- Thread starter
- #41
So a pair of rude hoodlums who each tried to cut in front of traffic, creating a bottleneck and stealing time from motorists behind them, settled their falling-out through darwinism with the one with the gun winning.
That is the fault of a gun, how? Shouldn't it be the fault of the cars and the road merge design, too?
Link / quote to anywhere anyone suggested "it's the fault of the gun"?
What's the first word in the title here Einstein?
A gun cannot initiate an action and therefore cannot be "at fault". Nor can it "win" for the same reason. What "won" here is the gun culture. Again --- the idea that "I can get to this ramp one car faster by shooting at that car".
Why is this sailing over your tiny little head?
Why are you continuing to backpedal on the fact that you politicized this incident with a gun control reference?
Are every one of you fucking people completely illiterate?
I made no mention of "gun control". Anywhere. Prove me wrong.
You illiterati have to quit blaming the writer for your own failure of reading comprehension.