Manafort associate paid Ukrainian cash to Trump inauguration, prosecutors say

[Lesh]

ZOMG!!!! A guy Manafort knew bought a ticket with Ukrainian currency!

No, a guy Manafort knew served as a middle man to complete a prohibited transaction. Then, he tried to conceal the act by lying to Congress.

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

No is yet tying this to Trump.

But it shows that the Russian intel (Kilimnik is a Russian intel officer and he was the Russian involved here) WAS putting money into Trump coffers...illegally

 

[bripat9643]

ZOMG!!!! A guy Manafort knew bought a ticket with Ukrainian currency!

No, a guy Manafort knew served as a middle man to complete a prohibited transaction. Then, he tried to conceal the act by lying to Congress.

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

First you asked for a connection to Donald. Now you're talking about people controlled by Donald. How about you cut to the chase and ask the question that's at the end of the list so we don't have to waste time with this song and dance? We all know that it ends with the same result--you giving Donald the Lewinsky.

The great thing about porn is that nobody wastes time with this foreplay bullshit.

"He attended the inauguration" is not a connection to Trump anymore than me watching him on TV means I have a connection to him.

 

[Lesh]

No, a guy Manafort knew served as a middle man to complete a prohibited transaction. Then, he tried to conceal the act by lying to Congress.

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

First you asked for a connection to Donald. Now you're talking about people controlled by Donald. How about you cut to the chase and ask the question that's at the end of the list so we don't have to waste time with this song and dance? We all know that it ends with the same result--you giving Donald the Lewinsky.

The great thing about porn is that nobody wastes time with this foreplay bullshit.

"He attended the inauguration" is not a connection to Trump anymore than me watching him on TV means I have a connection to him.

Again...no one is tying this directly to Trump yet.

You seem a little nervous.

And dumping $50K into an inauguration is a little bit more than "watching on television"

 

[bripat9643]

ZOMG!!!! A guy Manafort knew bought a ticket with Ukrainian currency!

No, a guy Manafort knew served as a middle man to complete a prohibited transaction. Then, he tried to conceal the act by lying to Congress.

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

No is yet tying this to Trump.

But it shows that the Russian intel (Kilimnik is a Russian intel officer and he was the Russian involved here) WAS putting money into Trump coffers...illegally

The inauguration is not "Trump coffers," moron. We know what he did is illegal. What you can't demonstrate is that it has anything to do with Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

First you asked for a connection to Donald. Now you're talking about people controlled by Donald. How about you cut to the chase and ask the question that's at the end of the list so we don't have to waste time with this song and dance? We all know that it ends with the same result--you giving Donald the Lewinsky.

The great thing about porn is that nobody wastes time with this foreplay bullshit.

"He attended the inauguration" is not a connection to Trump anymore than me watching him on TV means I have a connection to him.

Again...no one is tying this directly to Trump yet.

You seem a little nervous.

And dumping $50K into an inauguration is a little bit more than "watching on television"

It has nothing to do with Trump, dumbass.

And you are implying that somehow this shows Trump is corrupt. It shows nothing of the sort.

Who do you think you're fooling?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

No, a guy Manafort knew served as a middle man to complete a prohibited transaction. Then, he tried to conceal the act by lying to Congress.

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

First you asked for a connection to Donald. Now you're talking about people controlled by Donald. How about you cut to the chase and ask the question that's at the end of the list so we don't have to waste time with this song and dance? We all know that it ends with the same result--you giving Donald the Lewinsky.

The great thing about porn is that nobody wastes time with this foreplay bullshit.

"He attended the inauguration" is not a connection to Trump anymore than me watching him on TV means I have a connection to him.

Yeah, he did a little more than simply watch the swearing in from the National Mall. People pay thousands of dollars to attend exclusive inaugural events so they can get access to the new President.

It's funny how defensive you are being about this. You're so terrified about how bad this might be, you can't be bothered to grasp the real events for what they are.

 

[Lesh]

No, a guy Manafort knew served as a middle man to complete a prohibited transaction. Then, he tried to conceal the act by lying to Congress.

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

No is yet tying this to Trump.

