Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So then someone can threaten the occupants of the White House, because there are many Secret Service personnel around? That would seem to be your conclusion.Oops.
The male "knowingly and willfully transmitted in interstate and foreign commerce a cellular phone communication to Cable News Network (CNN), and that communication contained a threat to injure employees of CNN, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §875(c)."
Probable cause. Agent Smith found the number in an online database and analyzed the recorded audio.
Fucking idiots. Fake news, fake criminal charge.
Proper response: keep an eye on the situation for a while, try to find out why the man is so angry; maybe he had too much to drink or CNN spiked his coffee or something like that, or, like most Americans, he was angry at the fake news. If the man presents a credible threat, keep an eye on the general situation, not on him alone, and if not, drop it and move on, because you have more important work to do at the FBI.
CNN is a big company with plenty of competent private security and plenty of competent private investigators; they do not need to be molly-coddled by the FBI like some cute girl with a complaint that some guy is like sort of creepy and she just doesn't want to see him around her block.
So then someone can threaten the occupants of the White House,
because there are many Secret Service personnel around?
And you can type all that shit with a straight face, can you?Oops.
The male "knowingly and willfully transmitted in interstate and foreign commerce a cellular phone communication to Cable News Network (CNN), and that communication contained a threat to injure employees of CNN, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §875(c)."
Probable cause. Agent Smith found the number in an online database and analyzed the recorded audio.
Fucking idiots. Fake news, fake criminal charge.
Proper response: keep an eye on the situation for a while, try to find out why the man is so angry; maybe he had too much to drink or CNN spiked his coffee or something like that, or, like most Americans, he was angry at the fake news. If the man presents a credible threat, keep an eye on the general situation, not on him alone, and if not, drop it and move on, because you have more important work to do at the FBI.
CNN is a big company with plenty of competent private security and plenty of competent private investigators; they do not need to be molly-coddled by the FBI like some cute girl with a complaint that some guy is like sort of creepy and she just doesn't want to see him around her block.
CNN is doing a great job killing itself! It has been in a ratings free-fall for the last year. Why fix something that is working?
You're the fool, fool. CNN hardly makes the top ten now.CNN is doing a great job killing itself! It has been in a ratings free-fall for the last year. Why fix something that is working?
Fool.
Trump is wrong. CNN's ratings are up.
Feds: Man threatened to kill CNN employees
He claimed "fake news" and all that, it is pretty clear how he stands politically.
Oops.
The male "knowingly and willfully transmitted in interstate and foreign commerce a cellular phone communication to Cable News Network (CNN), and that communication contained a threat to injure employees of CNN, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §875(c)."
Probable cause. Agent Smith found the number in an online database and analyzed the recorded audio.
Fucking idiots. Fake news, fake criminal charge.
Proper response: keep an eye on the situation for a while, try to find out why the man is so angry; maybe he had too much to drink or CNN spiked his coffee or something like that, or, like most Americans, he was angry at the fake news. If the man presents a credible threat, keep an eye on the general situation, not on him alone, and if not, drop it and move on, because you have more important work to do at the FBI.
CNN is a big company with plenty of competent private security and plenty of competent private investigators; they do not need to be molly-coddled by the FBI like some cute girl with a complaint that some guy is like sort of creepy and she just doesn't want to see him around her block.
I'm gonna ax your a question...how come Trump got more Blacks and Latinos to vote for him than Romney?I'm gonna say it before Trump does....NOT ALL CRAZY WHITE PEOPLE WHO FOLLOW ME AND EVERY TWEET WHO THREATEN TO KILL MF'S IS BAD.
Acting on a threat of terrorism is not "molly-coddling" the recipients. Making terrorist threats is no laughing matter.
Acting on a threat of terrorism is not "molly-coddling" the recipients. Making terrorist threats is no laughing matter.
A "threat" is an actual danger, alleged in good faith.
There is no good faith in these allegations. That CNN paper boy cried wolf already.
In the eighties, when I was a schoolchild, both boys and girls would yell things like, "You're dead meat!" or "I'm going to kill you for that!" Such phrases were more like an acknowledgement of a comeback for a joke than anything, and no one interpreted such common sayings as a "threat."
The eighties were kinder and gentler, and men still had freedom of speech back then. Nowadays, men are required to abide by the "reasonable whore" standard, whereby any speech that makes a "reasonable whore" feel scared or hurt is a felony threat.
Nowadays, men who say things like that, only jokingly are accused of "terrorism" which by definition is the crime of making a girl feel scared.
Listen, Ms. Howling Wolf, if an otherwise attractive man says something like, "I'm going to blow myself up and kill a bunch of people!" but makes no move to do so, then that person is not a threat.
Hang up the phone, bitch, stop eavesdropping, get out of the man's bed, let him have his space, stay off his property, and focus on actual threats to your own life and well-being, because there will be such if you don't stop this nonsense. And you cried wolf already, you don't get a law enforcement response for that.
According to the article, he made 22 calls to the CNN offices.
The FBI apparently found probable cause to arrest him.
You are completely weird. ... Why does this have anything to do with sex, with me or anyone else? You seem to have a sex hang-up of some sort. You should see someone about that.
According to the article, he made 22 calls to the CNN offices.
In this case law enforcement also failed in their duty to warn. They could have paid the man a polite visit and warned him of CNN's intention to file criminal charges. Otherwise, well, CNN could have simply blocked his number if the calls were distracting them from their work. This failure of the duty to warn implies permission from both CNN and law enforcement to make the communications that he made.
Furthermore, the man's communications were apparently directed at a corporation, not to any specific natural person.
A corporation cannot legitimately be the victim of harassing or threatening communications, nor can several girls who all know each other suddenly "come forward" at the same time with vaguely criminal accusations that they feel "threatened" by "that guy" who "keeps calling," and expect to meet the standard of probable cause on their testimony, after having already discussed their prospective testimony and agreed on their story among themselves.
That would constitute perjury, false swearing, and obstruction of justice.
Finally, well, good luck getting news tips from the general public, if you are simply going to record the calls and turn them over to the police :/
The FBI apparently found probable cause to arrest him.
The original recording of calls took place without a warrant and without any bona fide investigation of possible actual terrorist activity, limiting the investigation to some communication that was possibly perceived to be threatening. Wholesale warrantless surveillance is inadmissible in court.
You are completely weird. ... Why does this have anything to do with sex, with me or anyone else? You seem to have a sex hang-up of some sort. You should see someone about that.
At least *I* am not trolling this forum for dates or sexual partners. I am simply not in mood for it until I can get all you creepy lezbo fascist communists off my back and out of my hair for good. Whether I am seeing someone or not is none of your business, and my relationship status is definitely not up for grabs.
