Maybe you should have said that in response to the quote where I mentioned Obama, instead of just saying what you did, along with your later response of Nuremberg...The point of your post was defend me saying they shouldn't be spreading fear... Were you implying that Obama or the government will soon be opening up concentration camps?Lol...that's it?
OK.
I didn't know that the first camp opened in '33.
So it was the sentiment of a German in 1932 instead of 1937.
I have no fear of admitting when I am wrong about something.
I should have looked up the fact that concentration camps in Germany existed far earlier than I imagined.
Thanks for clearing that up.
But since it is trivial and has no bearing on anything else in this thread except that one tiny post, and not even the POINT of that post...I have no idea what your point is.
So please...continue stamping your foot and calling names to your hearts content.
But try to make an intelligent comment somewhere in the contents of your post.
Thanks in advance.
The point of my post was that I was sure that a German in 1932 (THANK YOU L.K. EDER) probably shared your sentiment that no concentration camps could possibly be instituted in Germany.
It is your blind partisanship that makes this about Obama.
The example I use was Bush era, not Obama.
Ergo, I am neither being partisan nor implying anything about Obama or anyone else...I am only explaining why there is a need for the Oathtakers and the reinforcement of refusing illegal orders.
Anything else you read into my comments is your own projection.
Take off your Obama tinged glasses and go back and read my posts.
Speaking of back tracking.