Lyndsey Graham Who Was Directly Lied To Says House Benghazi Report Full of C R A P

[candycorn]

These people will never accept any findings that conflict with the narrative they've constructed.

What's amusing about that comment, Carbineer is that it's an EXACT description of the hardcore Obama supporter! You have a "narrative" that you've bought into when it comes to Barack Obama and you steadfastly refuse to admit that your narrative has little to do with the reality of the man who is floundering so badly as President.

Quote me doing any such thing.

Keep in mind ... this is from the same poster who falsely claimed that Obama invoked executive privilege on 14,000 documents about Benghazi.

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

 

[Faun]

As I said before, Faun...it's hard keeping track of the Obama scandals...they've come at such a furious pace it's a daunting task.

No, it's not hard at all since these are not actual scandals but rather bitching and moaning from the right. Perfect case in point is Benghazi. You call that a scandal when in reality, 7 investigations concluded there was no wrong-doing by Obama's administration. Screaming, "scandal!" over and over again with the hopes it will actually turn in to one, isn't really a scandal.

Besides, it's your responsibility to keep facts straight. It's not by job to sort through your bullshit. If you're not up to the task, perhaps this is the wrong forum for you?

 

[BlindBoo]

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

Actually they always blamed extremest for the attack.

Oh, come on, Boo...you're embarrassing yourself here! The Ben Rhodes email prepping Susan Rice for her appearances on all those Sunday morning talk shows showed EXACTLY who they wanted to blame for the Benghazi attack and it wasn't terrorists.

"We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to -- or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in -- in the wake of the revolution in Libya are -- are common and accessible. And it then evolved from there."

Furthermore the the report they released just doesn't back up the obvious lies of the right about the talking points.

Only one problem with that scenario, Boo...there was no small number of people who went to the consulate to protest. Video tapes show nobody there before the actual attack.

And as the report says there were conflicting reports that were not resolve before she went on the talks shows to present the talking points. But in everyone of her appearances she always claim it was extremist who came with heavy weapons to attack.

 

[mudwhistle]

The difference between you and I, Faun is that I'll readily admit that Bush did so to hide something. Now would you like to explain to me the rationale for Obama to do so?

How magnanimous of you, though actually, you didn't answer ... "what was Bush hiding," was the question.

As far as Obama invoking executive privilege on Benghazi, help me out here ... when did that occur?

It's not up to us to educate you. You have to do that yourself. Learn how to Google.

It's up to your team to prove what is claimed. How do you expect me to educate myself about rightwing claims which are not true?

Are you claiming he never has claimed executive privilege?

The claim made was that Obama invoked executive privilege to prevent the release of 14,000 documents on Benghazi. I asked for proof of that when you chimed in that I should look it up myself. I see no evidence of that, but if it did occur, then prove it...

He did for Fast &Furious, but not for Benghazi. He's not at that point yet. Give it a year or two.

 

[Oldstyle]

What's amusing about that comment, Carbineer is that it's an EXACT description of the hardcore Obama supporter! You have a "narrative" that you've bought into when it comes to Barack Obama and you steadfastly refuse to admit that your narrative has little to do with the reality of the man who is floundering so badly as President.

Quote me doing any such thing.

Keep in mind ... this is from the same poster who falsely claimed that Obama invoked executive privilege on 14,000 documents about Benghazi.

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

 

[Oldstyle]

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

Actually they always blamed extremest for the attack.

Oh, come on, Boo...you're embarrassing yourself here! The Ben Rhodes email prepping Susan Rice for her appearances on all those Sunday morning talk shows showed EXACTLY who they wanted to blame for the Benghazi attack and it wasn't terrorists.

"We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to -- or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in -- in the wake of the revolution in Libya are -- are common and accessible. And it then evolved from there."

Furthermore the the report they released just doesn't back up the obvious lies of the right about the talking points.

Only one problem with that scenario, Boo...there was no small number of people who went to the consulate to protest. Video tapes show nobody there before the actual attack.

And as the report says there were conflicting reports that were not resolve before she went on the talks shows to present the talking points. But in everyone of her appearances she always claim it was extremist who came with heavy weapons to attack.

Dude, in every one of her appearances she did EXACTLY what Ben Rhodes email instructed her to do...she blamed the attack on a YouTube video protest that escalated. The intelligence reports that the Obama White House already had received refuted that "protest gone bad" claim. It's obvious from the fight that ensued between the Hillary Clinton led State Department and the intelligence community on State's insistence that the talking points be changed and the CIA's reluctance to do so.

 

[Oldstyle]

As I said before, Faun...it's hard keeping track of the Obama scandals...they've come at such a furious pace it's a daunting task.