But it shows that the Russian intel (Kilimnik is a Russian intel officer and he was the Russian involved here) WAS putting money into Trump coffers...illegally

The inauguration is not "Trump coffers," moron. We know what he did is illegal. What you can't demonstrate is that it has anything to do with Trump.

Why the name calling?

Are you that flustered by all this?

No one has said anything about Trump being directly tied to this.

You're angst is a tell dude.

 

[tinydancer]

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

First you asked for a connection to Donald. Now you're talking about people controlled by Donald. How about you cut to the chase and ask the question that's at the end of the list so we don't have to waste time with this song and dance? We all know that it ends with the same result--you giving Donald the Lewinsky.

The great thing about porn is that nobody wastes time with this foreplay bullshit.

"He attended the inauguration" is not a connection to Trump anymore than me watching him on TV means I have a connection to him.

Again...no one is tying this directly to Trump yet.

You seem a little nervous.

And dumping $50K into an inauguration is a little bit more than "watching on television"

50 grand is chump change in the grand scheme of things. When you can make half a million for just one speech in Russia......................now you're talking real time coin.

 

[tinydancer]

So here we go again. The Podestas worked for the same Ukrainians but nothing happens to them. Wow. Just wow.

 

[bripat9643]

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

First you asked for a connection to Donald. Now you're talking about people controlled by Donald. How about you cut to the chase and ask the question that's at the end of the list so we don't have to waste time with this song and dance? We all know that it ends with the same result--you giving Donald the Lewinsky.

The great thing about porn is that nobody wastes time with this foreplay bullshit.

"He attended the inauguration" is not a connection to Trump anymore than me watching him on TV means I have a connection to him.

Yeah, he did a little more than simply watch the swearing in from the National Mall. People pay thousands of dollars to attend exclusive inaugural events so they can get access to the new President.

It's funny how defensive you are being about this. You're so terrified about how bad this might be, you can't be bothered to grasp the real events for what they are.

It doesn't matter what his motives are. Trump had nothing to do with it. It has no legal implications for him.

Correcting your sleazy innuendos is not being "defensive." You're implying that this proves something corrupt about Trump. You're a fucking douchebag. I correct snowflake bullshit whenever I see it.

 

[bripat9643]

The connection to Trump couldn't be more tenuous.

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

No is yet tying this to Trump.

But it shows that the Russian intel (Kilimnik is a Russian intel officer and he was the Russian involved here) WAS putting money into Trump coffers...illegally

The inauguration is not "Trump coffers," moron. We know what he did is illegal. What you can't demonstrate is that it has anything to do with Trump.

Why the name calling?

Are you that flustered by all this?

No one has said anything about Trump being directly tied to this.

You're angst is a tell dude.

I always use accurate labels for sleazy snowflake douchebags. Did you imagine you deserve to be treated with respect or something?

 

[Lesh]

As far as I can see, the connection to Donald is fairly solid. Unless there was a typo in the news reports, they're talking about the 2017 inauguration, not the 2012 one.

Trump doesn't control every act of every person who attends the inauguration, dumbass. Trump didn't even know any of these people.

No is yet tying this to Trump.

But it shows that the Russian intel (Kilimnik is a Russian intel officer and he was the Russian involved here) WAS putting money into Trump coffers...illegally

The inauguration is not "Trump coffers," moron. We know what he did is illegal. What you can't demonstrate is that it has anything to do with Trump.

Why the name calling?

Are you that flustered by all this?

No one has said anything about Trump being directly tied to this.

You're angst is a tell dude.

I always use accurate labels for sleazy snowflake douchebags. Did you imagine you deserve to be treated with respect or something?

WHat you do...is scream epithets...and it shows weakness and desperation

 

[Stormy Daniels]

It doesn't matter what his motives are. Trump had nothing to do with it. It has no legal implications for him.

Okay, cool. Next time, you should wait until someone makes that claim before you deny it.

Correcting your sleazy innuendos is not being "defensive."

Imagining innuendos where none have been made is being defensive. Or schizophrenic. You pick.

You're implying that this proves something corrupt about Trump.

No I'm not.

You're a fucking douchebag. I correct snowflake bullshit whenever I see it.

Aww, you has a sad. Come to mommy, kiss the boo-boo, make it feel aww better.