbag liar .....exactly like her boss Hussein Obama....

She should be ashamed of herself!

Sad she fell so low !

Damn, you're just too stupid to even be funny.
 
Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see. :)


Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

ufonotcomingback.jpg
Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

Holy shit, how old is that story?
MONTHS old, and assholes like Cookie Monster and you Fauxkota, still think it's a SECURITY REVIEW! You liberal morons and anti-American scum just don't get it!


Ancient news. The FBI has already stated there will be no criminal charges.

You just got your ass kicked over Benghazi, there isn't a drop of water in the email scandal, that's already evaporated. Now you're desperately grasping for an Independent investigation, but it won't be Hillary Clinton's emails that will be under investigation. It will be an investigation in the FBI's handling of the case--LOL Where in hell do you think that's going to go and how many millions do you think that would cost?

12darcy-hillaryjpg-a9c0699bbcc242ff.jpg
NO, it doesn't! If it did there would have been NO GRILLING today, but I don't expect your pea sized mind to wrap around that FACT!....And they said Benghazi was, in fact a FUCKED UP OPERATION, BUT the Republicans, being the FECKLESS bunch that they are, wouldn't come out and say the c*unt lied!
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

Which crime do you suppose Lynch committed? Conspiracy, offer the evidence.

How soon the hypocrites forget the scandal in the DOJ under Alberto Gonzales and Monica Goodling. Now all in unison: "boooooooooooosh"

Your desperation is duly noted.

The list of violations is long. Bill Clinton is both a witness and subject of the ongoing FBI criminal charges.
 
And their was no "Blue Dress", right Bill?

Cigars are for smoking, right Bill?

And there was no sensitive information on your personal server, right Hillary?

And Benghazi was all due to a video, right Hillary?

And who are you named after Hillary?

And there were WMDs right Dumbya?
 
And their was no "Blue Dress", right Bill?

Cigars are for smoking, right Bill?

And there was no sensitive information on your personal server, right Hillary?

And Benghazi was all due to a video, right Hillary?

And who are you named after Hillary?

And there were WMDs right Dumbya?

As you know, WMD's were found along with 500 tonnes of yellow cake.
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

If Bush refused to appoint a SP for the thousands of dead and injured in his two wars of choice, why would a SP be appointed in this case?
 
“Lynch should either appoint an independent prosecutor or resign. Possibly both.”

A lame, transparent, and ridiculous partisan proposal made in bad faith, its sole intent to keep an ‘investigation’ ongoing through the GE in the desperate hope of hurting Clinton’s chances.
 
...Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see. :)
If she were running against anyone except Trump, I'd agree 100%. As it is, this election will be won by the candidate American voters loathe the least.
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

Which crime do you suppose Lynch committed? Conspiracy, offer the evidence.

How soon the hypocrites forget the scandal in the DOJ under Alberto Gonzales and Monica Goodling. Now all in unison: "boooooooooooosh"

Your desperation is duly noted.

The list of violations is long. Bill Clinton is both a witness and subject of the ongoing FBI criminal charges.

I'm not feeling desperation, pointing out "guilty until proven innocent is obvious", and a rejection of the ethos upon which our jurisprudence has functioned. Keep in mind we no longer live in 17th Century Salem, MA, though some conservatives seem to wish / think we should.

The list of allegations against President Clinton unproved maybe long, but skirt chasing Pols and powerful men are not an anomaly; only in the US are false pathos given so much attention; the on going hype on his past behavior has nothing to do with his wife's candidacy for POTUS and much to do with understanding how unfit Trump is to be nominated for the highest office in the land by the Republican Party.

You may not know this but their are women attracted to men in much less powerful positions who make the advances and initiate physical contact.
 
According to Wry Catcher no one should ever be investigated for possible crimes unless proven guilty first.

What a dipshit
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

We're officially a Banana Republic; the elites have no fear of the law

About as blatant as it can get. No fear at all. She should be removed and then fully investigated. But i doubt it'll happen.
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

Which crime do you suppose Lynch committed? Conspiracy, offer the evidence.