No, it's not hard at all since these are not actual scandals but rather bitching and moaning from the right. Perfect case in point is Benghazi. You call that a scandal when in reality, 7 investigations concluded there was no wrong-doing by Obama's administration. Screaming, "scandal!" over and over again with the hopes it will actually turn in to one, isn't really a scandal.

Besides, it's your responsibility to keep facts straight. It's not by job to sort through your bullshit. If you're not up to the task, perhaps this is the wrong forum for you?

You obviously haven't read the reports. They exonerated the intelligence community. They did not exonerate the Obama Administration.

 

[Oldstyle]

As for my being up to the task of addressing the failings of this Administration?

I'm really a pain in the ass for you liberals, aren't I, Faun? I'm not a religious nut. I'm not a racist you can goad into an idiotic rant. I'm not someone who cites ridiculous internet sources. All I do is point out what I see happening with this President.

I know you don't like that. Heck, I wouldn't want the unenviable job of defending someone who's obviously in over their heads like this White House is. Hang in there...only two more years of Barry and then it will all be over.

 

[EconChick]

As for my being up to the task of addressing the failings of this Administration?

I'm really a pain in the ass for you liberals, aren't I, Faun? I'm not a religious nut. I'm not a racist you can goad into an idiotic rant. I'm not someone who cites ridiculous internet sources. All I do is point out what I see happening with this President.

I know you don't like that. Heck, I wouldn't want the unenviable job of defending someone who's obviously in over their heads like this White House is. Hang in there...only two more years of Barry and then it will all be over.

There used to be a day when I enjoyed debating liberals with opposing views. But the ones that hang out on this board have got to be the dumbest, most classless village idiots I've ever seen in my life. And I HAVE seen a lot of dumb liberals.

That report was a slow roll to try to undermine Trey Gowdy's upcoming hearings where he actually has been doing his fucking job doing a thorough investigation.

I think Rogers actually did a favor in putting Benghazi back out on the front burner so that Benghazi will be in the forefront of people's minds when Gowdy makes his announcements in coming weeks. This board is going to be funnnnnnnnnn watching liberals come unglued at that time.

 

[EconChick]

So what was Bush hiding when he signed an executive order to prevent Reagan's and Poppy's presidential records from the public?

The difference between you and I, Faun is that I'll readily admit that Bush did so to hide something. Now would you like to explain to me the rationale for Obama to do so?

How magnanimous of you, though actually, you didn't answer ... "what was Bush hiding," was the question.

As far as Obama invoking executive privilege on Benghazi, help me out here ... when did that occur?

It's not up to us to educate you. You have to do that yourself. Learn how to Google.

It's up to your team to prove what is claimed. How do you expect me to educate myself about rightwing claims which are not true?

Are you claiming he never has claimed executive privilege?

These classless, brainless, pathological liars claim plenty of things normal people know to be bullshit. They're so desperate and demoralized that it's the only thing they have left.

Faun and Carbee (and Loner Loser) are particularly pathetic when it comes to making up lies out of thin air.

The whole world knows Obama has claimed executive privilege yet they will actually come on here and claim he hasn't.

Just like he's not issuing an Executive Order on Immigration. (roll eyes)

 

[candycorn]

Quote me doing any such thing.

Keep in mind ... this is from the same poster who falsely claimed that Obama invoked executive privilege on 14,000 documents about Benghazi.

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

You'd have to ask the terrorists.

We do know there was wide-spread upheaval in Libya prior to 9/11; how much was attributed to a video or the standard amount of chaos in the ME is something you'd have to ask them.

 

[Oldstyle]

Keep in mind ... this is from the same poster who falsely claimed that Obama invoked executive privilege on 14,000 documents about Benghazi.

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

You'd have to ask the terrorists.

We do know there was wide-spread upheaval in Libya prior to 9/11; how much was attributed to a video or the standard amount of chaos in the ME is something you'd have to ask them.

Nice attempt at a dodge, Candy...

You don't have to ask the terrorists though...all you have to do is look at the video from cameras outside the Consulate that night. There were no protesters prior to the attack. None. Care to try again?

 

[EconChick]

Keep in mind ... this is from the same poster who falsely claimed that Obama invoked executive privilege on 14,000 documents about Benghazi.

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

You'd have to ask the terrorists.

We do know there was wide-spread upheaval in Libya prior to 9/11; how much was attributed to a video or the standard amount of chaos in the ME is something you'd have to ask them.

Good Lord you're thick. That issue has been put to bed. No one even debates the video issues any more. But you're here for nothing more than typing lies.

You lost ALL credibility just before the election. There's a price for selling your soul to the devil, dumb ass. But thanks for keeping my thread going. That's useful to me.

 

[candycorn]

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

You'd have to ask the terrorists.

We do know there was wide-spread upheaval in Libya prior to 9/11; how much was attributed to a video or the standard amount of chaos in the ME is something you'd have to ask them.

