Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said they got what they asked for. I didn't say they got what they deserved. You did.What sarcasm?Knowing some radical Muslims are suicidal fanatics, and having already been fire-bombed for publishing material which is offensive to radical Muslims, and having no way to defend themselves against an armed attack, these people went right ahead asking for exactly what they got.
Nice sarcasm...
I made a direct statement in the above commentary. Nothing duplicitous or insinuative about it.
If you disagree with it, tell us why.
So they got what they deserved for initiating free speech? You're a dick.
As for the free speech factor. They exercised their right to free speech and they got killed for doing it. I wonder if they would think taunting known fanatical, suicidal killers was worth the sacrifice.
What exactly did they prove?
Agreed, the attacks in Paris were the fault of the Crusades and the CIA. Those hateful Christian bigots caused it all. The vibrant muslim freedom fighters had no choice!The Crusades started because the Muslims would not allow Christians to visit the holy places in Jerusalem. The 1st Crusade was really nothing more than an armed pilgrimage to the Holy Land in defiance of the Muslim restrictions.
Actually, the Crusades were started because Urban II wanted to re-establish his Street Cred against the anti-Pope Henry IV had set up in opposition to him. And the Crusades probably did more damage than good, as it hastened the demise of the Byzantine Empire. My personal favorite being the Fourth Crusade, which never got near a Muslim.
Obviously, you learned your history in a university that teaches about Talking Snakes in Science Class.
The conflict the US has had with the Muslim world has never been religious or ideological. It was mostly connected to the power struggle in the Middle East because of the Cold War and to secure stable oil supplies not only for the US but for the rest of industrialized world.
Yeah, and fuck those people who rightfully owned the oil. If they complained and threw out their corrupt Shah, BP and the CIA would put that asshole right back in!!!
I don't subscribe to that kind of neglect for the complexities of all of those groups of people.I agree, Muslim terrorists have nothing to do with Islam or its peaceful doctrines and very peaceful history, and the Crusades prove violence has everything to do with Christianity. Islam is a religion of peace, Christianity is a religion of hateful right wing teabaggers.
Not anywhere NEAR enough.In the context of Militant Islam... to the Devil with other people's feelings.
The little asswipes will be dealing with much worse hurt feelings, if France decides upon an Edict of Expulsion, to flush-away their Muslim dregs.
Enough, defending and excusing these dikkwads, and rationalizing their actions.
Enough.
Enough lumping all people into one bag, too...
But you think prosecuting gun sellers and making guns more difficult to get WILL stop someone that is keen on committing a crime?
Oh, yeah, absolutely. I think once the gun sellers are held responsible for the CARNAGE they inflict on America, they will knock that shit the fuck off.
Don't know how many they insulted the Jews, compared to Muslims, but they didn't hold back on anyone. Yet only the Muslims are allowed to flip their pancakes over a bunch of insulting cartoons.
If so many people there are crazy, in those communities, maybe they belong in an asylum, not among common-sensed people.
Or maybe we should just stop fucking withe. Let's make sweet, sweet love to that hornet's nest.
Agreed, most Muslims are totally normal and most of them don't have extreme views at all. It is totally normal to support prosecuting anti-islamic cartoon makers like 78% of "British" Muslims support. And only 35% of "British" Muslim youth support suicide attacks. Not extreme at all. Totally normal people perfectly assimilating into Western Society.I don't subscribe to that kind of neglect for the complexities of all of those groups of people.I agree, Muslim terrorists have nothing to do with Islam or its peaceful doctrines and very peaceful history, and the Crusades prove violence has everything to do with Christianity. Islam is a religion of peace, Christianity is a religion of hateful right wing teabaggers.
The majority of righties who jumped on the Tea Party band wagon are no more hateful than any given bunch of Democrats.
A majority of Muslims, equal in percentage to that, around the world, don't carry out terrorist attacks no matter how they feel about the US and Israel.
[/URL]
not like in the Paris vid )
stoopid dolts..............
When somebody is shot at point blank range with an AK 7.62X39 round......in the head......the carnage to the head is massive (
Helllllooooooooooo............here is what an ACTUAL shot to the head at close range looks like >>>
WARNING.....HIGHLY GRAPHIC
The vid we saw yesterday was a movie!!! Sorry!!!
Hate to rain on the sheeple parade but................
stoopid dolts..............
When somebody is shot at point blank range with an AK 7.62X39 round......in the head......the carnage to the head is massive (
Helllllooooooooooo............here is what an ACTUAL shot to the head at close range looks like >>>
WARNING.....HIGHLY GRAPHIC
The vid we saw yesterday was a movie!!! Sorry!!!
Hate to rain on the sheeple parade but................
I'm with you skooks. That was not a head shot on the sidewalk. Smells like another false flag
-Geaux
The Crusades started because the Muslims would not allow Christians to visit the holy places in Jerusalem. The 1st Crusade was really nothing more than an armed pilgrimage to the Holy Land in defiance of the Muslim restrictions.
Actually, the Crusades were started because Urban II wanted to re-establish his Street Cred against the anti-Pope Henry IV had set up in opposition to him. And the Crusades probably did more damage than good, as it hastened the demise of the Byzantine Empire. My personal favorite being the Fourth Crusade, which never got near a Muslim.
Obviously, you learned your history in a university that teaches about Talking Snakes in Science Class.
The conflict the US has had with the Muslim world has never been religious or ideological. It was mostly connected to the power struggle in the Middle East because of the Cold War and to secure stable oil supplies not only for the US but for the rest of industrialized world.
Yeah, and fuck those people who rightfully owned the oil. If they complained and threw out their corrupt Shah, BP and the CIA would put that asshole right back in!!!
Obama sympathizes with their complaints.
Fox News isn't responsible for Obama's words, his policies, and the message he projects.
Those of us that don't have Fox News can just as easily see his failed policies, and weak response to terrorist attacks. This is an administration that blamed a YouTube video for a terrorist attack, and had the video maker arrested and imprisoned for it. His administration also criticized the cartoonist mag before this attack, trying to silence them in making fun of the pedophile false prophet.
Fox News is probably the only channel in the US that doesn't spout the Agenda for the left non-stop. That, is the greatest sin of all to the progressives.
Bilc 10503763Obama sympathizes with their complaints.
You are actually sympathizing with and encouraging the terrorists when you concoct those stories that the President of the US is responsible for terrorist acts because he doesn't make certain idiotic verbal noises that you right wingers need to hear. Or the nonsense that Obama sympathizes with terrorists complaints.
You see the terrorists can see that when they kill innocents they effect the political mood in the US to turn ever more against their President. It is all led by the right wing news and entertainment industry which plies it's ugly trade for earnings. The terrorists kill some French people and two of the right wing entertainment buffoons on radio that I've heard the past couple days came out spitting all over themselves uttering more contempt and loathing for Obama's weakness in combatting terrorists as the reason these killers do this.
It is inexcusable when one thinks about what terrorists and the US right are doing to use their acts of terror for political gain.
I said they got what they asked for. I didn't say they got what they deserved. You did.
As for the free speech factor. They exercised their right to free speech and they got killed for doing it. I wonder if they would think taunting known fanatical, suicidal killers was worth the sacrifice.
What exactly did they prove?
