Lynch should either appoint an independent prosecutor or resign. Possibly both.

[CrusaderFrank]

________________________

Hey Fallacy Dude. This fails as a Liberal Dumb-Ass Fallacy.

The Crooked Obama Lap Dog Attorney General and the disbarred pussy-lovin Southern Boy Ex-President put themselves in the position where the Citizens have a right to assume the meeting was nefarious...and upon them to demonstrate how it was not.

They can't carry that burden, leaving her only option to Recuse herself or Resign (because she has shown herself at the very least a Fool.)

You Socialists need to worry about who told her F. B. I. Agents to Go Gestapo on the Citizens and Press at the Airport and insist they take no pictures of a Tax-Payer owned Plane and the events outside of it as it sat on a Public Airport Tarmac.

And when they were told to do such an outrageous thing. Sounds like it was something done before the plane landed...i.e. that there was time to plan.

Doesn't sound like a Chance Meeting at all...and if it wasn't the Dumb-Ass Lackey Attorney General needs to be removed from office for lying to the American People.

MACAULAY's post is an example of pathological anger, such a response is beyond the pale of a normal human response and too typical of the 21st century conservative movement. No other generation would have ever considered the nomination of Donald Trump whose language insights such pathology.

Would any normal person allow MACAULAY to buy, own, possess or ever have in his or her custody or control?

Should take away his First Amendment right as well, right?

Of course not. He is much like you, let him speak and prove what a fool he is.

So you only want to take away one of his fundamental rights because you disagree-- that's awesome

It is not a fundamental right Frank, the late Justice Scalia said so. He was the darling of the right wing ammosexuals.

I don't recall Scalia claiming you lose a right just because...

 

[Wry Catcher]

MACAULAY's post is an example of pathological anger, such a response is beyond the pale of a normal human response and too typical of the 21st century conservative movement. No other generation would have ever considered the nomination of Donald Trump whose language insights such pathology.

Would any normal person allow MACAULAY to buy, own, possess or ever have in his or her custody or control?

Should take away his First Amendment right as well, right?

Of course not. He is much like you, let him speak and prove what a fool he is.

So you only want to take away one of his fundamental rights because you disagree-- that's awesome

It is not a fundamental right Frank, the late Justice Scalia said so. He was the darling of the right wing ammosexuals.

I don't recall Scalia claiming you lose a right just because...

Well Frank, I suppose you need to find someone to read his written decision in Heller to you. Of course that won't help, you're not one of he willfully ignorant, you are one of the willfully deceitful.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

To wit, from the link above:

"Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. See, e.g., Sheldon, in 5 Blume 346; Rawle 123; Pomeroy 152–153; Abbott333. For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendmentor state analogues. See, e.g., State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann., at 489–490; Nunn v. State, 1 Ga., at 251; see generally 2 Kent *340, n. 2; The American Students’ Blackstone 84, n. 11 (G. Chase ed. 1884). Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment , nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.26"

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

________________________

Hey Fallacy Dude. This fails as a Liberal Dumb-Ass Fallacy.

The Crooked Obama Lap Dog Attorney General and the disbarred pussy-lovin Southern Boy Ex-President put themselves in the position where the Citizens have a right to assume the meeting was nefarious...and upon them to demonstrate how it was not.

They can't carry that burden, leaving her only option to Recuse herself or Resign (because she has shown herself at the very least a Fool.)

You Socialists need to worry about who told her F. B. I. Agents to Go Gestapo on the Citizens and Press at the Airport and insist they take no pictures of a Tax-Payer owned Plane and the events outside of it as it sat on a Public Airport Tarmac.

And when they were told to do such an outrageous thing. Sounds like it was something done before the plane landed...i.e. that there was time to plan.

Doesn't sound like a Chance Meeting at all...and if it wasn't the Dumb-Ass Lackey Attorney General needs to be removed from office for lying to the American People.

MACAULAY's post is an example of pathological anger, such a response is beyond the pale of a normal human response and too typical of the 21st century conservative movement. No other generation would have ever considered the nomination of Donald Trump whose language insights such pathology.