Nice attempt at a dodge, Candy...

You don't have to ask the terrorists though...all you have to do is look at the video from cameras outside the Consulate that night. There were no protesters prior to the attack. None. Care to try again?

No.

You asked why there wasn't a protest.

 

[candycorn]

It's one of the reasons Ben-Gotcha is going to be a non-factor. Aside from the GOP mis-representation of the supposed "cover up", there was no scandal. Americans tend to blame terrorism on the terrorists

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

You'd have to ask the terrorists.

We do know there was wide-spread upheaval in Libya prior to 9/11; how much was attributed to a video or the standard amount of chaos in the ME is something you'd have to ask them.

Good Lord you're thick. That issue has been put to bed. No one even debates the video issues any more. But you're here for nothing more than typing lies.

You lost ALL credibility just before the election. There's a price for selling your soul to the devil, dumb ass. But thanks for keeping my thread going. That's useful to me.

Enjoying the Thanksgiving holidays from Jr. High I see.

Exactly how does keeping a thread going benefit you?
.
BTW: Price of gas below $2.60. Thanks Obama.

 

[EconChick]

Just answer this question.

Why not?

Why didn't anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?

You mean after the CIA's counter attack on the compound where they repelled the attackers and rescued all but two people inside the Consulate? Or while they were all at the CIA's compound waiting for the response team from Tripoli?

These people will never accept any findings that conflict with the narrative they've constructed.

What's amusing about that comment, Carbineer is that it's an EXACT description of the hardcore Obama supporter! You have a "narrative" that you've bought into when it comes to Barack Obama and you steadfastly refuse to admit that your narrative has little to do with the reality of the man who is floundering so badly as President.

Quote me doing any such thing.

Keep in mind ... this is from the same poster who falsely claimed that Obama invoked executive privilege on 14,000 documents about Benghazi.

A Liberal that can't even manage to stay on the topic about how the House report has more holes than Swiss Cheese,

You should take it up with the Republicans in the House. They liked their report.
It hurts bad when you lose with what you thought was a winning hand.
You do understand that it is only people like you who would accept nothing less than placing full blame on Obama or Hillary or both.

Just come out an admit that nothing less than finding Obama and CO fully responsible for the deaths in Benghazi would be acceptable.

But really, your problem is with the Republicans conducting the investigation. Someone should have bribed them to get the results you wanted.

Everyone knows that committee is stove piped. This will boomerang in your faces because the holes are so big it's got to be one of the shittiest reports ever out of the House.

No one knows why that idiot Rogers signed off....he will lose credibility too. Trey Gowdy has had serious investigations underway that already refute the stupid report.

Gee, a Republican thinks a Republican report is shitty. What's the world coming to?

Most Republicans on that committee didn't have a chance to weigh in on it, moron. If you actually read anything other than liberal rags you'd know that.

Between what Gowdy is about to do with his Select Committee, and the way the Republicans on THIS committee are going to correct Roger's idiocy.....it's going to be fun watching you libs come unglue in a few weeks from now.

Can hardly wait.

 

[EconChick]

Except for the people in the Obama Administration that blamed terrorism on a YouTube video...right, Candy?

The video was the source. The person to blame for terrorism is the terrorist.

The YouTube video was the "source" of the Benghazi attack? Then why WASN'T there a protest before the attack, Candy?

You'd have to ask the terrorists.

We do know there was wide-spread upheaval in Libya prior to 9/11; how much was attributed to a video or the standard amount of chaos in the ME is something you'd have to ask them.

Good Lord you're thick. That issue has been put to bed. No one even debates the video issues any more. But you're here for nothing more than typing lies.

You lost ALL credibility just before the election. There's a price for selling your soul to the devil, dumb ass. But thanks for keeping my thread going. That's useful to me.

Enjoying the Thanksgiving holidays from Jr. High I see.

Exactly how does keeping a thread going benefit you?
.
BTW: Price of gas below $2.60. Thanks Obama.

Gas has already started going back up over $3. Thanks Obama.

See how that works, dummy?

Try to stay on topic. This is about what a whitewash the report was.

 

[candycorn]

It will be fun watching the GOP go down this road again...all for naught.

 

[EconChick]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

Today, Graham was on CNN saying the same thing. When asked for any evidence, he couldn't come up with any.

Because it's classified you idiot. He's not going to tell you on CNN. Jesus, do you libs on this board know ANY FUCKING THING about ANYTHING?

 

[EconChick]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

Today, Graham was on CNN saying the same thing. When asked for any evidence, he couldn't come up with any.

Because it's classified you idiot. He's not going to tell you on CNN. Jesus, do you libs on this board know ANY FUCKING THING about ANYTHING?