How soon the hypocrites forget the scandal in the DOJ under Alberto Gonzales and Monica Goodling. Now all in unison: "boooooooooooosh"

Meeting with the Clintons is unacceptable. She should be removed immediately. Then they should fully investigate what transpired at the meeting. The whole thing stinks. The fix is likely in.
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

Which crime do you suppose Lynch committed? Conspiracy, offer the evidence.

How soon the hypocrites forget the scandal in the DOJ under Alberto Gonzales and Monica Goodling. Now all in unison: "boooooooooooosh"

Your desperation is duly noted.

The list of violations is long. Bill Clinton is both a witness and subject of the ongoing FBI criminal charges.

Don't bother. There's D's beside their names. If they had 'R's, that same poster would be demanding accountability. Just more 'Party before Country' Bullshite.
 
I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

Which crime do you suppose Lynch committed? Conspiracy, offer the evidence.

How soon the hypocrites forget the scandal in the DOJ under Alberto Gonzales and Monica Goodling. Now all in unison: "boooooooooooosh"

Your desperation is duly noted.

The list of violations is long. Bill Clinton is both a witness and subject of the ongoing FBI criminal charges.

I'm not feeling desperation, pointing out "guilty until proven innocent is obvious", and a rejection of the ethos upon which our jurisprudence has functioned. Keep in mind we no longer live in 17th Century Salem, MA, though some conservatives seem to wish / think we should.

The list of allegations against President Clinton unproved maybe long, but skirt chasing Pols and powerful men are not an anomaly; only in the US are false pathos given so much attention; the on going hype on his past behavior has nothing to do with his wife's candidacy for POTUS and much to do with understanding how unfit Trump is to be nominated for the highest office in the land by the Republican Party.

You may not know this but their are women attracted to men in much less powerful positions who make the advances and initiate physical contact.

The Attorney General had no business meeting with the Clintons. She should immediately be removed and investigated. Period, end of story.
 
Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

We're officially a Banana Republic; the elites have no fear of the law

About as blatant as it can get. No fear at all. She should be removed and then fully investigated. But i doubt it'll happen.

A post clear and concise: Without due process (an indictment, a trial and a conviction) one more member of the crazy right wing seeks to change hundreds of years of jurisprudence to a new normal: Presumed Guilty until Proven Innocent.

Authoritarian despots, dead and alive, are so proud of this new normal. It fits their needs.
 
The Political Elites are so confident they're above the law, this one basically just told folks up front and publicly, that the fix is in. She has no fear at all of any negative repercussions. She truly believes she's untouchable.

But the real question is, does anybody care? It doesn't look like very many Americans do. They're pretty content just as long as it doesn't interrupt them stuffing their fat faces, watching their porn/sports/reality tv, and shopping till they drop. That's just the sad reality.
 
I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president. None whatsoever.
Loretta Lynch essentially made herself a witness in this investigation. Investigators should want to know what discussion took place on that plane for a half an hour. She is the person that holds the strings to a possible indictment and arrest.
No person in her position should meet with a possible suspect or spouse of one before the decision is made about the possible indictment. She was totally out of line and needs to recuse herself.

It should go further than that. She needs to be investigated. This is corruption at its worst. She should not only be removed, she should be fully investigated as well.

We're officially a Banana Republic; the elites have no fear of the law

About as blatant as it can get. No fear at all. She should be removed and then fully investigated. But i doubt it'll happen.

A post clear and concise: Without due process (an indictment, a trial and a conviction) one more member of the crazy right wing seeks to change hundreds of years of jurisprudence to a new normal: Presumed Guilty until Proven Innocent.

Authoritarian despots, dead and alive, are so proud of this new normal. It fits their needs.

Yes we know, not a shred of corruption and impropriety. They all have D's beside their names. So all is well. :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top