OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,607
- 2,220
Neither of you (you or Taz) have told me WHY not, when people's right to own a gun can be blocked if they are a felon or diagnosed as a danger to self and others. Or a perpetrator of domestic violence. So failing to have a clean bill of mental health is somehow different? How?You are asking too hard a question. I have no idea how to start what you're saying, even though I agree it's entirely sensible.So a pair of rude hoodlums who each tried to cut in front of traffic, creating a bottleneck and stealing time from motorists behind them, settled their falling-out through darwinism with the one with the gun winning.
That is the fault of a gun, how? Shouldn't it be the fault of the cars and the road merge design, too?
Link / quote to anywhere anyone suggested "it's the fault of the gun"?
What's the first word in the title here Einstein?
A gun cannot initiate an action and therefore cannot be "at fault". Nor can it "win" for the same reason. What "won" here is the gun culture. Again --- the idea that "I can get to this ramp one car faster by shooting at that car".
Why is this sailing over your tiny little head?
Why are you continuing to backpedal on the fact that you politicized this incident with a gun control reference?
Are every one of you fucking people completely illiterate?
I made no mention of "gun control". Anywhere. Prove me wrong.
You illiterati have to quit blaming the writer for your own failure of reading comprehension.
And I'm the one muddying your water with gun control threats. Lo siento.
Well, since most of the mass shootings in the past few years that weren't terror related were performed by mentally unstable people, why not? We give psych evals to people entering the military and law enforcement who will be handling guns. Why not our civilians? Your argument doesn't actually hold water. We DO have laws and restrictions around gun ownership and passing a test showing you are not a violent whack job would probably be one of the more sensible laws.The Constitution doesn't specify that domestic abusers cannot own a gun, yet we have that law. We can require a psychological evaluation if we want to.France requires a psychological evaluation prior to getting a firearms license and it is regularly renewed. Not a bad idea.
France doesn't have a Constitution guaranteeing a right to bear arms.
The Constitution doesn't declare a right to bear arms as long as the federal government deems you competent after passing a test and I guarantee you such an attempt by any state or the federal government to implement such a requirement would be shot down in flames by the courts. Not even the Ninth Circus would be so bold to enforce something like that.
Except it is a Right, and you can't block someones access to a Right with psyche tests just because you feel like doing it....