Would any normal person allow MACAULAY to buy, own, possess or ever have in his or her custody or control?

Should take away his First Amendment right as well, right?

Of course not. He is much like you, let him speak and prove what a fool he is.

So you only want to take away one of his fundamental rights because you disagree-- that's awesome

It is not a fundamental right Frank, the late Justice Scalia said so. He was the darling of the right wing ammosexuals.

Ammosexual? Are you trying out for the 10th grade prom queen too?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It is not a fundamental right Frank, the late Justice Scalia said so. He was the darling of the right wing ammosexuals.

Ammosexual? Are you trying out for the 10th grade prom queen too?

He's just behaving the way liberals typically behave. No matter how old they get they never mentally mature past the age of 15.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It is not a fundamental right Frank, the late Justice Scalia said so. He was the darling of the right wing ammosexuals.

Ammosexual? Are you trying out for the 10th grade prom queen too?

He's just behaving the way liberals typically behave. No matter how old they get they never mentally mature past the age of 15.

This ^^^ is you rebuttal to this:


"Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. See, e.g., Sheldon, in 5 Blume 346; Rawle 123; Pomeroy 152–153; Abbott333. For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendmentor state analogues. See, e.g., State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann., at 489–490; Nunn v. State, 1 Ga., at 251; see generally 2 Kent *340, n. 2; The American Students’ Blackstone 84, n. 11 (G. Chase ed. 1884). Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment , nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.26"

Only retarded conservatives respond with childish remarks as you have done.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It is not a fundamental right Frank, the late Justice Scalia said so. He was the darling of the right wing ammosexuals.

Ammosexual? Are you trying out for the 10th grade prom queen too?

He's just behaving the way liberals typically behave. No matter how old they get they never mentally mature past the age of 15.

This ^^^ is you rebuttal to this:


"Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. See, e.g., Sheldon, in 5 Blume 346; Rawle 123; Pomeroy 152–153; Abbott333. For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendmentor state analogues. See, e.g., State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann., at 489–490; Nunn v. State, 1 Ga., at 251; see generally 2 Kent *340, n. 2; The American Students’ Blackstone 84, n. 11 (G. Chase ed. 1884). Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment , nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.26"

Only retarded conservatives respond with childish remarks as you have done.

Looks more like a response to this....

Ammosexual? Are you trying out for the 10th grade prom queen too?


But what do I know, I never learned liberal diversion 101.

You are dismissed

 

[Lakhota]

Go Hillary!!!!!

The FBI will not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton for using a private email server while Secretary of State, and Donald Trump is not happy.

Hillary Clinton will not be charged over private email server, Donald Trump flips, report

 

[oreo]

Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

Just how many taxpayer dollars do you want to waste on this crap? Republicans just wasted 7 to 8 million taxpayer dollars trying to nail Hillary Clinton on Benghazi. They had to exonerate her from any negligence after two years of drawn out bullshit.

Now you want to backtrack on the emails, after it's been in the hands of the FBI for the last year. By the way they have already stated there is no criminal wrong doing, so there will be no charges.

And now you WANT to spend more taxpayer dollars for an independent investigation--WTF Well hell why they're at it, they should probably get into Colin Powell & Condi Rices emails as they have the same email issues. Why not, lets just keep throwing millions of dollars down the toilet so we can all chase our tails, in this Hillary Clinton witch hunt.
CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

 

[Lakhota]

Her attempt to meet privately with Bill Clinton is a breach of the public trust. The people are demanding no more politics as usual and this VERY questionable decision by Lynch shows a disregard for what is appropriate.

Just how many taxpayer dollars do you want to waste on this crap? Republicans just wasted 7 to 8 millions dollars trying to nail Hillary Clinton on Benghazi. They had to exonerate her from any negligence after two years of drawn out bullshit.

Now you want to backtrack on the emails, after it's been in the hands of the FBI for the last year. By the way they have already stated there is no criminal wrong doing, so there will be no charges.

And now you WANT to spend more taxpayer dollars for an independent investigation--WTF Well why they're at it, they should probably get into Colin Powell & Condi Rices emails as they have the same email issues. Why not, lets just keep throwing millions of dollars down the toilet so we can all chase our tails.
CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

Amen, and Adolf Trump ain't happy about it.

Hillary Clinton will not be charged over private email server, Donald Trump flips, report

 

[skye]

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president.

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

 

[Vigilante]

• Witness in Email Probe Seen Leaving Clinton’s House On Day She Met With FBI
  Western Journalism ^ | July 2, 2016 | Jack Davis
  Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s former chief of staff during the time Clinton was Secretary of State was spotted leaving Clinton’s residence on the same day Clinton was interviewed by the FBI about her email scandal. Cheryl Mills, who has been called as a witness in the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server, was seen on video leaving Clinton’s home at about 10 a.m. No explanation was given for why a witness in the investigation would be meeting with Clinton. Earlier this week, former President Bill Clinton held a private meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch...

This whole thing is SO CORRUPT AND CROOKED it is making a total international laughing stock of America’s justice system...or lack thereof. While the GOPe says and does nothing. The U.S. government is looking very bad while our enemies laugh.

 

[oreo]

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president.

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails. And while the FBI is getting investigated, they can investigate the emails of Colin Powell & Condi Rice, and if that doesn't come out to your satisfaction, then we can spend millions more for another Independent investigator to investigate the FBI's handling of those cases also.

 

[Vigilante]

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president.

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

 

[Lakhota]

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president.

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

Holy shit, how old is that story?

 

[oreo]

I see no problem with a sitting attorney general meeting with a former president.

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

If you bring in an Independent investigator, they will be investigating the FBI and their handling of Hillary Clinton's emails. Da Duh.

 

[Vigilante]

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

Holy shit, how old is that story?

MONTHS old, and assholes like Cookie Monster and you Fauxkota, still think it's a SECURITY REVIEW! You liberal morons and anti-American scum just don't get it!

 

[Vigilante]

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

If you bring in an Independent investigator, they will be investigating the FBI and their handling of Hillary Clinton's emails. Da Duh.

GOOD! Then we'll see WHY the FBI is stalling after a year of this shit, and who has been holding up the investigation!

 

[Lakhota]

Even if that sitting attorney general is meeting ex parte with the spouse of a person under FBI investigation?

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

If you bring in an Independent investigator, they will be investigating the FBI and their handling of Hillary Clinton's emails. Da Duh.

They can always call Ken Starr. I hear he's out of work - since being fired from Baylor University over a sex scandal.

 

[skye]

Loretta Lynch is a scumbag liar .....exactly like her boss Hussein Obama....

She should be ashamed of herself!

Sad she fell so low !

 

[oreo]

Was Hillary there during the meeting?

Who knows....probably yes....on the phone.... with those two crooks Lynch and Bill

Americans are revolted by this.

In my humble opinion this will cost Hillary Rotten Clinton the election. This was the last straw.

We shall see.

Yeah right--LOL The FBI stated weeks ago that there was no crime, so there will be no charges.

So basically what you and others are saying now, is that we need to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for an Independent investigator, so they can investigate the FBI, and they're handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Then just what the fuck are they investigating?....That's all the FBI does CRIMINAL WORK!

The FBI Just Gave Hillary The Worst News Of Her Campaign!
www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/
The FBI is now officially expanding their investigations into Hillary's illegal use of a ... source told a reporter, “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure and are ... This is clearly a full-blow criminal investigation, which is obvious from the ...

Holy shit, how old is that story?

MONTHS old, and assholes like Cookie Monster and you Fauxkota, still think it's a SECURITY REVIEW! You liberal morons and anti-American scum just don't get it!

Ancient news. The FBI has already stated there will be no criminal charges.

You just got your ass kicked over Benghazi, there isn't a drop of water in the email scandal, that's already evaporated. Now you're desperately grasping for an Independent investigation, but it won't be Hillary Clinton's emails that will be under investigation. It will be an investigation into the FBI's handling of the case--LOL Where in hell do you think that's going to go and how many millions do you think that would cost? This is hilarious. An investigation into the investigators--LOL